WAS IT RACKETEERING/RICO? Many of the Same Fraudulent Election Activities in 2020 Election Took Place Across Six Counties in Six States

By Joe Hoft
Published June 30, 2021 at 12:15pm

We know that the 2020 Election came down to six counties in six swing states.  What’s really interesting is that there were many of the same activities in these counties that were present in many of them if not all of them.  

Dr. Peter Navarro, President Trump’s Director of the Office and Trade and Manufacturing Policy, provided some excellent charts in the latter days of President Trump’s first term related to the 2020 Election.  In the six swing states in 2020, there were many of the same activities that occurred across multiple states.

He listed absentee ballot abuses in these states.

TRENDING: EXCLUSIVE: USB DRIVES Were Suspiciously Stolen, Transferred and Inserted Into Voting Systems Used in Swing States in 2020 Election

In addition, Navarro listed numerous other fraudulent activities that took place across multiple states.

Dr. Navarro then listed the various estimated and the actual number of ballots associated with the fraud activities embedded in the election and compared the estimated and known fraud to the margins given to Biden in the election:

Navarro’s list is excellent.  Since these lists were created we identified some additional activities that appear across these swing states during the 2020 Election.

Lost, Stolen, and Suspiciously Transferred USBs

USBs were lost or stolen and suspiciously transferred between individuals during the election.  In Arizona, Georgia, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin before or during the election, USBs were reported stolen or suspiciously transferred during the election.

Colorado Drivers With No DUIs Getting a Pay Day On Wednesday

Comparisons.org

SQL Software

Suspicious SQL Software was found on machines in Michigan and Pennsylvania and is likely on machines in Arizona and Georgia.

Missing Chain of Custody Documentation 

We know that legally required chain of custody information is missing in Georgia.  We also know that chain of custody documentation was requested in the audit in Maricopa County Arizona and it has not been provided.  It is likely that it is not available in all these states and numerous others across the country.

Coordinated Ballot Drops 

The timing of ballots recorded after Election Day was synchronized between Pennsylvania and Georgia after the election.

Does this indicate a RACKETEERING/RICO case involving numerous individuals coordinating together to steal our elections?

 

First draft of Colorado’s new state Senate, House district maps could pit 20 incumbents against each other

Redistricting staff released preliminary maps for how state legislative districts should be drawn

• 
  

Sandra Fish, Thy Vo, and Daniel Ducassi

8:26 AM MDT on Jun 29, 2021

The Colorado House chambers on the first day of Colorado's special legislative session on Monday, Nov. 30, 2020. (Andy Colwell, Special to The Colorado Sun)

• Credibility:
• 
  

Colorado House and Senate district maps drawn as the state begins its once-a-decade redistricting process placed a number of incumbent lawmakers into the same districts, setting the stage for election battles next year. 

The maps, rough drafts prepared by nonpartisan redistricting staff and presented Tuesday morning to the Colorado Independent Legislative Redistricting Commission, are expected to change a lot over the next few months. But they’re an important starting point for public debate, as the commission embarks on a statewide roadshow in July to get input from the public and community groups on how political lines should be redrawn. 

TODAY’S UNDERWRITER

This year is the first time that the redistricting process for congressional and legislative is being overseen by two independent commissions. Unlike previous years, nonpartisan legislative staff will not consider the home addresses of incumbent politicians as they create the maps.

How that plays out will have significant political ramifications for Coloradans as control of the General Assembly is at stake. When Democrats won both houses in the General Assembly in 2018, they were able to achieve policy goals stymied by Senate Republicans in the previous four years. Republicans see redistricting this year as an opportunity to retake control of the Senate, where Democrats currently outnumber them by five seats.

The new districts will take effect for the 2022 election, said Jeremiah Barry, a legislative attorney advising the commission.

Members of the House serve two-year terms, and will be required to run again in 2022 anyway. But it’s unclear how the changes would apply to senators, who are elected to four-year terms, Barry said.

Senators drawn into new districts would be entitled to complete their terms. It’s not clear what would happen if two senators, who are elected to four-year terms, end up in the same district next year and still have time left to serve.

“That’s an issue we’re looking at,” said Barry, adding that if that scenario does occur with the final maps, it may be up to the Colorado Supreme Court to resolve.

The state constitution requires that state senators and representatives live in their district for at least one year before they are elected to office.

Click to view files of the proposed legislative maps.

Staff cautioned that the maps are likely to change significantly over the next few months.

The preliminary maps are based on 2019 U.S. Census Bureau estimates because of a delay in the release of the final population data collected during the 2020 Census. Once the U.S. Census Bureau releases that data in August, redistricting staff will have to adjust the map. 

“These will never be approved by anyone…they are merely a baseline starting point for conversations across the state,” said Jessika Shipley, staff director to the independent redistricting commissions.

Seven Senate districts include two incumbents

The Sun identified at least seven of the proposed Senate districts that each contain two incumbents. Three include two Democrats, three include a Democrat and Republican, and one includes two Republicans.

Those districts include:

• Democratic Sens. Faith Winter, of Westminster, and Rachel Zenzinger, of Arvada, in Senate District 28. Winter is up for reelection next year, while Zenzinger’s term ends in 2024.
• Democratic Sens. Chris Kolker, of Centennial, and Jeff Bridges, of Greenwood Village, in Senate District 18. Both are up for reelection in 2024.
• Democratic Sens. Chris Hansen and Robert Rodriguez, both of Denver, in District 22. Rodriguez is up for reelection next year.
• Democratic Sen. Sonya Jaquez Lewis, of Longmont, and Republican Sen. Barbara Kirkmeyer, of Brighton, in District 32. Both are in their first term and up for reelection in 2024. 
• Republican Sen. Kevin Priola, of Henderson, and Democratic Sen. Dominick Moreno, of Commerce City, in District 30. Both are term limited in 2024.
• Republican Sen. Larry Liston and Democratic Sen. Pete Lee, both of Colorado Springs, in District 13. Lee is up for reelection in 2022, Liston in 2024.
• Republican Sens. Chris Holbert and Jim Smallwood, both of Parker, in District 16. Holbert is term-limited next year, Smallwood in 2024.

Democrats held the Senate from 2004 through 2012, but Republicans won control in 2014 and 2016, albeit with a single-vote margin. 

In 2018, Democrats regained control with a three-vote margin, which increased to five votes in 2020. Six of the 17 seats up for grabs in 2022 will be open because incumbents are term-limited.

MORE: Here are the Colorado legislative districts that stand to change the most during redistricting

Incumbents paired in 13 House districts

Two incumbents are placed together in at least 13 of the proposed House districts. Seven include two Democrats, five include two Republicans and one includes both a Democrat and Republican.

Those districts include:

• Republican Reps. Matt Soper, of Delta, and Marc Catlin, of Montrose, are in House District 53 on the Western Slope.
• Democratic Reps. Julie McCluskie, of Dillon, and Dylan Roberts, of Avon, are in House District 35.
• Republican Reps. Richard Holtorf, of Akron, and Rod Pelton, of Cheyenne Wells, are in House District 40.
• First-term Republican Reps. Ron Hanks, of Cañon City, and Stephanie Luck, of Penrose, are in House District 34.
• Republican Reps. Terri Carver and Andres Pico, both of Colorado Springs, are in House District 48. Carver can’t run again in 2022 because of term limits.
• Democratic Reps. Edie Hooton and Judy Amabile, both of Boulder, are in House District 37.
• Republican Reps. Kim Ransom and Mark Baisley, both of Littleton, are in House District 33. Ransom is term-limited in 2022.
• Democratic Reps. Kerry Tipper, of Lakewood, and Lisa Cutter, of Littleton, are in House District 10.
• Democratic Rep. Alex Valdez and House Speaker Alec Garnett, both of Denver, are in House District 2. Garnett is term-limited next year.
• Democratic Reps. David Ortiz, of Littleton, and Meg Froelich, of Englewood, are in House District 9.
• Democratic Reps. Kyle Mullica, of Northglenn, and Yadira Carveo, of Thornton, are in House District 28.
• Democratic Reps. Shannon Bird, of Westminster, and Matt Gray, of Broomfield, are in House District 27.
• Democratic Rep. Tracey Bernett, of Longmont, and Republican Rep. Dan Woog, of Erie, are in House District 38. Both are serving their first term.

Democrats took control of the state House in 2004 for the first time since 1976. They lost by a narrow margin in 2010, but took back the House in 2012 after redistricting and have had a 41-24 advantage since the 2018 election.

Eight of the 65 House seats will be open in 2022, including three being vacated by Douglas County Republicans.

Open Districts

Seven Senate districts and 14 House districts have no incumbents under the proposed maps.

Senate:

• District 31 in Lafayette, Louisville, Superior and Broomfield. 
• District 29 centered in Thornton.
• District 21 in southwest Denver.
• District 19 centered in Littleton and Lakewood.
• District 17 in Aurora and Centennial.
• District 15 in Castle Rock and Parker.
• District 14 in northwest Colorado Springs.

House:

• District 57 in northwestern Colorado.
• District 65 in northwestern Colorado.
• District 41 in southern Colorado circling Pueblo.
• District 63 in Larimer and Weld counties.
• District 39 in Weld County, including part of Greeley.
• District 36 in western Boulder and Boulder County.
• District 26 in Westminster and Adams County.
• District 4 in downtown and north central Denver.
• District 20 in Centennial and other parts of Arapahoe County.
• District 21 in Centennial and other parts of Arapahoe County.
• District 31 in Parker and other parts of Douglas County.
• District 47 in north central Colorado Springs.
• District 49 in northwest Colorado Springs.

How much will the maps change? 

Probably quite a bit. 

Staff said the initial maps should be taken with a big grain of salt. In addition to changes that will likely occur once redistricting staff get final population data from the U.S. Census, commissioners have a number of other factors to weigh.

They also must weigh the different and often conflicting demands of the public, consider different “communities of interest” and factors such as political competitiveness. 

TODAY’S UNDERWRITER

For example, the maps presented by staff Tuesday made an effort to keep cities and counties whole as often as possible, a decision that Barry said was due to confusing public input about the geography of certain communities of interest. 

That appears to have impacted Hispanic communities in the proposed House map, Barry noted. The map includes three proposed districts with majority Hispanic populations, down from the seven such districts in the current map. At least nine other districts in the proposed map have Hispanic populations of more than 30%, according to the demographic data released by nonpartisan staff. 

Commissioners may want to consider whether minority communities or other communities of interest are more important than city and county boundaries in certain districts, Barry said.

It’s also not clear how different the final population data will be from the 2019 estimates that staff are currently using to start the redistricting process.

Scott Martinez, an elections attorney who works with Democratic groups, believes the final data will reflect harder-to-reach communities. 

“A lot of outreach occurred in the final months [of the census] to count those folks in densely-populated, minority areas,” said Martinez. 

After criticism about how staff considered political competitiveness in the preliminary congressional map released last week, Barry said staff also considered the results of the 2020 state Senate race. That’s in addition to looking at party registration and the outcome of the 2018 state attorney general contest. 

“We’re not certain that these are the best projections for whether a district meets the definition for competitiveness,” said Barry. “This is indeed one of the more difficult decisions the commission will have to make.”

MORE: Here’s where a preliminary map places Colorado’s new 8th Congressional District

Public hearings around the state in July, August

The legislative commission and the Colorado Independent Congressional Redistricting Commission will hold 32 hearings around the state beginning July 9. Members of the public can also participate by submitting comments online.

Official census data is scheduled for release Aug. 16, and nonpartisan staff will redraw the congressional and legislative maps based on feedback from Coloradans and the two commissions. The two commissions may give direction to the staff if 8 of 12 members vote for a proposal.

Ultimately, the Colorado Supreme Court must approve the maps by the end of the year, allowing election officials to prepare for the 2022 elections.

Polis commuting mandate on employers moving ahead; written comments open into August

June 21, 2021 By Sherrie Peif

DENVER — The state agency tasked by Gov. Jared Polis to create a mandate requiring large employers to promote commuting alternatives to driving in a car to their employees is taking written comments on the regulatory scheme, and is scheduled to begin the public hearing comment portion of the rule making process in August.

The new regulations– which bypass the legislative process —are being created by the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (CDPHE), a state agency under the direction of Polis, and implemented under the authority of the Colorado Air Quality Control Commission (AQCC), which is made up of Polis appointees.

CDPHE is currently taking written public comments concerning those rules until 11:59 p.m. on Aug. 3, and a virtual public comment hearing is scheduled for 4:30-7:30 p.m. on Aug. 18. More details on the hearing can be found on CDPHE’s website.

Earlier this year, Polis told CDPHE to propose new regulations surrounding how employees get to and from their places of employment. Those rules will require companies in the Denver and Front Range areas with more than 100 employees create an Employee Transportation Reduction Plan (ETRP) aimed at reducing air pollution by offering commuting alternatives for those employees who currently drive themselves to work.  Businesses will be forced to hire a transportation manager to implement their plan.

It comes after a 2019 law that requires a 26% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions by 2025 and a 90% reduction from 2005 levels by 2050.

Kelly Sloan, executive director of the Freedom to Drive Coalition said there have been a few changes that have “watered down” the rule, but it is still a bad rule that his organization will continue to fight for multiple reasons, he said.

“The whole thing is bureaucratic absurdity at its worst,” Sloan said. “The issue is this is rule making has not gone through the legislature. It has not seen the inside of the committee room or debated on the floor, but it will impact 900,000 people.”

Polis’ goal is for large companies to reduce the number of individual drivers to 75 percent or less by 2022 and 60 percent or less by 2024.

“So, in three years they will essentially tell 400,000 people they can’t drive themselves to work. This is the demon child of (House Bill 19-1261). This is what happens when the legislature grants all its authority to these executive departments, none of these commissioners are accountable to the voters,” said Sloan.

The Colorado Regional Air Quality Council (CRAQC) has estimated an annual RTD transit subsidy would cost the area’s 800 employers who have greater than 250 employees each nearly $200 million a year (about $250,000 per year, per employer).

However, the new rules would apply to all businesses over 100 employees, which CDPHE estimates there are 2,763, totaling more than 875,000 employees, questioning whether the alternative transportation infrastructure needed to move that number of new riders, twice a day on the right time schedules is possible.

The new rules still apply to any business with more than 100 employees, but only those in nine counties the CDPHE has determined is not in attainment with its pollution standards. Those counties are approximately everything from Colorado Springs on the south to Wellington on the north and Estes Park on the West to Washington County on the east, including all metro Denver counties, Douglas County, Larimer County, Boulder County and Weld County.

“As it stands, they’ve also taken out the civil penalties to businesses if employees don’t follow the plan, but I’d bet there is going to be some push back to that from the environmental organizations,” Sloan said.

Sloan also notes that some of the suggested alternatives to commuting by car, such as telecommuting and using mass transit, simply don’t work for large numbers of workers and are neither simple nor practical as supporters believe.

“If you are in a sector like hospitals or airports, you can’t work from home,” Sloan said. “You can’t build airplane parts from your living room. An emergency room nurse can’t work from home. And most businesses don’t happen to be located on a rail line. Colorado is not Manhattan.”

Additionally, Sloan said there is simply a basic liberty argument against this.

“What about the single mom who has to drop one kid off at daycare and another at school and then pick them up and on the way home has to pick up groceries,” Sloan said. “What if you get a call your kid got sick at school, and now you don’t have your vehicle. What are you supposed to do, hop on five different busses and get out your magic carpet?”

Sloan said there needs to be a rigorous cost benefit analysis done on this proposal because he sees those businesses on the bubble of the employment levels going a different direction in how they would handle the new rules.

“If you are a business of 104 people and you’re looking at this from the practical side, are you tempted to look around and see if you can find efficiency to get rid of five employees?

The Colorado legislature’s attack on democracy

GUEST COLUMN: The Colorado legislature’s attack on democracy

• Ben Murrey
• Jun 25, 2021 Updated 7 hrs ago

The Colorado General Assembly spent the 2021 legislative session searching for every possible opportunity to undermine TABOR and increase taxes without voter consent. Their attempts—while largely successful—reveal the progressive left’s disdain for democracy.

The headline of a Denver Post editorial board column published Sunday, June 13 proudly exclaimed, “TABOR died and that’s (mostly) a good thing.”

Anyone who read the editorial will find that they utterly failed to make a case against the Taxpayer’s Bill of Rights. They didn’t even try. Instead, they underscored the pride progressives in this state take in waging war on democracy and the American experiment. That should concern us all.

The Declaration of Independence proclaims that governments “deriv[e] their just powers from the consent of the governed.” Americans spell out and limit those powers in constitutions.

In the most democratic expression of the people’s will possible in our system of government, Coloradans amended their constitution in 1992 by adopting TABOR. To avoid ambiguity, the people said right at the beginning that their purpose was to “reasonably restrain most the growth of government.”

And what is the left’s primary criticism of TABOR? That it restrains government.

This session, the Legislature was wildly successful in freeing themselves of those restraints imposed by the people via our state constitution.

They managed to increase taxes and fees by over $600 million annually without voter consent. While dubiously declaring broad public support, they bent over backwards to avoid voter approval of $5.4 billion in new fees on things like gas and food delivery. They exploited another end-run around TABOR to increase income taxes by $372 million-per-year. And the list goes on.

These are exactly the kinds of measures voters wanted a say on when they passed TABOR.

When the Left attacks TABOR, however, they never defend all the new taxes and fees imposed by side-stepping TABOR. Instead, they feign that the constitutional amendment prevents the state from funding important government functions such as roads and education.

But TABOR doesn’t dictate spending priorities. It restrains taxation and revenue. With it, voters are telling their elected officials, “We elected you to spend the money we give you the way you see fit, but if you want more of our money, you’ll need to ask us first.”

In 2005, the Legislature made the case to voters that the state wasn’t brining in enough money to fund essential government services. In response, voters approved Referendum C.

The measure lifted the TABOR revenue limits for 5 years and then increased them permanently. As a result, the state has brought in $25 billion above the original TABOR caps.

If after Ref C the Legislature still isn’t properly funding essential services, that’s an indictment on them, not on voters or on TABOR. It’s no wonder the state has been unsuccessful in winning approval for tax increases in recent years.

And that’s what the left truly detests about TABOR—the democratic element. They think voters are stupid. They believe they know better how to spend Coloradans’ hard-earned money.

Our nation’s Founders took a very different tone. In 1792, James Madison published a column of his own in the National Gazette, titled, “Who are the best keepers of the people’s liberties?” In it, the “Anti-Republican” represents the person who opposes self-government. Their words could just as well have been spoken by a Colorado Democrat legislator today:

“The people are stupid … They cannot safely trust themselves. When they have established government they should think of nothing but obedience, leaving the care of their liberties to their wiser rulers.”

Madison subsequently condemns anyone holding this view as “a blasphemer of [the people’s] rights and an idolater of tyranny.”

His answer instead is that “the people themselves” are the best keeper of their liberties. “The sacred trust can be no where [sic] so safe as in the hands most interested in preserving it.”

TABOR puts Coloradans’ liberty over their pocketbooks in the hands most interested in preserving it—the people themselves. For that, we should all be grateful.

 

Who Were the FBI Infiltrators on Jan. 6? – Who Were the Violent Green Tape, Orange Tape and Black Bloc Operatives? Patriot Groups Say They Are Not Familiar With Them

By Jim Hoft
Published June 22, 2021 at 8:03pm

Throughout 2020 the Black Lives Matter terrorist group was linked to at least 91% of the riots that resulted in the most expensive property damage in US insurance history

There were zero Trump rallies that turned violent during that same time period.

Then on January 6, after one million Trump supporters rallied with President Trump at the Ellipse outside the White House, some 900 individuals went inside the US Capitol. Over 400 have since been arrested.  Many of the patriots arrested were waved into the US Capitol by the police standing at the exits.

Since January the Deep State and Democrats will not release videotapes to Republican lawmakers or the American public from January 6th inside or outside the US Capitol.

Last Tuesday Revolver News published an important piece on the “unindicted co-conspirators” in the Jan. 6 attack who were never charged by the DOJ or FBI for their part in the violence on Jan. 6.

The “unindicted co-conspirators” were frequently the most violent and leaders of the assault on the US Capitol. They are also likely FBI informants.

We posted on that earlier today.

The Gateway Pundit later posted proof that the FBI was actively recruiting military members to infiltrate and spy on the Oath Keepers and Proud Boys before the Jan. 6 protests.

On March 23rd, The Gateway Pundit posted this article on former Green Beret Jeremy Brown.

 ** You can support Jeremy Brown’s fundraising effort here.  

Jeremy Brown is a Green Beret and former Republican candidate for Congress in Florida’s 14th Congressional District. Brown served in the United States Army from 1992 to 2012 and reached the rank of Special Forces Master Sergeant.

And Jeremy Brown was approached by the FBI to become an infiltrator of the Proud Boys or Oath Keepers before the Jan. 6 protests.
Jeremy recorded the conversation with the FBI.

Jeremy is not the only one who has questions about the FBI and government infiltrators and co-conspirators on Jan. 6.

The FBI co-conspirators and infiltrators are not just the ones listed in the arrest documents.
Many of the most violent operatives on Jan. 6 leading the battles against police and breaking into the US Capitol have not been arrested.

Our trusted sources pointed out at least three different organized groups from that day who are not showing up in the FBI-DOJ arrest documents.

The Black Bloc operatives were the first ones breaking their way inside the US Capitol on Jan. 6.
One of these operatives conveniently was carrying a Confederate flag – something that played right into the media narrative of Trump supporters.

The green tape operatives were VERY VIOLENT attacking police on Jan. 6 outside the US Capitol.

Another group of orange tape operatives were also organized and violent on Jan. 6.

The orange bloc operatives were leading the charge against the police on Jan. 6.

How many of these violent protesters have made it on the FBI list? How many of these violent protesters made it into the FBI posters?

We spoke today with two leaders of a prominent patriot group. We were told the Oath Keepers and the Proud Boys are not familiar with many of these violent operatives.
So who are they?
And where is the FBI?

Winston Churchill loved paraprosdokians

Winston Churchill loved paraprosdokians, figures of speech in which the latter part of a sentence or phrase is surprising or unexpected.

 

1. Where there's a will, I want to be in it.

2. The last thing I want to do is hurt you, but it's still on my list.

3. Since light travels faster than sound, some people appear bright until you hear them speak.

4. If I agreed with you, we'd both be wrong.

5. War does not determine who is right - only who is left.

6. Knowledge is knowing a tomato is a fruit. Wisdom is not putting

it in a fruit salad.

7. They begin the evening news with 'Good Evening,' then proceed to tell you why it isn't.

8. To steal ideas from one person is plagiarism. To steal from many is research.

9. I thought I wanted a career. Turns out, I just wanted pay checks.

10. In filling out an application, where it says, 'In case of emergency, notify:' I put "DOCTOR."

11. I didn't say it was your fault, I said I was blaming you.

12. Women will never be equal to men until they can walk down the street...with a bald head and a beer gut, and still think they are sexy.

13. Behind every successful man is his woman. Behind the fall of a successful man is usually another woman.

14. A clear conscience is the sign of a fuzzy memory.

15. You do not need a parachute to skydive. You only need a parachute to skydive twice.

16. Money can't buy happiness, but it sure makes misery easier to live with.

17. There's a fine line between cuddling and...holding someone down so they can't get away.

18. I used to be indecisive. Now I'm not so sure.

19. You're never too old to learn something stupid.

20. To be sure of hitting the target, shoot first and call whatever you hit the target.

21. Nostalgia isn't what it used to be.

22. Change is inevitable, except from a vending machine.

23. Going to church doesn't make you a Christian any more than standing in a garage makes you a car.

24. I'm supposed to respect my elders, but now it’s getting harder and harder for me to find one.

 

Trump’s Top Ten ‘We Were Right’ List: Big Tech Is AWFUL at Identifying ‘Fake News’

written by Seton Motley June 17, 2021

Follow Me

Seton Motley

President at Less Government

Seton Motley is the president of Less Government, a DC-based non-profit organization dedicated to reducing the power of government and protecting the First Amendment from governmental assault.

One of America's leading authorities on technology and telecom policy, Motley is a writer, television and radio commentator, political and policy strategist, lecturer, debater, activist, and policy advisor to The Heartland Institute.

“Reporting the news” means relaying what is happening in the world.  Humans do this.  Humans are biased.  So “reporting the news” has always been a biased business.

For whatever reason, nigh since its inception, “reporting the news” has been biased in an almost wholly Leftward direction.

Before electronic media – before electricity – newspapers were the news.  And newspapers were initially honest about their biases.  Because we used to be honest about humans and human nature.

For a long time newspapers were almost always organs of one political Party or another.  And openly said so.  The Arkansas Democrat-Gazette is a holdover from those halcyon days.

Then Leftists decided to expand Leftism – by obfuscating their spreading of it.  Born was the lie that is “unbiased reporting.”  Again: Humans report news.  Humans are biased.  So “reporting the news” remained a biased business.

So you had things like the Leftist New York Times’ lies about Russian Communist Joseph Stalin’s murder of millions of Ukrainians.  This massive dishonesty in service of Leftist mass murder didn’t earn the Times the news business’ condemnation – it won its acclaim.  Their Pulitzer Prizes still stand.

We’ll bypass radio – with its mostly two minute news segments – and go straight to television.  Early TV had but three networks.  Which allowed Leftist fake news anchors like Walter Cronkite – “The Most Trusted Man in America” – to lie with impunity.  Cronkite not only won numerous journalism awards for his Leftist lying – he had journalism awards and a school named after him.

With the addition of cable television, the network news cabal was broken – but not immediately challenged.  Cable simply gave us more Leftist news options from which to choose.

Until Fox News came along.  As the late Charles Krauthammer noted: “(T)he genius of (FNC creators) Rupert Murdoch and Roger Ailes was to have discovered a niche market in American broadcasting — half the American people.”

Krauthammer also observed: “Fox News is no monopoly.  It is a singular minority in a sea of liberal media….The lineup is so unbalanced as to be comical.  And that doesn’t even include the other commanding heights of the culture that are firmly, flagrantly liberal: Hollywood, the foundations, the universities, the elite newspapers.”

And now we have the monstrous Leftism of monstrous Big Tech.

The advent of the Internet looked endlessly promising.  It almost fully democratized the First Amendment.  You no longer had to own a newspaper or television network to have your say.  Regular citizens could effect massive changes – and did.

Often at the expense of legacy Leftists.  In 2004, massive TV network CBS’ massive news anchor Dan Rather used fake documents to try to un-elect Republican President George W. Bush.  And Rather’s lies were first identified and exposed – by the TINY, UTTERLY UN-FAMOUS website LittleGreenFootballs.com.

The Leftist Bigs could not allow that to continue.  So they haven’t.

Big Tech wasn’t yet big in 2004.  So they could do nothing to stop Little Green Footballs from undoing a Leftist lie.  Now that Big Tech can do something about it?  They are.

Big Tech – with all the other Leftist Bigs in tow – have now taken one titanic and totalitarian step beyond what used to be “reporting the news.”  They are now in the “identifying ‘fake news’” business.

Big Tech has deemed themselves the Arbiters of Truth.  This small cabal of Leftist multi-billionaires now get to decide what is or is not “news.”

If Big Tech were big enough in 2004?  They would have blocked everyone who was sharing Little Green Footballs’ truth – and Rather and CBS would have probably gotten away with their lie.  And Bush may very well have lost the election.  Based upon a giant lie – and Big Tech’s defense and promotion of it.

Of course, Big Tech was big enough to do things in 2020 – and throughout Donald Trump’s presidency.  And they dedicated themselves to asserting nigh everything Donald Trump said was a lie.  And blocking and de-platforming anyone who shared Trump’s words and thoughts.

And not just Trump himself. Big Tech declared a great many things that were true – but detrimental to Leftism – “fake news” and censored them. While allowing obvious, blatant Leftist lies to stand and be shared utterly unobstructed.

The pre-Internet axiom was: “A lie can travel halfway around the world before the truth gets its boots on.”  Now with the Internet – and Big Tech’s Leftist lying censoriousness – it’s light years worse than that.

But it’s been months since Big Tech’s big lies helped un-elect Trump.  And the truth is finally starting to get its boots laced.

Trump just released a video listing TEN examples of either true stories Big Tech deemed “fake news” and censored – or fake stories Big Tech allowed to stand and be spread.

Please read this list.  And as you do, think of the millions of lives lost and harmed as a result of these lies and this censorship.  The trillions of dollars of wealth destroyed.  The election outcomes lyingly warped.

The list:

• Hydroxychloroquine is an effective treatment of – and prophylactic against – the China Virus.
• The Virus came from a Chinese lab – not a bat in a wet market.
• Hunter Biden’s laptop was real – not a Russian hoax.
• Trump did not clear Lafayette Square Park for a photo-op.
• The Russian bounty story in Afghanistan was a lie.
• Trump said the Virus vaccines would be ready in less than a year. Big Tech and everyone else deemed that “fake news” – and that it would take 3-5 years.  Multiple vaccines were ready in less than nine months.
• Blue States entered into extreme virus lockdowns. Red States did not.  Big Tech et al preemptively declared the lockdowns the only way to go – the more virulent and all-encompassing the better.  That Red States were putting millions of lives at risk.  Now the data is in – and none of Big Tech’s declarations were even remotely true.  The Red States were right.
• Trump and Republicans have all along said schools should be open. Because the science right away showed almost no children got sick – and none transmitted the virus.  Big Tech declared this heresy and “fake news.”
• Trump’s southern border policies were declared to be ineffective and anti-human. Even though illegal border crossings diminished dramatically – leading prospective crossers to decide not to come.  Biden reversed Trump’s regime.  And we now have a massive border crisis.  Illegal border crossings are up 1,400%.  Tens of thousands of children are living in squalor in makeshift housing – with tens of thousands of more surely coming.  Because Biden’s policies are tacit approval of their doing so.  And entering along with the people – are massive amounts of narcotics.
• We are FINALLY beginning to actually audit the actual voting in the 2020 election – beginning in Arizona. After months of Big Tech et al censoring any concern about illegal voting because it was “fake news” – does anyone who’s paid any attention at all totally dismiss the possibility that vote tally reversals will follow?

These are ten HUGE examples of Big Tech warping the news.  And American life.  All in the last four years – most in just the last year.

And it doesn’t include the Trump-Russia collusion hoax. The far-and-away greatest political scandal in US history.

Big Tech did all of this lying and censoring – in the name of their allegedly addressing “fake news.”

Big Tech should get out of the “fake news’ business.  Because they are AWFUL at it.

 

Here’s Why it was So Important for Democrats to Make Juneteenth a National Holiday…

By Jim Hoft
Published June 18, 2021 at 7:33pm
1248 Comments

 

When the Civil War ended, and after Republican President Abraham Lincoln liberated the slaves, Democrats initiated Jim Crow laws to punish blacks. Democrats discriminated against blacks. In fact, the KKK, was founded as the the terrorist wing of the Democrat Party.

The Ku Klux Klan assassinated many Republicans including Republican Representative James M. Hinds (December 5, 1833—October 22, 1868) of Little Rock. Hinds represented Arkansas in the United States Congress from June 24, 1868 through October 22, 1868 before his death.

The Ku Klux Klan was founded as the activist wing of the Democratic Party.

On September 28, 1868, a mob of Democrats massacred nearly 300 African-American Republicans in Opelousas, Louisiana. The savagery began when racist Democrats attacked a newspaper editor, a white Republican and schoolteacher for ex-slaves. Several African-Americans rushed to the assistance of their friend, and in response, Democrats went on a “Negro hunt,” killing every African-American (all of whom were Republicans) in the area they could find. (Via Grand Old Partisan)

Democrats in hoods slaughtered hundreds of Republicans and blacks across the country.
They beat and threatened and murdered Republicans for standing with the black man.

TRENDING: VIOLENCE BREAKS OUT at Denver Conservative Conference as Hundreds of Antifa Militants Threaten And Harass Drivers and Guests Outside Hotel

On April 20, 1871 the Republicans passed the anti-Ku Klux Klan Act outlawing Democratic terrorist groups.

The last KKK official to serve in Washington DC was former Senator Robert Byrd, a KKK kleagle. Byrd was a top Democrat and friend of Joe Biden.

In fact, throughout the Civil Rights era of the 19th and 20th century Democrats fought against freedom and rights for the black man.

The only blip of positive news during the 19th Century for Democrats was the long-forgotten Juneteenth celebration. After the Great Emancipator Abraham Lincoln was murdered by a Democrat his successor Andrew Johnson sent US troops to Galveston to free the slaves there in Texas.

This is the only bright spot for Democrats today in the entire history of civil rights in the 19th and most of the 20th centuries.

Hence, they made it a national holiday.
They had to.

Here is a brief history of the end of slavery and emancipation in the United States.
Via Michael Zak at Grand Old Partisan and later reposted at Free Republic:

September 22, 1862: Republican President Abraham Lincoln issues preliminary Emancipation Proclamation

January 1, 1863: Emancipation Proclamation, implementing the Republicans’ Confiscation Act of 1862, takes effect

The Democratic Party continues to Support Slavery.

February 9, 1864: Susan B. Anthony and Elizabeth Cady Stanton deliver over 100,000 signatures to U.S. Senate supporting Republicans’ plans for constitutional amendment to ban slavery

Advertisement - story continues below

June 15, 1864: Republican Congress votes equal pay for African-American troops serving in U.S. Army during Civil War

June 28, 1864: Republican majority in Congress repeals Fugitive Slave Acts

October 29, 1864: African-American abolitionist Sojourner Truth says of President Lincoln: “I never was treated by anyone with more kindness and cordiality than were shown to me by that great and good man”

January 31, 1865: 13th Amendment banning slavery passed by U.S. House with unanimous Republican support, intense Democrat opposition

Republican Party Support: 100% Democratic Party Support: 23%

March 3, 1865: Republican Congress establishes Freedmen’s Bureau to provide health care, education, and technical assistance to emancipated slaves

April 8, 1865: 13th Amendment banning slavery passed by U.S. Senate

Republican support 100% Democrat support 37%

June 19, 1865: On “Juneteenth,” U.S. troops land in Galveston, TX to enforce ban on slavery that had been declared more than two years before by the Emancipation Proclamation

November 22, 1865: Republicans denounce Democrat legislature of Mississippi for enacting “black codes,” which institutionalized racial discrimination

1866: The Republican Party passes the Civil Rights Act of 1866 to protect the rights of newly freed slaves

December 6, 1865: Republican Party’s 13th Amendment, banning slavery, is ratified

*1865: The KKK launches as the “Terrorist Arm” of the Democratic Party

February 5, 1866: U.S. Rep. Thaddeus Stevens (R-PA) introduces legislation, successfully opposed by Democrat President Andrew Johnson, to implement “40 acres and a mule” relief by distributing land to former slaves

April 9, 1866: Republican Congress overrides Democrat President Johnson’s veto; Civil Rights Act of 1866, conferring rights of citizenship on African-Americans, becomes law

April 19, 1866: Thousands assemble in Washington, DC to celebrate Republican Party’s abolition of slavery

May 10, 1866: U.S. House passes Republicans’ 14th Amendment guaranteeing due process and equal protection of the laws to all citizens; 100% of Democrats vote no

June 8, 1866: U.S. Senate passes Republicans’ 14th Amendment guaranteeing due process and equal protection of the law to all citizens; 94% of Republicans vote yes and 100% of Democrats vote no

July 16, 1866: Republican Congress overrides Democrat President Andrew Johnson’s veto of Freedman’s Bureau Act, which protected former slaves from “black codes” denying their rights

July 28, 1866: Republican Congress authorizes formation of the Buffalo Soldiers, two regiments of African-American cavalrymen

July 30, 1866: Democrat-controlled City of New Orleans orders police to storm racially-integrated Republican meeting; raid kills 40 and wounds more than 150

January 8, 1867: Republicans override Democrat President Andrew Johnson’s veto of law granting voting rights to African-Americans in D.C.

July 19, 1867: Republican Congress overrides Democrat President Andrew Johnson’s veto of legislation protecting voting rights of African-Americans

March 30, 1868: Republicans begin impeachment trial of Democrat President Andrew Johnson, who declared: “This is a country for white men, and by God, as long as I am President, it shall be a government of white men”

May 20, 1868: Republican National Convention marks debut of African-American politicians on national stage; two – Pinckney Pinchback and James Harris – attend as delegates, and several serve as presidential electors

1868 (July 9): 14th Amendment passes and recognizes newly freed slaves as U.S. Citizens

Republican Party Support: 94% Democratic Party Support: 0%

September 3, 1868: 25 African-Americans in Georgia legislature, all Republicans, expelled by Democrat majority; later reinstated by Republican Congress

September 12, 1868: Civil rights activist Tunis Campbell and all other African-Americans in Georgia Senate, every one a Republican, expelled by Democrat majority; would later be reinstated by Republican Congress

September 28, 1868: Democrats in Opelousas, Louisiana murder nearly 300 African-Americans who tried to prevent an assault against a Republican newspaper editor

October 7, 1868: Republicans denounce Democratic Party’s national campaign theme: “This is a white man’s country: Let white men rule”

October 22, 1868: While campaigning for re-election, Republican U.S. Rep. James Hinds (R-AR) is assassinated by Democrat terrorists who organized as the Ku Klux Klan

November 3, 1868: Republican Ulysses Grant defeats Democrat Horatio Seymour in presidential election; Seymour had denounced Emancipation Proclamation

December 10, 1869: Republican Gov. John Campbell of Wyoming Territory signs FIRST-in-nation law granting women right to vote and to hold public office

February 3, 1870: The US House ratifies the 15th Amendment granting voting rights to all Americans regardless of race

February 25, 1870: Hiram Rhodes Revels becomes the first Black seated in the US Senate, becoming the First Black in Congress and the first Black Senator.

May 19, 1870: African American John Langston, law professor and future Republican Congressman from Virginia, delivers influential speech supporting President Ulysses Grant’s civil rights policies

May 31, 1870: President U.S. Grant signs Republicans’ Enforcement Act, providing stiff penalties for depriving any American’s civil rights

June 22, 1870: Republican Congress creates U.S. Department of Justice, to safeguard the civil rights of African-Americans against Democrats in the South

September 6, 1870: Women vote in Wyoming, in FIRST election after women’s suffrage signed into law by Republican Gov. John Campbell

December 12, 1870: Republican Joseph Hayne Rainey becomes the first Black duly elected by the people and the first Black in the US House of Representatives

In 1870 and 1871, along with Revels (R-Miss) and Rainey (R-SC), other Blacks were elected to Congress from Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina and Virginia – all Republicans.

A Black Democrat Senator didn’t show up on Capitol Hill until 1993. The first Black Congressman was not elected until 1935.

February 28, 1871: Republican Congress passes Enforcement Act providing federal protection for African-American voters

March 22, 1871: Spartansburg Republican newspaper denounces Ku Klux Klan campaign to eradicate the Republican Party in South Carolina

April 20, 1871: Republican Congress enacts the (anti) Ku Klux Klan Act, outlawing Democratic Party-affiliated terrorist groups which oppressed African-Americans

*** You get the picture.

 

 

Why Doesn’t Soros and Clinton Connected Colorado Secretary of State Griswold Want a Forensic Audit In Her State? Because There’s Likely Lots of Fraud

By Joe Hoft
Published June 18, 2021 at 2:20pm 

Colorado’s Secretary of State is connected to Soros and Hillary Clinton money so it’s no surprise she doesn’t want a legitimate audit performed in her state.

Yesterday, Colorado Secretary of State Jena Griswold released a statement that claimed she would not allow outside auditors to come into Colorado and perform an election audit of the 2020 results in Colorado.

Maybe Griswold doesn’t want an audit in Colorado because then the citizens there would wake up and see their state’s election process is totally corrupt.  One very quick statistic tells us this.  In the 2020 Election, there were half a million more votes for Joe Biden than there were for Obama, Hillary, and President Trump.  Simply put, there is no way Biden had half a million more votes than Hillary.  No way.

TRENDING: EXPLOSIVE DEVELOPMENT: Election Worker Ralph Jones Is Now Caught Double-Counting Ballots at the State Farm Center on Election Night!

Griswold might not like an audit in Colorado which is why she was caught deleting the state’s Dominion Voting Machine’s 2015 Proposal of work off the Internet before she certified her state’s election results.

Maybe Griswald doesn’t want a legitimate audit because she was handpicked by the Soros/Hillary connected iVote Democrat nonprofit?

Griswald was picked along with the corrupt Secretary of States in Arizona (Hobbs) and Michigan (Benson).  All three of these picks were promoted by iVote:

Griswold comes across like an angel but like Hobbs and Benson, they will do anything to steal an election.

Former Fox News Host Back With A Shocking Interview. Click Here

Oxford Club

iVote is no angelic choir either.  Yesterday it tweeted the most disgusting lie that – the GOP are fighting to keep the right to vote from Black and brown Americans across the country.

It’s time to hold the demons related to Soros, Hillary, and iVote accountable.  Let’s see how much they cherish voter rights.  Let’s perform forensic audits in their states.

“Fraudits Have No Place in Colorado” – Democrat Colorado Secretary of State Issues Emergency Rules Prohibiting Election Audits

 “Fraudits Have No Place in Colorado” – Democrat Colorado Secretary of State Issues Emergency Rules Prohibiting Election Audits

By Cristina Laila
Published June 17, 2021 at 6:09pm

 

Jena Griswold

Democrat Colorado Secretary of State Jena Griswold on Thursday announced her office issued emergency rules prohibiting election audits.

“My office just issued rules prohibiting sham election audits in the State of Colorado. We will not risk the state’s election security nor perpetuate The Big Lie. Fraudits have no place in Colorado,” Griswold announced, taking a swipe at the Arizona audit.

TRENDING: EXPLOSIVE DEVELOPMENT: Election Worker Ralph Jones Is Now Caught Double-Counting Ballots at the State Farm Center on Election Night!

In Thursday’s press release, Griswold boasted that Colorado’s elections are considered the “safest in the nation.”

Full statement from Colorado Secretary of State’s office:

The Colorado Secretary of State’s Office today adopted emergency elections rules prohibiting third-parties from accessing voting equipment in the state of Colorado.

“Colorado’s elections are considered the safest in the nation, and we must remain steadfast in our dedication to security,” said Secretary of State Jena Griswold. “Along those lines, no third-party person or vendor will be permitted access to voting equipment in our state. We will not risk the state’s election security nor perpetuate The Big Lie. Sham audits have no place in Colorado.”

The new and amended rules, which have been implemented immediately, reinforce who can access state-certified voting systems. In order to access any component of a county’s voting system, a person must have passed a comprehensive criminal background check and be either an employee of the county clerk, an employee of the voting system provider, an employee of the Secretary of State’s Office, or an appointed election judge.

The rules further enable the Colorado Secretary of State’s Office to limit or prohibit the use of, as well as decertify, any voting systems component in the event of a break in its chain-of-custody or other hardware security compromises, such that its security and integrity can no longer be verified.

A third-party vendor with no election experience is currently performing a faulty, unsecure election audit in Arizona and calls for such sham audits have been spreading in other states. Several Colorado counties have been contacted by third parties offering to conduct audits. Colorado already administers post-election Risk Limiting Audits after every statewide election, which gives a statistical level of confidence that the outcome of an election is correct.