To the Honorable Members of the Colorado Senate,
To the Honorable Members of the Colorado Senate,
Thank you for taking this letter and my hope
is that YOU are able to read it, not an aide or staff member. I am
writing this letter to you.
Before I get into the nuts and bolts of my
concerns, please let me tell you a little about myself, with the hope
that you will understand where I am coming from. My name is Jeff Rezak. I
am a patr...ol officer for a police department
in Colorado. I have worked in law enforcement continuously for the last
18 years, and I also had the honor of serving for four years with the
United States Marine Corps. During my time in law enforcement I have,
for the most part been patrol, responding to
calls for service. I also served for almost 10 years on a SWAT team,
and had the collateral duties of Sniper and Tactical Medic. I served 3
years as a School Resource Officer and had four schools assigned to me,
containing about 1700 students at any given
time. During this time I also served for nearly 10 years as a volunteer
firefighter and EMS Emergency Medical Technician.
What I am NOT is a political figure, a college
professor, a talking head on the television, or a statistician. I don’t
do statistics and I have never been to college. I am your normal,
everyday working stiff who works very hard for
my family, my community, and my country. I have a very deep love for my
family, my community and my God. I am the everyday guy that you
represent and serve.
A couple of days ago I was sent an e-mail that
contained the paper from the White House titled, “Now is the Time: The
President’s plan to protect our children and our communities by reducing
gun violence”.
As I said before, I am a street cop. I am one
of the many dedicated men and women that will be responding to the next
tragedy when it happens. If you notice I did not say “if” it happens,
because it will happen again. So please keep
that in mind as you read further.
I read the paper from beginning to end. I then
read it again, and have several times since. I tried very hard to make
sense of it and try to really see where the leaders of this country were
headed. Then my own state started doing
the same thing. So with a very open mind I began to look at facts. Not
the political rhetoric that has been playing out, but the bare bone
facts of this issue. Keep in mind that I do have not only some
experience in dealing with these issues, but have a vested
interest in the future as well. As I said before, I am one of the
people that has to respond first hand.
In keeping with the facts, I only looked at
official U.S. Government findings. I used the F.B.I. Uniformed Crime
Report 2011, as my main focus, due to 2012 not yet being complete. I
also obtained figures from the Center for Disease
Control and obviously the White House paper.
I will say now, I am against gun control in
the manner it is being portrayed in the press and from my government.
With that said, I was very surprised with some of the information I
found. Here is some of what I was able to find:
In 2007 there were 14,916 total murders
reported in the United States. In 2011 there were a total of 12,664.
This is a DECREASE of 15.1% over five years.
In 2007 it was reported of the murders listed
above, 453 were committed with rifles. Please keep in mind that is with
ANY rifle, not just “assault rifles”. A muzzle loader used in the
Revolutionary War would count for this category.
This accounts for 3.13% of all total murders in 2007. During this time
19 law enforcement officers used a rifle to kill a felon in the
commission of a felony crime DEFENDING themselves or someone else (FBI
U.C.R.2011 Expanded Homicide Data Table 14), as well
as 8 private citizens (Expanded Homicide Data Table 15).
In 2011 there were a total of 323 murders with
rifles or 2.55% of the total homicides. Again, it does not distinguish
between types of rifles. This is a DECREASE of 28.7% in the last five
years of homicides using rifles. The decrease
in the use of rifles versus the decrease of any other means is almost
twice the percentage. In 2011, law enforcement used rifles 33 times,
(FBI U.C.R.2011 Expanded Homicide Data Table 14), and 12 times by a
private citizen, (Expanded Homicide Data Table 15).
This is 45 times the rifle was used in the killing of a felon during
the commission of a felony crime, and lives were saved.
Now by way of comparison I also looked at the
number of murders by other various means in 2011, (FBI U.C.R. 2011
Expanded Homicide Data Table 11). There were 1,694 people killed with
knives or cutting instruments, (1,371 more than
rifles). There were also 496 killed with Blunt objects (173 more than
rifles), and 726 with “Personal weapons”, defined as “hands, fists,
feet, etc. 403 more people were plain and simple beat to death, than
killed by a rifle of ANY KIND. Given these numbers,
the odds are higher that a victim will be stabbed to death, beaten to
death, or killed with a baseball bat, than shot with a rifle.
I then looked at the same numbers within the
State of Colorado for 2011. In Colorado there were a total of 147
reported homicides. Of those, 3 were with a rifle of any type, or 2.04%.
During the same time 22 people were killed by cutting
or stabbing, or 15%, and 21 were killed by hands, fists, feet, etc., or
14.5%. In Colorado the use of a rifle was less than the national
average. (F.B.I. Uniform Crime Report 2011, Table 20).
On a side note I found it interesting that on
July 17, 2012, the United States Government Accountability Office
published a paper at the request of Senator Feinstein and Representative
Sensenbrenner, which in essence stated concealed
carry permits were increasing on a national level. In the paragraph
titled “What GAO Found” states, “The number of states allowing concealed
carry permits is increasing…” This paragraph also states in 2002 there
were 7 states and the District of Columbia that
prohibited concealed carry. As of March of 2012 only one state,
Illinois, and the District of Columbia are the only places still not
allowed. It was interesting to me that these are two of the most
dangerous places in the United States, and the FBI U.C.R.
confirmed that. In Chicago alone, with some of the most stringent gun
control laws in the nation, there have been 228 homicides this year to
date. There have been 144 U.S. troops killed in the war zone of
Afghanistan over the same period. Now as I said before,
I am not a “scholar”, but I do have some common sense and can see the
relativity between the decrease in homicides above and the allowing
people to have the right to take responsibility for their own safety.
Again, these numbers did not come from Fox
News, CNN, MSNBC, the NRA, or any other organization that could be
considered on “one side or the other”. It came from official federal
government data.
I looked at the last several mass murders, and
looked at what is proposed. I could find nothing in proposed gun
control, and taking free and responsible citizens rights, that would
have prevented these shootings. Each one of these
shooters violated MULTIPLE laws ALREADY in existence, both state and
federal.
During this same time the Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention estimates alcohol alone is responsible for more
than 79,000 deaths annually and costs the United States about $185
billion in health care and criminal justice expenses.
Every day 32 people die in the United States from a motor vehicle crash
that involves alcohol. (CDC – Excessive Alcohol Use – At A Glance,
April 12, 2011). That is 12,000 people a year, very close to the TOTAL
homicide rate. Where is the outrage for this?
So my question is this. Why is the rifle, any
rifle, being demonized because of a select few individuals? Common sense
will tell us all, when looked at it with reality and no special
agendas, that these people would have found any
way possible to commit these horrendous acts.
As a law enforcement officer I have responded
to multiple horrendous incidents. One of the things I go to very often
is fatality motor vehicle crashes. Many of these are alcohol involved
deaths. The last two mass fatality accidents
I have personally responded to involved blue Ford vehicles driven by
drunk drivers. Now I ask you, by the people that will vote for these gun
laws ways of thinking, we should outlaw all blue Ford vehicles, because
obviously the blue Ford vehicles are used
by drunk drivers to kill people? I know that is ridiculous, but that is
exactly what passing any of the gun control laws being proposed now is
saying. It is not the blue Ford vehicles fault any more than it is the
rifles fault. How many rounds in a magazine
will not stop them and making honest people do background checks will
not stop them. They have ALWAYS found a way around laws when they are
determined, and this will not change.
There are enough gun control laws on the books
now, over 22,000 between federal, state and local jurisdictions. I fail
to see how passing one more law that only honest people will honor,
like every other one, will make a difference.
None of the laws being proposed would have stopped a single shooting as
of late. So I ask, why are you thinking they will now?? That just does
not make sense.
In 1982 there were 26,173 alcohol related
fatality crashes in the United States. By 2010 that number was down to
10,228. This is a 60.92% decrease. Did we require a background check
before someone could buy alcohol? No we did not.
We also did not limit the amount of alcohol someone could buy and we
did not ban alcohol or vehicles. In fact there was not a major change to
the DUI laws during the entire time. We did change the limit for a DUI
from 0.100% to a 0.08% at the demands of the
federal government. But in reality that was not a huge change since we
could still arrest for a DWAI at a 0.05%. It only changed the penalties.
We did it with education, communication and enforcing the laws. We
educated with television ads, school programs
and general public awareness. We also educated our courts and law
enforcement that DUI's were not acceptable. We communicated with the
courts. We also created the REDDI, (Report Every Drunk Driver
Immediately), and encouraged people to be involved and report.
We then enforced the current laws ALREADY on the books. We arrested
when before we would have just taken them home. We charged them and the
courts enforced those arrests.
Let's try something new. How about we enforce
and actually prosecute the laws we already have on the books. Open
communication between mental health providers and law enforcement. Let's
try to FIX the problem instead of passing some
more feel good legislation that will do nothing. That way when the next
shooting happens, and it will, you don't have to sit in your office and
wonder how it could happen. It will be a shame for those that vote for
this to have to live with the reality they
cost honest people lives, hindered jobs, and took rights away from law
abiding citizens and still the shootings happened. But by voting for
these measures that is the reality. Let's bring some common sense back
to the problem.
Thank you for your time,
Jeff Rezak
No comments:
Post a Comment