A TAKE ON DONALD TRUMP ...
"Charles is back, (partially), after many months of battling post
surgery complications and enduring lengthy rehabilitation. Please read
his message about Trump, about whom he
has not been kind at times with his observations. This article is
interesting for all who may want to see what Dr K has analyzed during
his lengthy absence…
This is from Charles Krauthammer who did not go for Trump, read what he thinks of him now!
Charles Krauthammer's interesting take on Mr. Trump:
To my friends "of a different persuasion" I'm not trying to sell
anything or anyone but I do feel this is an interesting take on our very
controversial president who I truly believe is not Republican or
Democrat.
A TAKE ON DONALD TRUMP ...
A different take on Donald Trump: (a non-political agenda)
Trump Is Not A Liberal or Conservative, He's a "Pragmatist."
(Definition: A pragmatist is someone who is practical and focused on
reaching a goal. A pragmatist usually has a straightforward,
matter-of-fact approach and
doesn't let emotion distract him or her.)
We recently enjoyed a belated holiday dinner with friends at the
home of other friends. The dinner conversation varied from discussions
about antique glass and china to theology and politics. At one point,
reference was made to Donald Trump being a conservative, to which I
responded that Trump is not a conservative. I said that I neither view
nor do I believe Trump views himself as a conservative. I stated it was
my opinion that Trump is a pragmatist. He sees a problem and understands
it must be fixed. He doesn't see the problem as liberal or
conservative, he sees it only as a problem. That is a quality
that should be admired and applauded, not condemned. But I get ahead of myself.
Viewing problems from a Liberal perspective has resulted in the
creation of more problems, more entitlement programs, more victims, more
government, more political correctness, and more attacks on the working
class in all economic strata.
Viewing things according to the
so-called Republican conservative perspective has brought continued
spending and globalism to the detriment of American interests and well
being, denial of what the real problems are, Weak, ineffective,
milquetoast, leadership that amounts to Barney Fife
Deputy Sheriff,
appeasement oriented and afraid of its own shadow. In brief, it has
brought liberal ideology with a pachyderm as a mascot juxtaposed to the
ass of the Democrat Party.
Immigration isn't a Republican
problem, it isn't a Liberal problem, it is a problem that threatens the
very fabric and infrastructure of America. It demands a pragmatic
approach not an approach that is intended to appease one group or
another.
The impending collapse of the economy wasn't a Liberal or
Conservative problem, it is an American problem. That said, until it is
viewed as a problem that demands a common sense approach to resolution,
it will never be fixed because the Democrats and Republicans know only
one way to fix things
and the longevity of their impracticality has
proven to have no lasting effect. Successful businessmen like Donald
Trump find ways to make things work, they do not promise to accommodate.
Trump uniquely understands that China's manipulation of currency
is not a Republican problem or a Democrat problem. It is a problem that
threatens our financial stability and he understands the proper balance
needed to fix it. Here again, successful businessmen, like Trump, who
have weathered the changing tides of economic reality understand what is
necessary to make business work, and they, unlike both sides of the
political aisle, know that if something doesn't work, you don't continue
trying to make it work hoping that at some point it will.
As a
pragmatist, Donald Trump hasn't made wild pie-in-the-sky promises of a
cell phone in every pocket, free college tuition, and a $15 hour minimum
wage for working the drive-through at Carl's Hamburgers.
I
argue that America needs pragmatists because pragmatists see a problem
and find ways to fix them. They do not see a problem and compound it by
creating more problems.
You may not like Donald Trump, but I suspect that the reason some people do not like him is because:
(1) he is antithetical to the "good old boy" method of brokering backroom deals that fatten the coffers of politicians;
(2) they are unaccustomed to hearing a president speak who is
unencumbered by the financial shackles of those who he owes vis-a-vis
donations;
(3) he is someone who is free of idiomatic political ideology;
(4) he says what he is thinking, is unapologetic for his outspoken
thoughts, speaks very straightforward using everyday language that can
be understood by all (and is offensive to some who dislike him anyway)
making him a great communicator, for the most part, does what he says he
will do and;
(5) he is someone who understands that it takes more
than hollow promises and political correctness to make America great
again.
Listening to Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders talk
about fixing America is like listening to two lunatics trying to "out
crazy" one another. Jeb Bush, John Kasich and Marco Rubio are owned
lock, stock, and barrel by the bankers, corporations, and big dollar
donors funding their campaigns. Bush can deny it, but common sense tells
anyone willing to face facts is that
people don't give tens of millions without expecting something in return.
We have had Democrats and Republican ideologues and what has it
brought us? Are we better off today or worse off? Has it happened
overnight or has it been a steady decline brought on by both parties?
I submit that a pragmatist is just what America needs right now. People
are quick to confuse and despise confidence as arrogance, but that is
common among those who have never accomplished anything in their lives
(or politicians who never really solved a problem, because it's better
to still have an "issue(s) to be solved," so re-elect me to solve it,
(which never
happens) and those who have always played it safe
(again, all politicians) not willing to risk failure, to try and achieve
success).
Donald Trump put his total financial empire at
risk in running for president and certainly did not need or possibly
even want the job; that says it all. He wants success for the U.S. and
her citizens because he loves his country."
No comments:
Post a Comment