Monday, May 10, 2021

CALDARA | On transportation, we're getting played

CALDARA | On transportation, we're getting played

What absolute cowardice.

If there has ever been an example of lack of leadership and giving the middle finger to the expressed intent of the voters, the state Democrats' new “transportation” funding bill is it.

First some quick history. If you don’t fund roads, they don’t get built. So, Colorado used to fund roads.

We had a law that put about 10% of all state sales tax revenue into roads, guaranteed. This made good sense since, after public safety, road infrastructure and education are THE core functions of state government.

Then in 2009 the state legislature repealed that road-funding law and ripped that revenue stream away. Road funding dropped to nearly zero. It’s been that way ever since.

And what little funding roads do get is now diluted by transit — choo-choos, buses, bike paths and open space. Our roadways turned to Third-World quality. No one can act shocked.

At the same time our state budget has been ballooning thanks to Ref C, and a host of “fee” increases without voter consent like the FASTER fee, the mill levy freeze and the hospital provider fee. And now more money than we ever could have dreamed from the federal stimulus frenzy is deluging state government.

All this while Colorado’s highway infrastructure, that core function of government, goes purposefully unfunded, as if it were planned.

Now the legislature and our governor plan on rewarding this colossal failure of basic governance with a gargantuan tax increase. They figured by not funding roads, they can get more money from taxpayers to pay for it twice.

Economists call financially rewarding bad behavior a moral hazard. We can just call it getting played.

But wait. Haven’t the voters expressed clearly that they don’t want to raise taxes for this? Funny you ask. Why yes, they have, recently striking down both a tax increase for transportation funding and a debt increase for transportation by some 15 points each.

The message seemed pretty clear — hey legislature, fund transportation with the gobs of money we already give you, because that’s your damn job.

Well, like truculent children our leaders are going to raise the gas tax and taxes on delivery services against our expressed wishes. Good thing the Taxpayer’s Bill of Rights requires them to ask our permission first! Well, this tax increase is labeled as a “fee” to avoid asking our consent.

But wait you say, didn’t we just pass Prop 117 to stop them from this gambit of increasing taxes by calling them fees, without getting our expressed consent? Well, yes, we did. But they are planning to try yet another loophole to get away from consent.

They will “raise existing fees” instead of creating new ones. This game is too cute by half but given the Colorado Supreme Court’s hatred of TABOR they could well get away with it.

If the legislature arrogantly passes this bill, it will certainly result in a follow-up citizens' initiative to Prop 117 requiring voter consent for raising existing “fees.” It will also likely result in a citizen’s initiative to lower the gas tax by whatever they are raising it by and maybe even more. And they will pass.

This will be the voters’ way of AGAIN telling the legislature and this governor that NO MEANS NO!

This leaves the issue of a couple of squishy Republicans giving aid and comfort to this insult. Doing so they destroy the opportunity to show voters a difference between Republicans and Democrats in this state.

For instance, Springs Mayor Suthers has supported fee increases in the past, but to his credit he has always insisted it be brought to the voters first. He should demand that now.

I’ve heard them say that while Democrats are in charge this is the best deal they can get to fix our roads, that there isn’t any other choice. Really? We do have the citizen’s initiative. One such is in the works to return the old law that puts 10% of sales tax revenue back into roads.

These few conservatives will prevent Republicans from showing voters a bold, responsible and respectful way to take on Colorado’s challenges and give voters a reason to vote Republican.

Or they can play the supporting role to the Democrats’ tax increases without consent and enjoy being the minority party in perpetuity.

THIS IS BIG: US Census Bureau Confirms HUGE CONFLICT in Total Number of Voters in 2020 Election

THIS IS BIG: US Census Bureau Confirms HUGE CONFLICT in Total Number of Voters in 2020 Election

The results of the 2020 Election are again not supported by evidence.  This time the data reported by the Census Bureau conflicts with the election results.

According to the US Census Bureau’s results from the 2020 Census, their are obvious discrepancies with the results of the 2020 Election.

Via Election Wiz:

US Census data released last week called into question the official vote tally from the 2020 election. As part of the Census, the government collects data on citizens who self-report as having voted in presidential elections. The collected data shows an unusual anomaly in the reported results.

TRENDING: Maricopa County Elections Witness Testifies that Dominion Ran Entire Election - County Officials and Observers NEVER HAD Access or Passwords! (Video)

According to the Census, the recorded number of people voting in 2020 was tallied at 154,628,000. On the other hand, official results place the number of actual ballots cast slightly north of 158 million. That’s a discrepancy of nearly four million votes.

Speaking to pollster Richard Baris during an episode of “Inside the Numbers,” lawyer Robert Barnes said historically, the Census tends to “pin on the nose” the recorded vote numbers with the actual results. In other words, often the two data sets reasonably match.

Barnes is right. For example, the bureau was nearly spot-on in 2008, slightly under-reporting that 131,100,000 voted, while the official results showed 131,300,000 ballots cast.

The Election Wiz continues:

Of course, sometimes the Census has missed the mark. But for decades, in almost every case where the Census grossly botched the results, it was because the bureau over-recorded the number of those who voted.

Consider the following: In 1992, the Census over recorded the official results by slightly more than nine million. In 1996, the Census again over recorded the number of reported voters by roughly nine million. Similarly, the bureau recorded the number of those who voted in the 2004 election as 125 million, while official results placed the total at 122 million.

We now have multiple data markers that provide evidence the election results are not reasonable.

Friday, May 7, 2021

The New Nuremberg Trials 2021

The New Nuremberg Trials 2021 – Please Share this info!

The New Nuremberg Trials 2021

A team of over 1,000 lawyers and over 10,000 medical experts led by Dr. Reiner Fuellmich have begun legal proceedings against the CDC, WHO & the Davos Group for crimes against humanity. Fuellmich and his team present the faulty PCR test and the order for doctors to label any comorbidity death as a Covid death as fraud. The PCR test was never designed to detect pathogens and is 100% faulty at 35 cycles. All the PCR tests overseen by the CDC are set at 37 to 45 cycles. The CDC admits that any tests over 28 cycles are not admissible for a positive reliable result. This alone invalidates over 90% of the alleged covid cases / ”infections” tracked by the use of this faulty test.

In addition to the flawed tests and fraudulent death certificates, the “experimental” vaccine itself is in violation of Article 32 of the Geneva Convention. Under Article 32 of the 1949 Geneva Convention IV, “mutilation and medical or scientific experiments not necessitated by the medical treatment of a protected person” are prohibited. According to Article 147, conducting biological experiments on protected persons is a grave breach of the Convention.

The “experimental” vaccine is in violation of all 10 of the Nuremberg Codes which carry the death penalty for those who seek to violate these International Laws.

The “vaccine” fails to meet the following five requirements to be considered a vaccine and is by definition a medical “experiment” and trial:

Provides immunity to the virus
This is a “leaky” gene therapy that does not provide immunity to Covid and claims to reduce symptoms yet double-vaccinated are now 60% of the patients requiring ER or ICU with covid infections.

Protects recipients from getting the virus
This gene-therapy does not provide immunity and double-vaccinated can still catch and spread the virus.

Reduces deaths from the virus infection
This gene-therapy does not reduce deaths from the infection. Double-Vaccinated infected with Covid have also died.

Reduces circulation of the virus
This gene-therapy still permits the spread of the virus as it offers zero immunity to the virus.

Reduces transmission of the virus
This gene-therapy still permits the transmission of the virus as it offers zero immunity to the virus.

The following violations of the Nuremberg Code are as follows:

Nuremberg Code #1: Voluntary Consent is Essential

No person should be forced to take a medical experiment without informed consent. Many media, political and non-medical persons are telling people to take the shot. They offer no information as to the adverse effects or dangers of this gene-therapy. All you hear from them is – “ safe and effective” and “ benefits outweigh the risks.” Countries are using lockdowns, duress and threats to force people to take this vaccine or be prohibited to participate in free society under the mandate of a Vaccine Passport or Green Pass. During the Nuremberg trials, even the media was prosecuted and members were put to death for lying to the public, along with many of the doctors and Nazis found guilty of Crimes Against Humanity.

Nuremberg Code #2: Yield Fruitful Results Unprocurable By Other Means

As listed above, the gene-therapy does not meet the criteria of a vaccine and does not offer immunity to the virus. There are other medical treatments that yield fruitful results against Covid such as Ivermectin, Vitamin D, Vitamin C, Zinc and boosted immune systems for flu and colds.

Nuremberg Code #3: Base Experiments on Results of Animal Experimentation and Natural History of Disease

This gene therapy skipped animal testing and went straight to human trials. In mRNA research that Pfizer used – a candidate study on mRNA with rhesus macaques monkeys using BNT162b2 mRNA and in that study all the monkeys developed pulmonary inflammation but the researchers considered the risk low as these were young healthy monkeys from the age of 2-4. Israel has used Pfizer and the International Court of Law has accepted a claim for 80% of the recipients having pulmonary inflammation from being injected with this gene-therapy. Despite this alarming development Pfizer proceeded to develop their mRNA for Covid without animal testing.

Nuremberg Code #4: Avoid All Unnecessary Suffering and Injury

Since the rollout of the experiment and listed under the CDC VAERS reporting system over 4,000 deaths and 50,000 vaccine injuries have been reported in America. In the EU over 7,000 deaths and 365,000 vaccine injuries have been reported. This is a grievous violation of this code.


Nuremberg Code #5: No Experiment to be Conducted if There’s Reason to Think Injury or Death Will Occur

See #4, based on fact-based medical data this gene-therapy is causing death and injury. Past research on mRNA also shows several risks that have been ignored for this current trial gene-experiment. A 2002 study on SARS-CoV-1 spike proteins showed they cause inflammation, immunopathology, blood clots, and impede Angiotensin 2 expression. This experiment forces the body to produce this spike-protein inheriting all these risks.

Nuremberg Code #6: Risk Should Never Exceed the Benefit

Covid-19 has a 98-99% recovery rate. The vaccine injuries, deaths and adverse side-effects of mRNA gene-therapy far exceed this risk. The use of “leaky” vaccines was banned for agriculture use by the US and EU due to the Marek Chicken study that shows ‘hot-viruses’ and variants emerge… making the disease even more deadly. Yet, this has been ignored for human use by the CDC knowing fully the risk of new deadlier variants emerge from leaky vaccinations. The CDC is fully aware that the use of leaky vaccines facilitates the emergence of hot (deadlier)strains. Yet they’ve ignored this when it comes to human

Nuremberg Code #7: Preparation Must Be Made Against Even Remote Possibility of Injury, Disability or Death

There were no preparations made. This gene therapy skipped animal trials. The pharmaceutical companies’ own Phase 3 human clinical trials will not conclude until 2022 /2023. These vaccines were approved under an Emergency Use only act and forced on a misinformed public. They are NOT FDA-approved.

Nuremberg Code #8: Experiment Must Be Conducted by Scientifically Qualified Persons

Politicians, media and actors claiming that this is a safe and effective vaccine are not qualified. Propaganda is not medical science. Many retail outlets such as Walmart & drive-through vaccine centers are not qualified to administer experimental medical gene-therapies to the uninformed public.

Nuremberg Code #9: Anyone Must Have the Freedom to Bring the Experiment to an End At Any Time

Despite the outcry of over 85,000 doctors, nurses, virologists and epidemiologists – the experiment is not being ended. In fact, there are currently many attempts to change laws in order to force vaccine compliance. This includes mandatory and forced vaccinations. Experimental ‘update’ shots are planned for every 6 months without any recourse to the growing number of deaths and injuries already caused by this experiment. These ‘update’ shots will be administered without any clinical trials. Hopefully this new Nuremberg Trial will put an end to this crime against humanity.

Nuremberg Code #10: The Scientist Must Bring the Experiment to an End At Any Time if There’s Probable Cause of it Resulting in Injury or Death

It is clear in the statistical reporting data that this experiment is resulting in death and injury yet all the politicians, drug companies and so-called experts are not making any attempt to stop this gene-therapy experiment from inflicting harm on a misinformed public.

What can you do to help put an end to this crime against humanity? Share this information. Hold your politicians, media, doctors and nurses accountable – that if they are complicit in this crime against humanity they too are subject to the laws set forth in the Geneva Convention and Nuremberg Code and can be tried, found guilty and put to death. Legal proceedings are moving forward, evidence has been collected and a large growing body of experts are sounding the alarm.

Visit the Covid Committee website at: https://corona-ausschuss.de/ and if you have been affected by this crime, report the event, persons involved, and as much detail to the following website:

https://www.securewhistleblower.com/

Crimes against humanity affect us all. They are a crime against you, your children, your parents, your grandparents, your community and your country and your future.

Wednesday, May 5, 2021

1984 vs. Brave New World: Which Dystopian Nightmare Is Likelier to Come True?

1984 vs. Brave New World: Which Dystopian Nightmare Is Likelier to Come True?


by TDB
Tuesday, May 04, 2021 - 13:53

by Ben Bartee via The Daily Bell

That the global human population is hurdling towards dystopia at breakneck speed is a foregone conclusion by this point. The tea leaves read “red” with human pain and suffering.

The deeper question remains: will the coming authoritarian hellscape be more Mad-Max–kill-rape-pillage-scorched-Earth style or more lobotomized-institutionalized-submissive-heavily-medicated style?

.

OR…

?

In dystopian literary terms, will the horrific anti-human engineered society of tomorrow more resemble the vision of George Orwell’s 1984 or Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World?

I read the first quarter of 1984, for the first time, at 15 years of age in the shed behind my father’s house in Topeka, Kansas on top of the family lawnmower. His wife at the time had banished me from the house, so there I sat at dusk under dim light from a single light bulb in the corner. Things were dark.

The human misery of Winston’s world leapt from the pages in crystal-clear notes.

“1984” in everyday parlance is synonymous with the ethos of that novel’s brutal ruling class. The prevailing ideology of the state depicted by Orwell was summarized in its arguably most haunting quote, delivered by agent of state O’Brien as he tortures the protagonist Winston:

“If you want a vision of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face – forever.”

Police state rule-by-cop is the standard concern when most civil libertarians discuss authoritarian overreach because it is the most visible, most obvious form of government power grab.

The Party of 1984 (the state) pursues power not as a means to an end but as an end entirely of itself: the “pressing forever” on the nerve of power:

“That is the world that we are preparing, Winston. A world of victory after victory, triumph after triumph after triumph: an endless pressing, pressing, pressing upon the nerve of power.”

It is violent and, beyond that, celebratory of violence in a religious fashion that is the rawest expression of state power. Rather than words, which Big Brother seeks to ultimately eliminate, brutality is the native language of the Party in Orwell’s visions.

As history has repeatedly demonstrated, though, raw force alone has never, so far, proven sufficient to maintain control over a population forever.

Eventually, no volume or degree of brutality visited upon the population, nor tactical infiltration of subversive elements, nor any amount of censorship can hold back the state’s inevitable destruction at the hands of an enraged populace.

This is the premise on which Orwell and Huxley part ways in their predictions of what form future totalitarianism will take:

“A really efficient totalitarian state would be one in which the all-powerful executive of political bosses and their army of managers control a population of slaves who do not have to be coerced, because they love their servitude.”

-Aldous Huxley, Brave New World

In a remarkable letter penned to Orwell following the publication of 1984, Huxley further explains this theoretical divergence:

“Within the next generation I believe that the world’s rulers will discover that… the lust for power can be just as completely satisfied by suggesting people into loving their servitude as by flogging and kicking them into obedience.”

-Aldous Huxley, 1949

History explains this split in part. George Orwell gained his political insights, which were undeniable in their piercing illumination laid bare by the plain language of his writing, from his time spent serving the British Empire in the waning days of its global dominance.

His vision of the ruling class of Oceania was ripped from the pages of British colonial history – just taken to its logical absurd and brutal conclusion.

Contrarily, Huxley ran in the circles of the behavioral science wing of the ruling class that oversaw the Industrial Revolution – the ones obsessed with the unprecedented potential of Pavlovian conditioning applied at scale to control entire populations.

This is where Huxley’s vision – arguably more horrific than the brutality of life in 1984’s Oceania – bears fruit in the modern context. Rule through brutality (the central modus operandi of 1984’s Inner Party) is the past. The future ruling class, as Huxley illustrated, will instead prop itself up through social conditioning and medicalization:

“Medicalization can be defined as the process by which some aspects of human life come to be considered as medical problems, whereas before they were not considered pathological.”

Toxic masculinity, white fragility, five distinct classes of anxiety disorders, 7 classes of depression, “gender dysphoria” even in children as young as 2 years old – these are the products of medicalization.

In Brave New World, the entire population takes a fictitious sedative called Soma multiple times a day. It is the cure for any pain or discomfort, no matter how mild:

“She had inconspicuously swallowed half a gramme of soma, with the result that she could now sit, serenely not listening, thinking of nothing at all, but with her large blue eyes fixed on the Warden’s face in an expression of rapt attention.”

This sounds familiar, you may think to yourself. In 21st century America, we almost instinctively look to a “mental healthcare professional” for help with nihilism and despair and uncertainty; in turn, they medicate you.

The US population is awash in prescription drugs to heal spiritual black holes. Every year, millions of Americans fill prescriptions for psychotropic drugs like Xanax, Valium, Ativan, Klonopin, Lexapro, Effexor, Zoloft, Adderall, Abilify – “ask your doctor” about [fill in the blank]. And yet, despite spending more per capita on healthcare than any nation on Earth, we remain in spiritual psychosis.

For your problems, you get an avalanche of pills down your throat and injections into your veins. If one “healthcare solution” won’t work, they prescribe another. And another, until you are numb. Until you transition into the walking dead, a shadow of your former self. Until you are subdued, docile. Until you are compliant.

The new face of God in our Brave New World

This is spiritual warfare. And the slaves taken in the silent conquest don’t know they are captured, living out their lives in ignorant, medicated bliss.

The evil genius of the social engineers is on full display in the sad “just vaccinated” profile pictures of those who have grown to love their servitude and in the slew of pill bottles littering your mother’s medicine cabinet.

Read the worthy Brave New World — and learn for whom and to what end you suffer. Then, kill your masters as proper repayment for the future they stole from you.

Ben Bartee is a Bangkok-based American journalist with opposable thumbs. Contact him via his portfolio or on LinkedIn.

You can help protect us from BIG TECH DE-PLATFORMING by joining our email list.

This is the single biggest way to ensure we can't be silenced for speaking out against censorship, and the elite/ cabal's plans for a "Great Reset"-- their New World Order meant to render you impoverished and powerless.

Tuesday, May 4, 2021

Facebook

• The New Deal did not solve the economic crisis of the Great Depression. New Deal programs made the economic crisis of the Great Depression deeper and longer.
• The War on Poverty was not victorious over poverty in the United States. The War on Poverty made the problem of poverty worse by incentivizing idleness, dependency, and irresponsibility.
• The War on Drugs did not solve the problem of substance abuse in the United States. Rates of abuse for some drugs are at historic highs right now.
• The Department of Education did not improve schools in the United States. Education results have been declining since the Department of Education was created.
• The Affordable Care Act did not improve health care or make it more affordable. It made health care more expensive while making innovation more difficult.
• The Dodd–Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act didn’t create more competition among banks — it reduced competition and created near monopolies for big national banks — and it doesn’t protect consumers.
All these progressive government programs and institutions have two important things in common:
1. Each failed to achieve the publicly marketed goals.
2. Each was a smashing success when measured by their REAL progressive goals:
• Expand the power and scope of government.
• Expand government control over citizens.
• Restrict the liberty of citizens.
• Take more money from citizens.
• Increase the number of Americans employed by government.
• Increase the number of Americans paying government employee unions.
• Increase the amount of money government employee unions launder and funnel to the political campaigns of progressive politicians.
Understand that the marketing labels and brands of progressive government programs and policies are NEVER what those programs and policies are all about, and you will be truly “woke.”
Ignore the distractions, the empty promises, and the emphases on supposed good intentions over measurable results, while watching government grow and grow and grow -- see that EVERY solution offered by progressives to EVERY problem, real or imagined, requires more government power -- and THAT is taking the red pill and seeing power-hungry progressive politicians for what they truly are.

Sunday, May 2, 2021

Colorado Fraud - 450,000 New Voters, 100% went to Biden ? Stats and Math Matter!

Colorado Fraud - 450,000 New Voters, 100% went to Biden ? Stats and Math Matter!

Here is some election analysis about Colorado voter data which is stunning.  Colorado was already a mail in vote state that mailed out ballots.

COLORADO POPULATION AND VOTER FACT CHECK

  1. The population of Colorado in 2020 was 5,807,719, a 0.85% increase from 2019.
  2. The population of Colorado in 2019 was 5,758,486, a 1.08% increase from 2018.
  3. The population of Colorado in 2018 was 5,697,155, a 1.42% increase from 2017.
  4. The population of Colorado in 2017 was 5,617,421, a 1.33% increase from 2016.
*Accordingly, the population of Colorado increases by roughly 1-1.5% per year

** Nationwide - Trump Boosted his Hispanic and Latino Vote except in Colorado. Colorado has over 1 million that identify as Hispanic and Latino Voters and also Italian-Latins.
THE 2020 ELECTION IN COLORADO 1) 3.2 million voted in 2020 in Colorado Statewide. Colorado already had mail in voting to everyone. Thus, there should have been no vast difference in voting from 2016, 2018 to 2020 2) 3.2 Million votes in Colorado is an increase in 600,000 voters in 2 years since Gov. Polis of Colorado was elected in 2018. 3) Stunningly, Mr. Biden got 1,804,352 votes in 2020 which is essentially 450,000 more new votes than anyone has ever received. A Whopping 33% better than Obama and Clinton. 4) Trump got 1,364,607 votes in Colorado in 2020. Trump increased his votes from 2016 by over 150,000 votes from 2016.  Interestingly, Trump did better this year than both Obama , Clinton and Polis when they ran. 
5) Dominion opened its headquarters in Denver in 2009, and 62 out of 64 Colorado counties use the Dominion election counting services and products.
https://www.westword.com/news/dominion-voting-services-trump-voting-fraud-denver-11845357
6) More than 3.2 million ballots  for a turnout rate of about 85 percent where Colorado had the highest turnout in the country.
THE 2018 ELECTION IN COLORADO 2.4 million voted in state elections in 2018.  Gov. Polis got 1,348,888 votes to win the Statewide Governors election. Trump won more than this in 2020.
THE 2016 ELECTION IN COLORADO 1) 2.7 Million voted in statewide elections in 2016 in Colorado.  2) In 2016, Clinton got 1,338,870 votes in CO which is essentially the same number that Polis got to win in 2018. 3) Trump got 1,202,484 Colorado votes in 2016. Clinton did not win a plurality of votes in Colorado in 2016, but won Colorado with 48% of the vote.   Also, Obama never received more than 1,323,101 votes in Colorado which is essentially the same as Hillary.
SUMMARY OF COLORADO STATISTICAL VOTER ANOMALIES COLORADO POPULATION AND VOTER FACT CHECK
In sum, the population of Colorado increases by 1-1.5% per year.  However, Biden's voter increase above other famous democrats such as Obama or Clinton from years: (2016/18) to 2020, is a Whopping = 33.3333% increase in votes over Clinton, Obama and Governor Polis.  Where did Biden get the extra 450,000 ballots? in a state that has only grown by only (about 200,000) people while Trump also increased his margin by 150,000 people of which 1,364,607 Trump votes is above both Hillary and Obama's best performances?
While Trump increased his Colorado support in 2020 by almost 150,000 people in Colorado, Mr. Biden was somehow allotted another 450,000 votes (a 33% Percent Increase) whilst the population in Colorado has not increased but about: 50-1200,000 people over the last 5 years. To increase concern even further, one Colorado Trump rally was said to be composed of a whopping 17% democrat supporters.

Remember 2 things: Biden got 100% of the increase in votes over 1.35 Million. Biden got 450 thousand extra votes. That is like getting every voter from a 1 million person city. Trump received all the votes from 2016 plus the libertarian votes to put Trump higher than Clinton, Obama and Polis. However, Trump's 1.35 million votes must have triggered an increase in votes for Biden; however, nobody knows where or how an extra 450,000 votes came from.

In sum, it is statistically impossible for an extra 450,000 votes to appear in a state that has always had mass-mail-voting. Further, if 450,000 new votes are enterered into a "data set" or "scatter chart", it would also be impossible for all 450,000 votes to go to one candidate.

Saturday, May 1, 2021

Dr. Douglass Frank

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yd07p6DJID4&t=8s

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OasXgYkiqAc&t=2273s

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UwbFLTq-7MU

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nwqV6A3Dv3A

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vphJjaYYRQI

  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s1XerxQG-Yc&t=35s

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zhyDh-dLzcE

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ox13scpSEI8