Saturday, April 29, 2017

Ben Carson Uncovers 50 Year-Old Welfare Rule, Busts A GENIUS Move For Average Americans!

Ben Carson Uncovers 50 Year-Old Welfare Rule, Busts A GENIUS Move For Average Americans! 

Ben Carson Uncovers 50 Year-Old Welfare Rule, Busts A GENIUS Move For Average Americans!

If you’ve ever visited a nature reserve, you’ve likely seen the signs warning you not to feed any wild animals. Besides being dangerous, it can also make the animals dependent on humans for food.
This warning holds true for humans as well. Many Americans take advantage of taxpayers by staying on welfare indefinitely rather than seeking employment, knowing that no matter what they do they will have a handout from the government every month.
HUD Secretary Ben Carson holds the radical belief that the ultimate goal of government welfare programs is to give people a hand up, not a hand out.
Because of this mentality, liberals have predictably attacked his stance, saying he doesn’t understand the plight of those in government housing, despite the fact that Carson grew up in poverty himself.
Ignoring the naysayers, Dr. Carson has thrown himself into his new role by thoroughly researching all manner of ways to help those in government housing find a way out of it.
After uncovering a 50-year-old rule, he may have found the key to doing just that.
From Western Journalism:
HUD will require that contractors who build projects funded by HUD to work with the communities where those projects are being built to employ local low-income residents.
“We’re going to put much more emphasis on Section 3, which requires HUD builders to use low-income residents as employees during the construction of these various developments and in the redevelopment of places,” Carson said on The Joe Pags Show, referring to a law created in 1968.
“It’s largely ignored right now. We’re going to change that by emphasizing it in a different way and incentivizing people to use it,” Carson said.
Carson believes low-income citizens have been lured into complacency by receiving welfare and are failing to live up to their true God-given potential. By helping to build their communities, these citizens will not only learn how to take pride in their work.
They will also learn valuable construction skills that they can use to find other good jobs.
“If you give them those skills, you’re giving them something that they can carry with them for the rest of their lives,” Carson said.
Dr. Carson isn’t willing to just put a band-aid on poverty. He wants to find a solution to reduce it, which is the opposite of what most Democrats want to do.

Most Misquoted and Most Misunderstood Science Papers in the Public Domain.

Most Misquoted and Most Misunderstood Science Papers in the Public Domain.

The Most Misquoted and Most Misunderstood Science Papers in the Public Domain.

Abstract.

I have reproduced the full text of a number of articles that seem to be chronically misquoted or misunderstood. This is possibly because access is difficult, and so my objective is that by improving access, perhaps the many people who misquote these papers will endeavour to read what is written before citing it. Fourier, putatively the father of the "Greenhouse Effect" says something quite different in the text of his work (Fourier, 1824; Fourier, 1827; Burgess, 1837). Tyndall (1861), who first proposes the radiation trap on which the "Greenhouse Effect" is based, not only misquotes Fourier but bases his own heat transfer theory on the assumption of luminiferous aether - an idea Fourier impled might change substantially. Moreover, Tyndall confused opacity and absorption, in spite of the significant visible reflection presented by chlorine gas - which he examined. This is perhaps because he neglected to consider gaseous reflection of wavelengths outside the visible spectrum. Tyndall is celebrated as the scientist who proved the "Greenhouse Effect" when in actual fact, his work on the infrared absorption of gases failed to address absorption as opposed to opacity. Moreover, his speculations on climate were hypothetical and rooted in his own aethereal heat transfer mechanism, which was refuted in 1887. Moving on from the "Greenhouse Effect" to natural sources of carbon dioxide, Gerlach (1991) is spectacularly misrepresented as a tally of measured volcanic carbon dioxide emissions. In fact, Gerlach (1991) is a guess based on a grand total of seven subaerial volcano emission measurements, three hydrothermal vent site emission measurements, and corroboration with even more tenuous estimates available at the time.

Introduction

In a very interesting paper demonstrating the real, rather than imagined, origins of key elements in folk tradition, Luciani (2013) opens with a quotation, concerning folklore, which is strangely relevant to the behaviour of some modern scientists:
the mediæval story-teller is pillaging an antiquity of which he does not fully possess the secret; he is like a peasant building his hut on the site of Halicarnassus or Ephesus; he builds, but what he builds is full of materials of which he knows not the history, or knows by a glimmering tradition merely; stones ‘not of this building’, but of an older architecture
This quote, from Arnold (1867, p. 61), could just as easily be said of the modern scientists, of certain political persuasion, who are pillaging an antiquity of which they do not possess the secret; they are like a peasant building his hut on the site of Halicarnassus or Epesus; they build their science but what they build is full of conceptual underpinning of which they neither know the history nor the facts. At most, such scientists know the meagrest glimmering tradition concerning these texts which they have not even bothered to read themselves and, as such, their science is not of modern science, but of an older conjecture. Unlike the peasant's hut, this is a profound problem for science and, it is for the demonstration of this problem, that I showcase some of the most misquoted literature in the sciences; so that you may read for yourself, what the "experts" did not bother to read, before citing it.

Fourier

Fourier (1824) is often confused with Fourier (1827). Although the typesetting for Fourier (1827) indicates the possibility of an earlier printing in 1824, this dissertation is less specific than Fourier (1824), and includes a number of major additions to the text. The original typesetting of Fourier (1827) indicates the possibility that it may have been published in an 1824 broadsheet. However, as no earlier printing of Fourier (1827) has been produced, it cannot be established that it was, in fact, published in 1824. Volume 7 of Mémoires de l'Académie royale des sciences de l'Institut de France provides the only printing of this article in extant, and this volume was not published until 1827. Hence, the alleged earlier printing of Fourier's 1827 dissertation, is unsubstantiated. More importantly, referring to Fourier (1827) via an unknown and unsubstantiated publication whose very existence is in question, only serves to mislead and misdirect readers away from much more accessible editions of this paper.
According to Weart (2003), Flannery (2005) and Archer (2009), the "Greenhouse Effect" originates with Fourier. However, the point of republishing Fourier (1824) and Fourier (1827) is so that you can see for yourself, that the cornerstone of the "Greenhouse Effect", namely the backradiation mechanism speculated by Pouillet, is not even alluded to by Fourier, who maintained that closed spaces such as hotboxes (and by extension greenhouses) retained their heat by cutting off circulation with the cooler atmosphere. I am not the first author to discover this by reading Fourier's work for myself (Fleming, 1999; Gerlich & Tscheuschner, 2007; Gerlich & Tscheuschner, 2009), and one may be tempted to ask why authors continue to propagate the misinformation that Fourier fathered the "Greenhouse Effect" when it is clear from his own pen that he did not. Perhaps it has something to do with the fact that Fourier is historically misquoted and misrepresented with respect to the "Greenhouse Effect". Citing Fourier (1827), Arrhenius claimed:
Fourier maintained that the atmosphere acts like the glass of a hothouse, because it lets through the light rays of the sun but retains the dark rays from the ground.
Arrhenius (1896, p. 237)
Fourier (1824, p. 154) and Fourier (1827, p. 586) pointed out that a hotbox works by preventing the replenishment of warm air with cooler air, which is a natural atmospheric process that later came to be known as convection. Moreover, this mechanism is enhanced by the poor thermal concuctivity of the materials from which the hotbox is constructed to slow the conduction of heat into the atmosphere. It is not hard to see why Fourier's dissertation completely contradicts Arrhenius' claim when we consider the fact that Fourier was subsequently forced to invoke an impossible hypothetical in order to relate the atmosphere to De Saussure's experimental apparatus:
In short, if all the strata of air of which the atmosphere is formed, preserved their density with their transparency, and lost only the mobility which is peculiar to them, this mass of air, thus become solid, on being exposed to the rays of the sun, would produce an effect the same in kind with that we have just described.
Fourier, in fact, was using the applicability of his calculus to De Saussure's (1779) results in an attempt to extend the scope of his method to include the calculation of atmospheric temperature. In this endeavour, Fourier focuses on the key difference between the mechanisms governing temperature in a hotbox, and those governing temperature in the atmosphere. In doing so, Fourier goes on suggest that what we now call convection only affects the magnitude of net heat flow or thermal conduction. Nevertheless, Fourier is misquoted by Tyndall who made the following claim:
Hence the differential action, as regards the heat coming from the sun to the earth and that radiated from the earth into space, is vastly augmented by the aqueous vapour of the atmosphere. De Saussure, Fourier, M. Pouillet, and Mr. Hopkins regard this interception of terrestrial rays as exercising the most important influence on climate.
Although it looks similar and may well have inspired Tyndall, what Fourier said was actually quite different:
The heat of the sun, coming in the form of light, possesses the property of penetrating transparent solids or liquids, and loses this property entirely, when by communication with terrestrial bodies, it is turned into heat radiating without light.
According to Fourier, above, non-luminous heat cannot be transmitted back to space through the atmosphere because it has "lost entirely" this property of luminous heat to "penetrate" the atmosphere. As we have seen, Fourier considers the motion of the atmosphere to be the primary vector for the dissipation of the dark heat back into space. Moreover, he is discussing net heat transfer, namely thermal conduction, and not just radiation. In this case, Fourier continues with, "This distinction of luminous and non-luminous heat, explains the elevation of temperature caused by transparent bodies." This explanation, in the context of Fourier's discussion of net heat flow through the atmosphere by thermal conduction, is obviously referring to heat concentration via transparent insulation (dubbed, "the Blanket Effect" by Abbot, 1909, p. 35), as opposed to Tyndall's differential radiation mechanism. Fourier goes on to clarify this by consistently specifying the primary importance of convective processes, with the insulating properties of transparent materials noted as only of secondary importance:
The theory of the instrument is easily understood. It is sufficient to remark, 1st, that the acquired heat is concentrated, because it is not dissipated immediately by renewing the air; 2nd, that the heat of the sun, has properties different from those of heat without light.
...
The mobility of the air, which is rapidly displaced in every direction, and which rises when heated, and the radiation of non-luminous heat into the air, diminish the intensity of the effects which would take place in a transparent and solid atmosphere
As you can see, Fourier regards convection as the most important influence on atmospheric temperature, other than the three sources of heat he lists at the outset. Moreover, Fourier only addresses radiation independently of net heat transfer in the context of saying that, at the time, we did not know enough to say anything:
We might, doubtless, suppose radiating heat to possess properties hitherto unknown, which might, in some way, take the form of this fundamental temperature, which we attribute to space. But in the present state of physical science, all known facts are naturally explained without having recourse to other properties than those derived from actual observation.
The supposition of the time was that light was propagated as waves through the luminiferous aether, which Fourier very carefully avoided mentioning and, moreover, seems to have made the prophetic suggestion that we may yet have something to learn about the propagation of light and heat through space.
Contrary to the claims of Svante Arrhenius and many subsequent "Greenhouse Effect" authors, Fourier did not think that air was like the glass of a greenhouse. Fourier explicitly states that in order for air to act as it does in hotboxes such as De Saussure's, it would have to solidify in layers sufficient to stop the motion of the air - without altering its thermal or optical properties. In fact, the reason why Fourier cites the De Saussure experiment is to offer empirical evidence that confirms the applicability of his calculus (later known as Fourier's Law) to air. This is clearly apparent in Fourier (1824, p. 154, ¶. 2) and Fourier (1827, p. 586, ¶. 1). Moreover, this idea is extended with Fourier (1824, p. 155, ¶. 1) and Fourier (1827, p. 587, ¶. 1) in an attempt to include the atmosphere. Here Fourier argues that while the motion of the air diminishes the warmth due to the preferential penetration of "bright heat", this does not entirely change the character of this effect, namely a thermal gradient or lapse rate not dissimilar in character to that observed in De Saussure's experiment. Fourier's claims concerning the applicability of his calculus to heat flow in the atmosphere are confirmed by the constant mean lapse rate we observe in the convecting troposphere.
With respect to the "Greenhouse Effect", so commonly misattributed to Fourier, the fact that the backradiation from the glass did not prevent Fourier's calculus from corroborating De Saussure's results proves that heat distribution between the earth's surface and the atmosphere is a question of conductive transfer and not of radiative transfer. What we may learn from this is that calculation of heat flow using radiative transfer (the Stefan-Boltzmann Law - Bolzmann, 1884) is only valid when the heat flow in question is between bodies that are not in thermal contact. After all, Fourier had no way of excluding this mode of heat transfer, when he developed his heat flow calculus from empirical methods limited to the observation of heat flow between bodies in thermal contact.

Tyndall

Tyndall (1861) is not so much misquoted as quoted out of context. Many authors studiously avoid discussing Tyndall's errors and particularly the fact that Tyndall's differential radiation hypothesis is based on his idea of aethereal heat transfer. Tyndall (1861) is most significant as a historical example of what modern university students describe with the saying, "fake it until you make it." The paper is filled with technical buzz-words of the time, some of which are totally misused. As we have seen, moreover, Tyndall misattributes his differential radiation principle to Fourier, perhaps because Fourier's transparent insulation theory was an inspiration, or perhaps because Tyndall confused it with his own idea. This pattern of equating very different phenomena on the basis of purely apparent similarity is the most striking feature of Tyndall's 1861 paper.
Tyndall misuses the word absorb, and its derivatives, a total of 148 times throughout his dissertation. Opacity and transparency are determined by simply measuring the passage of radiation through the substance in question. In order to measure absorptivity, it is necessary to eliminate the portion of opacity due to reflection (e.g. Nicolau & Maluf, 2001). This can only be done by measuring the reflection of the material in question as well as the transmission, and then subtracting the reflection from the observed opacity. Tyndall very clearly describes in complete detail, his method of measuring the passage of radiation through a chamber of gas. Nowhere does Tyndall mention measuring the component of radiation reflected by the gases he examines which, in such a detailed account, cannot be said to have been done. This is in spite of Tyndall's having handled chlorine gas, which is coloured by its reflection of visible light. It is clear that Tyndall measured opacity and relative opacity, not absorptivity and absorption as he seems to claim. In fact, Tyndall uses the terms "opacity" and "absorbing power" interchangably throughout his work. This is indicative of a fundamental misunderstanding, which is nonetheless studiously avoided by nearly all authors who claim that Tyndall's work proved the "Greenhouse Effect". In fact, it was another fundamental misunderstanding that lead to the proposition of the "Greenhouse Effect".
I have already adduced considerations which show that the molecules of rock-salt glide with facility through the ether; but the ease of motion which these molecules enjoy must facilitate their mutual collision. Their motion, instead of being expended on the ether which exists between them, and communicated by it to the external ether, is in great part transferred directly from particle to particle, or in other words, is freely conducted. When a molecule of alum, on the contrary, approaches a neighbour molecule, it produces a swell on the intervening ether of space, which swell is in part transmitted, not to the molecules, but to the general ether of space, and thus lost as regards conduction. This lateral waste prevents the motion from penetrating the alum to any great extent, and the substance is what we all a bad conductor.
Above is Tyndall's idea of aethereal heat transfer, one of the dirty secrets of the "Greenhouse Effect". Here, Tyndall assumes that any radiative transfer is lost to conduction and this is a significant derivative expression of the myth that radiative transfer (between the molecules of a material) does not contribute to conductive transfer. This assumption propagated into Arrhenius' work such that Arrhenius (1896, p. 255) adds radiation within a material (e.g. the atmosphere) to the net heat flow or thermal conduction of the material (e.g. the atmosphere), thereby duplicating the proportion of heat accumulating due to radiative transfer, in accordance with the amount of carbon dioxide present. However, considering quantum mechanics, inasmuch as heat may be transferred from molecule to molecule by molecular collision, it may also be transfered from molecule to molecule by emission of a photon or phonon due to a falling electron potential, which is subsequently absorbed into another molecule producing a gain in electron potential (For the explanation in English, see http://greenhouse.geologist-1011.net). In this sense, we can say that both kinetic and radiative heat transfer processes contribute to the thermal conduction measured in materials, contrary to the ethereal heat transfer idea of Tyndall and Arrhenius. Even so, the process of electron potential swapping, which we can verify as occuring via radiation across a distance, cannot be ruled out when molecules "collide" or come into range of interaction. As such, without additional experimental confirmation of kinetic heat transfer (not to be confused with the thermal effects of the universal gas law), kinetic theory remains an unnecessary and unverifiable complication to the conclusions we may draw about heat transfer. However, Tyndall's conceptual underpinning in various 19th Century pseudoscience is either glibly ignored or unknown to those who claim that he proved the "Greenhouse Effect".
Tyndall's radiative emission experiments yield the inevitable aporia consequent to confusing two totally different optical properties such as opacity and absorption. While he successfully shows that carbon dioxide ("carbonic acid") is many times more opaque than zero grade air ("pure air"), Tyndall's results show that carbon dioxide exhibits, at most, only 30% more radiative emission than zero grade air does for the same amount of heat. I refer you to Tyndall (1861, p. 278, ¶. 3) where "pure" air rising over a heated spatula produces a deflection of more than 60 degrees. Compare this with results listed by Tyndall (1861, p. 279). The thermopile, when calibrated to subtract this hot air radiation, deflects meagrely a further 18 degrees as a result of radiation from carbon dioxide that was subject to a presumeably similar amount of heat applied to a copper ball, with which the rising air made contact. Rather than discuss this dramatic difference of proportion relative to air, evident between his "absorption" measurements and his emission measurements, Tyndall (1861, p. 280) goes on to argue by arithmetic analogy that his radiative emission results reflect his "absorption" results. However, he fails to recollect the sixty degree deflection due to air prior to callibrating his equipment to subtract the radiating effect of air.
Although historical authors such as Arrhenius generally acknowledge that Tyndall regarded "absorbing" gases as thermal buffers rather than warming agents, contemporary and historical authors alike (Arrhenius, 1896; Weart, 2003, p. 3) fail to acknowledge the fact that Tyndall made absolutely no measurement of actual absorption, he confused absorption and opacity, and if anything, his differential radiation idea rests heavily on the idea of luminiferous aether - later refuted by Michelson & Morley (1887).

Gerlach

I have included the full text of Gerlach's 1991 paper concerning volcanic carbon dioxide emissions because so few people who cite Gerlach's work have actually read it. This is hardly surprising, considering that until now, this paper has not been available online. Contrary to the claims of Monbiot, the USGS, and many other authors, Gerlach (1991) includes no measurement-based carbon dioxide emission estimates of any submarine volcanoes, makes no attempt at modal representation, and Gerlach's global volcanic emission estimate is based on carbon dioxide emission measurements taken from only seven subaerial volcanoes (Gerlach, 1991, §4, ¶1) and three hydrothermal vent sites (Gerlach, 1991, §3, ¶3). Yet the USGS (2010) stated that:
Scientists have calculated that volcanoes emit between about 130-230 million tonnes (145-255 million tons) of CO2 into the atmosphere every year (Gerlach, 1991). This estimate includes both subaerial and submarine volcanoes, about in equal amounts.
Dare I point out the fact that although a hydrothermal vent site might be one of many features of a submarine volcano, a hydrothermal vent site is most definitely not a submarine volcano. Notwithstanding such inconvenient details, suffice it to ask how seven subaerial volcanoes is roughly equal to three hydrothermal vent sites? This statement of the USGS (2010) may have something to do with the claim, put forward by Tony Jones, that the carbon dioxide emissions of submarine volcanoes are counted in the USGS figures:
Can I ask you a question about that, if you don't mind? Because one British journalist whom you quoted those exact figures to went back to the US geological survey after you told him about this 85 per cent figure, and asked he them to confirm their claim that actually 130 times the amount of CO2 is produced by man than volcanoes. The volcanologist Dr Terrance Gerlach confirmed that figure and said furthermore that in their counting they count the undersea volcanoes. So your response to that.
"In their counting, they count the undersea volcanoes." I wonder how this might be possible if no-one can quote the carbon dioxide emission for even one submarine volcano predating Tony Jones' statement? There are certainly no submarine volcano emission estimates listed in Gerlach (1991), which up until April, 2010, was the sole source for the USGS claim. In spite of this, George Monbiot went on to say:
Yeah, sure. I mean, it's, again, straightforward fabrication. Ian produces no new evidence to suggest that the USGS figures are wrong. He keeps citing this statement that they don't include submarine volcanoes. It's been pointed out to him many, many times that the USGS figures do include submarine volcanoes. And actually, it's the height of bad manners Professor Plimer to lie on national television about something that you know to be plain wrong.
The facts of the ABC interview suggest that George Monbiot knows all about the various and diverse altitudes of "bad manners". But more importantly, did he know the following? A measurement-based estimate of a hydrothermal vent site's carbon dioxide emission is a completely different thing to a measurement-based estimate of a submarine volcano's carbon dioxide emission. Although Gerlach (1991) does mention submarine volcanoes, there is not even one single submarine volcano's carbon dioxide emission estimate in the entire paper. The point of republishing Gerlach (1991) is so you may verify this for yourself. This paper not only confirms Plimer's (2009, p. 207) assertion that we do not measure the carbon dioxide emission of submarine volcanoes, it reveals a disturbing contrast between reality and the above-quoted statements of prominent and respected journalists such as Tony Jones and George Monbiot. Gerlach (1991), which is the putative academic source for the assertions of both Tony Jones' and George Monbiot's above-quoted statements, includes measurement-based carbon dioxide emission estimates of only seven subaerial volcanoes, three hydrothermal vent sites, and not one single solitary submarine volcano. Dare I ask if Jones or Monbiot actually bothered to check their sources? George Monbiot's attack on the character of Australia's best known geoscience professor on national television, hinges on the unavailability of Gerlach (1991) to the typical Lateline audience. This entire episode, regarding volcanic carbon dioxide emission, speaks to a conspicuous lack of caution in the assertions of those seeking to blame human beings for the cycles and seasons of climate.
Moreover, I draw your attention to Gerlach (1991, §1, ¶4) where Gerlach telegraph's his emphasis on the fact that the data available at the time was woefully inadequate to a global estimate. Although Gerlach (1991, §3, ¶3) does mention some proxy measurements for mid oceanic-ridge degassing, he also demonstrates that these are nonetheless doubtful as the degree of fractionation remains unknown (Gerlach, 1991, §3, ¶4). About persistant submarine volcanoes, Gerlach (1991, §3, ¶1) asserts "There are no estimates for off-ridge volcanos". In fact, Gerlach (1991, §6, ¶5) had sufficient foresight to caution his readers as follows:
The adequacy of seafloor spreading rates as a predictor of mid-plate volcano degassing rates is less clear, and it is possible that CO2 degassing at mid-plate volcanos is outside the conceptual framework of the current carbon cycle models. The high CO2 degassing rates for Mount Etna underscore the need to ensure that mid-plate volcano degassing is satisfactorily represented in models of the carbon geochemical cycle.
Although Gerlach's foresight may seem prophetic, the large number of active seamounts had already been documented (Batiza, 1982), and even this figure was later found to be somewhat conservative with the latest estimate of submarine volcanoes standing at more than three million (Hillier & Watts, 2007 - See http://carbon-budget.geologist-1011.net for details). Moreover, it has been known for more than seven years now that the global volcanic carbon dioxide emission figures put forward by the USGS are long out of date and quite clearly wrong, as the figures of Morner & Etiope (2002) show. Perhaps, if not for Monbiot's campaign of interruption, Professor Plimer might have been afforded the opportunity to cite sources such as Morner & Etiope (2002) and explain the empirical limitations of Gerlach's study. The text of Gerlach (1991) would suggest that Monsieur Monbiot's fraud allegations against Plimer, regarding the content and basis of Gerlach (1991), are specious and without foundation. Moreover, I challenge anyone taken in by those specious allegations to name so much as a single submarine seamount CO2 emission measurement in any of the peer-reviewed literature to date.

Sources

Burgess, E., 1837, "General Remarks on the Temperature of the Terrestrial Globe and the Planetary Spaces; by Baron Fourier.", American Journal of Science, Vol 32, pp. 1-20. Translation from the French, of Fourier, J. B. J., 1824, "Remarques Générales Sur Les Températures Du Globe Terrestre Et Des Espaces Planétaires.", Annales de Chimie et de Physique, Vol. 27, pp. 136–167.
Fourier, J. B. J., 1824, "Remarques Générales Sur Les Températures Du Globe Terrestre Et Des Espaces Planétaires.", Annales de Chimie et de Physique, Vol. 27, pp. 136–167.
Fourier, J. B. J., 1827, "MEMOIRE sur les temperatures du globe terrestre et des espaces planetaires", Memoires de l'Acadeémie Royale des Sciences, Vol. 7, pp. 569-604, source: http://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k32227.image.f808.tableDesMatieres.langEN.
Gerlach, T. M., 1991, "Present-Day CO2 Emissions from Volcanoes", EOS, Transactions, American Geophysical Union, Vol. 72, pp. 249, 254-255.
Tyndall J., 1861, "On the Absorption and Radiation of Heat by Gases and Vapours, and on the Physical Connexion of Radiation, Absorption, Conduction.-The Bakerian Lecture.", The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science, Series 4, Vol. 22, pp. 169-194, 273-285.

Bibliography

Abbot, C. G., 1909, “Note on the Theory of the Greenhouse”, The London, Edinburgh and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science, Series 6, Vol.18, pp. 32-35.
Archer, D., 2009, The Long Thaw, ISBN13: 978-0-9611-3654-7
Arnold, M., 1867, Celtic Literature, London.
Boltzmann, L., 1884, "Ableitung des Stefan'schen Gesetzes, betreffend die Abhängigkeit der Wärmestrahlung von der Temperatur aus der electromagnetischen Lichttheorie", Annalen der Physik und Chemie, Vol. 22, pp. 291-294
De Saussure, H-B., 1779, Voyages dans les Alpes, Précédés d'un Essai sur l'Histoire Naturalle des Environs de Geneve, Libraire du Roi.
Farag, I. H., 1976, "Radiative Heat Transmission from non-Luminous Gases. Computational Study of the Emissivities of Water Vapor and Carbon Dioxide"Doctoral Thesis Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Farag, I. H., and Allam, T. A., 1981, "Gray-Gas Approximation of Carbon Dioxide Standard Emissivity", Jounal of Heat Transfer, Vol. 103, pp. 403–405.
Flannery, T. 2005, The Weather Makers, ISBN13: 978-1-9208-8584-7
Fleming, J. R., 1999, "Joseph Fourier, the ‘greenhouse effect’, and the quest for a universal theory of terrestrial temperatures", Endeavour, Vol. 23, pp. 72-75
Gerlich, G., & Tscheuschner, R. D., 2007, "Falsification Of The Atmospheric CO2 Greenhouse Effects Within The Frame Of Physics", arXiv:0707.1161v1 [physics.ao-ph].
Gerlich, G., & Tscheuschner, R. D., 2009, "Falsification Of The Atmospheric CO2 Greenhouse Effects Within The Frame Of Physics", International Journal of Modern Physics, Vol. B23, pp.275-364, arXiv:0707.1161v4 [physics.ao-ph], DOI: 10.1142/S021797920904984X
Hottel, H. C., 1954, Heat Transmission, 3rd Edn, McGraw Hill, New York
Hillier, J. K., & Watts, A. B., 2007, "Global distribution of seamounts from ship- track bathymetry data", Geophysical. Research. Letters, Vol. 34, L13304, doi:10.1029/2007GL029874
Lallemant, N., Sayret, A., & Weber, R., 1996, "Evaluation OF Emissivity Correlations for H20-C02-N2/Air Mixtures and Coupling with Solution Methods of the Radiative Transfer Equation", Progress in Energy & Combustion Science, Vol. 22, pp. 543-574
Leckner, B., 1972, "Spectral and Total Emissivity of Water Vapor and Carbon Dioxide", Combustion & Flame, Vol. 19, pp. 33–48
Luciani, L., 2013, "Borrowed, Not Fabricated: The Valley of 'Gesufa' in the Sicilian Prayer 'U Vebbu'", Folklore, in press, DOI:10.1080/0015587X.2013.812416
Michelson, A. A., & Morley, E. W., 1887, "The Relative Motion of the Earth and the Luminiferous Aether", American Journal of Science, Vol. 34, p. 333
Morner N. A., Etiope, G, 2002, "Carbon degassing from the lithosphere", Global and Planetary Change, Vol. 33, pp. 185-203
Plimer, I. R., 2009, Heaven and Earth: Global Warming, the Missing Science, 503 pp., ISBN13: 978-1-9214-2114-3
Rubens, H., & Ladenburg, E., 1905, "Uber das Langwellige Absorptions-Spektrum der Kohlensaure", Verhandlungen der Deutschen Physikalischen Gesellschaft Vol. 7, p. 170
USGS (United States Geological Survey), 2010, "Volcanic gases and their effects.", Retrieved ISO:2010-May-19 from USGS Web site: http://volcanoes.usgs.gov/hazards/gas/index.php, Rev. ISO:2010-Apr-30-14:36:55 UTC
Weart, S. R., 2003, The Discovery of Global Warming, ISBN10:0-6740-1157-0.

Not So Apologetic!

Not So Apologetic!

Not So Apologetic!

Welcome to the apologetics part of my site where I discuss some of my own opinions concerning scientific issues of interest to the public. This site is focussed on using empiricism to stay informed because an uninformed choice is meagrely the illusion of choice. This is how any form of propaganda constitutes a clear and present danger to individual liberty and subverts democracy. Although democracy may often depend on science for the informedness of choice, science is empirical and neither democratic nor authoritarian. Material evidence is the only arbiter of science, and whatsoever does not defer to material evidence is not science. Thus interpretation, by its arbitrary nature, is unscientific - and the claim that interpretation is part of the scientific process denies the empirical nature of science. A hypothesis meagrely extends beyond the known facts a question of what might yet be discovered. Moreover, if scientific, it will specify the physical observation of material phenomena that will resolve the hypothetical question. This is the furtherest an idea may venture from the evidence, and remain scientific. Anything more is pseudoscience.
A common theme running through most of the topics covered at http://geologist-1011.net it that of catastrophism. It would seem that in most examples of pseudo-science, a catastrophe is invoked for the purpose of escaping scrutiny. More than being a powerful motivator, fear is a potent decoy and in this sense a powerful method of hiding contradictory evidence and the faults in the logic. Some notable exceptions to the usual examples of catastrophic pseudo-theory, are the expanding earth theory and the the idea that the next magnetic reversal will end computerised civilisation as we know it. The Expanding Earth Theory was originally invoked to challenge the Plate Tectonics hypotheses at a time when it lacked evidence of subduction. The idea that a magnetic reversal may end computerised civilisation as we know it, is quite possibly wishful thinking on the part of its proponents.
A surprising amount of modern pseudoscience is coming out of the environmental sector. Perhaps it should not be so surprising given that environmentalism is political rather than scientific. However, time and again, we hear the argument that we must act before the science is researched just in case the hypothesis is correct and catastrophe is about to strike. Often enough, the research concerning many of the claims has already been done, and shows that such imaginary catastrophes are little more than sensationalised science fiction. Yet, whenever such objections are brought to bear, the evidence is deftly sidestepped by attacks on the person's character or dubious claims that experts know more. Such ad homenim arguments are inherently dishonest because, by its very design, ad homenim sidesteps and censors the facts by focussing the argument on the person. The only reason to avoid discussing the facts in debate is if the facts are clearly inconvenient. In the case of the so-called "environmentalists", this ultimately leads to the denial of a great many verifiable facts. Such denials occur so often in field of geology that I think the term geology denier is most apt. Assertions of the geology deniers include the claims that:
  • Temperatures of the twentieth centrury are unprecedented
    [contrary to the Phanerozoic record]
  • Carbon dioxide levels of the twentieth century are unprecedented
    [contrary to the Phanerozoic record]
  • Carbon dioxide inhibits plant growth
    [numerous studies show otherwise]
  • Global warming causes mass extinctions
    [which actually correlate with cooling]
  • Global warming causes desertification
    [so why is aridity a feature of ice ages instead?]
  • Tuvalu's putative inundation is due to rising sea levels
    [as opposed to volcanic subsidence]
  • Kilimanjaro's ice is melting due to global warming
    [as opposed to ablation due to regional deforestation]
  • Fourier fathered the greenhouse effect, likening the atmosphere to the glass of a greenhouse
    [when Fourier actually argued the contrary]
  • Tyndall measured thermal absorption in gases, thereby proving the "Greenhouse Effect"
    [when Tyndall actually measured opacity]
  • The "Greenhouse Effect" is a valid concept of Physics wih experimental confirmation
    [so why is it missing from physics textbooks?]
  • The atmospheric impact of volcanic carbon dioxide can be isotopically distinguished from fossil fuel carbon dioxide
    [when we don't even have a statistically significant average volcanic carbon isotope ratio]
  • Estimates of volcanic contributions to atmospheric carbon dioxide include measurements of submarine volcano emissions
    [when the source literature explicitly admits a lack of such measurements]
  • There are no natural CFCs
    [when volcanic and biological CFC production is well documented]
In all cases, the above statements (in italics) are obvious fictions that even a superficial review of the scientific literature can overturn. Yet they continue to be propagated by self proclaimed "environmentalists" despite the fact that they have long been refuted by scientific research. The articles presented here on this site review the science that refutes these claims, but this is only the tip of the iceberg, and one must ask how competant scientists could possibly dream up such obvious fiction. The modern "environmentally" motivated "science" of anthropogenic global warming is either based on incompetance and charlatanism or lies and dishonesty. I will endeavour to leave the interpretation to you. However, suffice it to say that such a pitiful excuse for science as we see in modern "environmentalism" compells us to ask for the material evidence every single time an assertion is claimed to be scientific. We may yet ponder how a single lobby outperforms and outclasses all other pseudosciences put together for sheer diversity and volume of brazen disinformation. Yet the most profound consequence of subverting empirical science with political propaganda is the denial of scientific fact, and the deprecation of the very empiricism of scientific endeavour, without which technological progress is impossible.

How Deforestation Represents the Largest Anthropogenic CO2 Contribution

This article is a product of my investigation into the media hysteria surrounding global warming. Here, I show how deforestation dwarfs all other anthropogenic contributions to atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations combined. This raises questions as to why we have a single-minded media obsession with fossil fuel combustion to the exclusion of what is by far, the biggest anthropogenic contribution to atmospheric carbon dioxide levels? Let's face it, the Amazon basin is now becoming far more accessible to seismic trucks and land drilling rigs than ever before as a direct result of deforestation.

Climate Change Catastrophism: Intellectual Fascism for Science Pretenders.

As a petroleum geologist specialising in sedimentology, I've a a keen fascination with past environments, and palaeoclimate as indicated by aspects of the geological record is a substantial part of that fascination. It was with considerable interest that I observed the debate over global warming as it evolved. Initially, I thought I'd be fortunate enough to witness the first ever scientific assimilation of compound recursive analysis in the pursuit of understanding complex feedback systems such as climate and climate change mechanisms. I was to be bitterly disappointed. Like their Nineteenth Century counterparts, modern Catastrophists are all too keen to ignore the lessons of history. Moreover, the sheer number of factual errors that continue to be propagated in spite of widely known corrections from the scientific community is astounding. In this article, I explore the media claims of doom and gloom in light of the scientific evidence.

"Greenhouse Effect": a Legacy of Misunderstanding, Misattribution, Error, Obfuscation and Fake Science.

A cornerstone of modern climatology is the "Greenhouse Effect", which was defined by Svante Arrhenius more than a century ago as the transformation of light into heat and subsequent entrapment of that heat by a thermally impervious bounding medium, such as the atmosphere. This proved to be an obfuscation of a radiation recycling mechanism in which backradiation was claimed to cause surface warming. Arrhenius clung to the aether hypothesis well into the twentieth century. Arrhenius' belief in aether lead him to confuse conductive and kinetic heat transfer, via Tyndall's theory of aethereal heat propagation. This lent itself to his duplication of the radiative component of conductive heat transfer. Arrhenius attempted to justify this obvious energy creation mechanism by arguing that selective obstruction of outgoing radiation raises temperature. However, this argument, based on Tyndall's confusion of opacity and absorption, neglects the fact that inasmuch as absorption increases heat, emission looses an equal amount of heat - a fact even Tyndall recognised. Nevertheless, Arrhenius stood fast in the face of emerging quantum mechanics that offered a much better explanation of heat transfer. Compatible, rather than conflicting, with the respective applications of Fourier's Law and Boltzmann's Law, this new understanding provided a subatomic model that could show how both kinetic and radiative transfer modes coexist as vectors of thermal conduction. This dictates that thermal conductivity, not absorptivity, governs thermal gradients between materials in thermal contact (such as the surface of the earth and the atmosphere). However, the respective thermal conductivities of air and carbon dioxide do not support any measureable effect on mean surface temperature sufficient to be empirically attributed to carbon dioxide. Moreover, the Stefan Boltzmann Law not only confirms the optimum temperature of a greenhouse, but shows how the "Greenhouse Effect" fell prey to the Wood Experiment by quantifying exactly how much of a temperature difference would be made under the conditions of the experiment, if Arrhenius' "backradiation" really did play a role distinct from that of thermal conduction. By correctly calculating the mean temperature of the earth's absorbing mass, using only the Stefan-Boltzmann Law, we can show that the "Greenhouse Effect" is an entirely unnecessary complication to a satisfactory explanation of climate by Stefan-Boltzmann's Law and Fourier's Law. The "Greenhouse Effect" thus shattered, leaves no rational reason to assert that global warming is anthropogenic.

Volcanic CO2: The Hole in the Carbon Budget.

Volcanogenic sources of CO2 quite possibly outpace human industry; producing, by extrapolation, 24 GtCpa, which is easily three times the industrial emission of CO2. Given the existence of more than three million submarine volcanoes, this comes as no surprise especially considering the fact that carbon dioxide is the second most erupted gas on the planet, next to water vapour. Such extrapolations are meagre guesswork in the face of the immense number of unmonitored volcanic emissions throughout the world. Due to the collossal lack of necessary data, the best empirical work can, so far, only address minimum volcanic emission. To date, there is no viable empirical method by which we may establish a maximum limit to volcanic emission. Moreover, there is no magic fingerprint to identify industrial CO2 because volcanic CO2 lacks sufficient isotopic measurement to be isotopically distinguishable from fossil fuel CO2. This renders the Suess Effect inapplicable and the diversity of natural oxidation renders the molar ratio of O2 consumed to CO2 produced irrelevant. Moreover, the geographic distribution of recent volcanic activity also explains the more intense Polar Spring melts this decade. It is not unreasonable to hypothesise that the balance between photosynthesis and emission of volcanic carbon dioxide may play the dominant part in determining atmospheric CO2 levels.

Volcanic CFCs: A Matter of Denial.

It is widely accepted that CFCs (chlorofluorocarbons) are not volcanic, CFCs are not naturally occuring, and that CFCs are not natural in any way. This popular perception has lead to endeavours as serious as the underpinning of methodology and accusations of error. Yet as it turns out, experimental data and direct scientific measurement have shown on many occasions that CFCs and other halocarbons are not only of human origin but halocarbons and CFCs are naturally occuring as well. Such unfounded and false assumptions raise serious questions about the science behind the Montreal Protocol

The Expanding Earth Alternative to Plate Tectonics Theory

Plate Tectonics is a grand unifying theory setting the framework in which geological activity occurs and defining the specific geological setting from which we may accurately make broad predictions about volcanic geochemistry and behaviour. According to plate tectonics, the crust of the earth is made up of a number of mobile plates, floating on a relatively fluid mantle. These plates are pushed out and away from rift zones where new crust is extruded, and according to plate tectonics, where plates collide, the denser plate generally is forced beneath the lighter plate in a process called subduction. Mountains typically occur along convergent plate boundaries. This plate motion was believed to be caused by mantle convection whereby heat from the earth's core is transferred to the earth's surface. In the formative years of plate tectonics, Professor Carey identified a key weakness in the idea. At the time, there was little if any evidence of subduction occurring as a modern process and Carey suggested that an equally viable idea was that the earth was expanding. Although Carey's mechanisms of earth expansion were equally ephemeral to that of mantle convection, scientific evidence for both convective and subductive processes has since emerged in the results of cosmogenic isotope studies and direct GPS measurement of subduction rates.

Magnetic Reversals: Prognosis for the Biological and Technological Impacts

Several times every million years, the magnetic poles swap places. We know this from the alternation of magnetic particles in strata and bands of rifting crust. Although some have made dire predictions about the biological effect of magnetic reversals, mass extinctions are not correlated with this phenomena. Professor Ian R. Plimer has suggested the possibility that a future magnetic reversal may lead to the end of technology as we know it. However, by calculating the flux from the most rapid magnetic reversal in the geological record and comparing this with more common magnetic phenomena such as solar storms, we can determine that a magnetic reversal poses no risk to computers and electronic equipment.

Matters Beyond Faith: What is Science Anyway?

Science is not the monopoly of the "intelligentsia". We all conduct scientific experiments every day. Science is repeatable, independently verifiable, and as Professor Ian R. Plimer is so fond of saying, science is wed to evidence. What is so hard about that? Yet we have an army of journalists and organisations obsessed with "scientific consensus", a veritable "non-turbulent turbidite" that can only be described as an oxymoron. In fact I'd go as far as saying that the inference that consensus is relevant at all to science is fraudulent in the extreme because it redefines the last standing evidence-based discipline as a meagre political philosophy.

Some Beliefs and Opinions of a Geoscientist

The existence of an all powerful God is a matter of belief which, ironically depends on you. I believe in the human conscience, and recognise no higher authority than that sense of empathy; commonly expressed as the idea that "God is love". See? I do believe in God, I just don't believe in the Assyrian storm god, King Henry VIII, or for that matter the Prime Minister! My politics are centred on equitable individualism; that idea that the only legitimate function of society is equitable safeguarding of individual life and expression; to safeguard such rights & expression as does not relatively disadvantage any individual or group.

The Most Misquoted & Misrepresented Science Papers in the Public Domain A number of authors, including Fourier, Tyndall, and Gerlach are chronically misrepresented and misquoted in pseudoscientific and pseudo-academic literature. If you read Fourier's articles for yourself, you will discover that Fourier had more to do with the urban heat island effect and the first and second laws of thermodynamics than any stretch of Arrhenius' "Greenhouse Effect". If you read Tyndall's work, you will discover that Tyndall did not conceive of the difference between opacity and absorption. Moreover, Tyndall's differential transmission theory, the precursor to the "Greenhouse Effect", was heavily underpinned by Tyndall's aethereal heat transfer idea, which misrepresents the role of radiative transfer in the conduction of heat through a material. If you read Gerlach's 1991 paper for yourself, you will discover that this paper includes no volcanic carbon dioxide emission estimates for submarine volcanoes, contrary to the popular claims espoused by Tony Jones, George Monbiot and the USGS.

Climate Change Catastrophes in Critical Thinking

Climate Change Catastrophes in Critical Thinking

Climate Change Catastrophes in Critical Thinking

This is to be a work in progress. As I collect more interesting evidence, I'll be sure to add it.

Abstract

This article explores the phenomenon of global warming, climate change, and the extraordinary consequences popularly speculated. As a hypothesis can only be scientific if it is testable, this article tests key assertions of climate change Catastrophism against the facts of the geological record. Finding that, climate change Catastrophism lacks scientific support, the implications of neo-catastrophist behaviour with special regard to global warming is considered and in this light, the proposed remedies for global warming are examined against contemporary crises and opportunities. This article finds that the impact of excessive land clearance is of far greater concern.

What is Global Warming?

Global warming is a generalisation in both space and time used to describe the rising trend in mean global temperature evident in many but not all analyses of near-surface temperature data. Temperature is measured instrumentally at weather stations located mostly in and around cities, towns and villages; and by infrared imaging of the lower Troposphere obtained by satellite. The Troposphere is the lowest layer of atmosphere making lower Tropospheric mean temperatures much more representative of global mean temperature than the average of measurements taken in mostly built up areas that are ultimately exaggerated by building heat during Winter, air-conditioner venting during Summer, and radiant heat from bitumen and concrete, etc. It is noteworthy that those promoting the global warming panic still use the soundly discredited instrumental temperature charts instead of the less convenient satellite data.
Climate change, and in particular the subject of global warming, has become a hotly debated subject in recent years. Much of the debate seems to be focussed on speculative projections arising from an emphasis of the soundly discredited instrumental temperature averages of contemporary history to the exclusion of better quality satellite data along with what is known about temperature trends throughout human history and indeed prehistory.
According to those alarmed at the prospect of a warmer planet Earth, global warming poses one of the greatest threats humanity have faced in our rather short history. It is often asserted that global warming is caused by rising carbon dioxide levels and that it will ultimately cause the expansion of deserts and arid regions, a substantial rise in mean sea level, and the mass extinction of much of the life on planet Earth. If such catastrophes were indeed the product of global warming, they would have occurred as consequences of past global warming events. The geological record with numerous indicators of temperature, climate, sea level, carbon dioxide levels, and biodiversity; can be used to test the speculation that global warming would indeed be catastrophic.


What Can History & the Geological Record Tell Us About Global Warming?

How Reliable is Geological History in Modelling Global Warming?

Claims of global warming catastrophe are speculations made on the basis of limited combinations of physical processes. The applicability of such combinations cannot be proven on their own merit, because without some form of empirical testing we cannot verify that they are completely representative of all processes relevant to global climate change. Without a repeatable test against which to measure such claims, they cannot correctly be described as scientific hypotheses. Geological history is ignored by those raising the alarm about global warming and I have heard it argued that the geological record is irrelevant because it is "in the past and things are really different now". However, the very uniqueness claimed of those current conditions identified as affecting the climate can also be tested against the geological record. Moreover, cyclicity is well documented in both history (eg. Tuchman, 1987) and geology (eg. Miall, 1997), so it stands to reason that the past can offer a valuable testbed for climate speculation.

Palaeotemperature

Temperature in the geological record, is determined by oxygen isotope ratios measured from the analysis of remains of floating marine organisms and calibrated against the correlation of oxygen isotope ratios measured in modern floating marine organism remains against temperature means measured in human history (eg. Veizer et al., 2000).  Another very accurate indicator of temperature is the extent of specific sediment types such as tillites, moraine deposits, and drop-stones, indicative of glacial activity at latitudes specific to the plate tectonic reconstruction of the period of geological history in question (Scotese, 2001; Royer et al., 2004). Recent pH corrections to the oxygen isotope palaeotemperature record made by Royer et al. (2004) have improved palaeotemperature correlation with both cosmic radiation cycles and temperature constraints imposed by the varying distribution of glacial sediment. In this sense we have a very accurate picture of some of the patterns and variations of temperature throughout geological history.

Palaeobathymetry

Taking variations of mean sea level into account has proven vital to accurate basin analysis. Basin analysis is used to identify the historical path of source and reservoir rocks relative to the oil window. This is used to determine whether potential reservoirs may have been buried too deeply or alternatively if potential source rocks have been buried deeply enough to produce the targeted hydrocarbons. Miall (1997) devotes an entire section to the subject of non-seismic methods for reconstructing a palaeobathymetric record. While seismic methods used stratigraphic features such as onlap to indicate relative sea level through time, other methods include sediment thickness plots, the Fischer plot based on cycle number, and the R3 plot based on decompacted sediment thicknesses. While precise correlation between methods is not observed, the accuracy of correlation is surprising. If palaeobathymetry is accurate enough for profitable stratigraphic analysis in petroleum exploration, then the global plots are accurate enough to test the assertion that global warming causes sea level rises.

Palaeoclimate

Sedimentology is a study of sedimentation that compares modern sediments with sediments observed in the geological record in order to identify depositional environments. Implicit in the nature and extent of depositional environments is the controlling palaeoclimate. Pelletal clays, evapourites, desiccation cracks, synaeresis cracks, and wind borne sediments such as sand dunes, loess, and parna are all indicators of arid conditions which are confirmed by the presence of clasts with etched or pitted surfaces, silcrete, and dreikanters (wind-faceted pebbles). Tillite, moraine, drop-stones, and striated erosion surfaces found on outcrop, boulders and drop-stones are all produced by glaciers. Coals are typically preserved in wet and humid environments. "Polystrate" trees (trees preserved as coal and clastic sediment accumulates around them) and varves (seasonal sedimentation) are features of lacustrine or lake sedimentation. Other environments clearly indicated by sediment types, sequences and stratigraphic sequence include deltas, estuaries, submarine canyons, braided river systems, meandering river systems, coral reefs, abyssal plains, coasts, etc. Sediment features such as bed thickness, symmetrical ripples, asymmetric ripples, megaripples, crossbedding, trough width, and grain size indicate the relative volume, speed and power of transport mechanisms such as river systems, which in turn are governed by the amount of precipitation available to the fluvial (river) system (Miall, 1996).

Biodiversity

The fossil record is well established, with faunal progression so well documented that in some parts of the fossil record, transitional forms are too numerous to determine a precise time of speciation. Although the global distribution and extent of environments favouring fossilisation varies with time, there is a well defined alternation of mass extinction and biological radiation.

Carbon Dioxide Levels Throughout Geological History

Past carbon dioxide levels are measured from the contents of vesicles and cavities that were once exposed to the atmosphere - such as those found in ice cores. Another method used to determine older carbon dioxide levels is the use of a series of carbon dioxide steady states to calibrate the weathering of silicates with carbon dioxide levels.

Is Global Warming Really Catastrophic?

To answer the question of whether global warming really is catastrophic, it is logical to fall back on science rather than politics or economics. Science has nothing to do with consensus nor with qualification. Science is entirely based on hard evidence, falsifiable hypotheses, and repeatable tests. Consider; the world was still an oblate spheroid back in the times when by almost unanimous human consensus, the world was believed to be flat and have edges guarded by terrible beasts. A lack of approval of your peers and a lack of qualifications cannot possibly prevent you from testing scientific theories such as gravity. In fact, you conduct a scientific experiment every time you cross the road when you check to ensure no traffic is approaching before stepping off the curb. You can also test the claims that global warming has catastrophic consequences because having established that the geological record provides an excellent test bed for these claims, we can now test them as hypotheses against the geological record. This, is the nature of science. Let us therefore scientifically test each of the hypotheses that global warming does indeed have catastrophic consequences.
To this end, I've compiled a comparative record of cosmic radiation, mean global temperature, atmospheric carbon dioxide, atmospheric oxygen, extinction rates, and variations in mean sea level:
Phanerozoic climate diagram with temperature after Scotese (2001) correlated with biodiversity (above) 
but not with carbon dioxide after Berner (2001)
Cosmic Radiation in gold, Carbon Dioxide in bold violet, & Temperature in red after Royer et al. (2004), Geocarb III Carbon dioxide hypothetical computer model in fine violet after Berner (2001), Oxygen in green after Berner et al.  (2003), Extinction Rates in brown after Futuyma (1998), & Seismic Mean Sea Level Variations after Exxon in blue, & Qualitative Mean Sea Level Variations in teal after Hallam et al. (1989). Radiometric dates in black grid of 50 million year increments with epochs in alternating grey and white. Glacial periods are overprinted in solid cyan. Note the greater correlation between cosmic radiation and temperature than between carbon dioxide and temperature. Note also the sudden rise in extinction rates every time global mean temperature falls below 19 degrees Celcius. The only extinction event to occur above 19 degrees Celcius occurs in response to a sudden drop in oxygen levels. Up until the break-up of Gondwana, oxygen and temperature have a roughly inverse correlation. Relative sea level sometimes correlates directly, sometimes inversely, and at other times indefinitely which, is to say that mean sea level and temperature do not correlate throughout geological history.

"Global Warming is Unprecedented"
Is it really?

If global warming is indeed in some way unprecedented, then we would expect to find no match for the current global warming trend in the geological record. Let us consider just the most recent Holocene epoch - dominated by human history.
graph of climate data over the past 11000 years depicting two major Holocene Optimums 
(warm periods), the Minoan Climate Optimum, the Roman Climate Optimum, the Medieval Warm Period, 
and the less significant current warm period.
Average near-surface temperatures of the northern hemisphere during the past 11,000 years compiled by David Archibald after Dansgaard et al. (1969) & Schönwiese (1995).
Looking at just the historical picture, shown in the graph above, we can see that global warming has happened many times before in human history. We've had the Minoan Warm Period, the Roman Climate Optimum, and the Medieval Warm Period in addition to the current warm period (Dansguard et al., 1968; Schönwiese, 1995; Keigwin, 1996). Note the steepness of the rise in temperature at the beginning of the Minoan warm period. This rate of warming far exceeds that of the current warm period. Huang et al. (1997) determined that the depiction of the Medieval Warm Period in this graph may be somewhat conservative. According to their study of 6000 boreholes worldwide, the global mean temperatures of the Medieval Warm Period dwarf the changes of the Twentieth Century.
The evidence shows repeatedly that global warming is not unprecedented and according to Ruddiman (2001) as well as Singer & Avery (2006), global warming is a regular cyclic phenomenon on planet Earth. In fact, the normal global mean temperature for planet earth given the Phanerozoic history, is actually 19.5 degrees Celcius; a full three degrees higher than the present mean.

"Global Warming Will Lead to a Catastrophic Rise in Sea Levels"
Is that so?

Neither the Hallam sea level curve, nor the Exxon sea level curve correlates reliably with variations in temperature throughout the Phanerozoic. However, the response of sea level to temperature does appear to increase as continental landmass becomes less clustered. For example, during the late Ordovician glaciation, sea levels fell only slightly in comparison to later glacial periods such as the last ice age. What is interesting is the persistent rise and fall of mean sea level during glaciation. While mean sea level appears to follow the major trends in temperature throughout a number of epochs across the Phanerozoic, Jurassic and Triassic mean sea levels are lowest when the temperature is highest. In spite of common direct correlations, the almost equally common inverse correlations between temperature and sea level suggests that something other than global mean temperature controls sea level.
Planet Earth's crust or lithosphere, is a skin made up of independent plates that float on the liquid aesthenosphere. As such, the lithosphere can be buoyed up where it is lighter and sag where it is heavier. Isostatic reaction describes the process known as, "unloading", where there is a tectonic rebound of continental plates that are are stripped of a mass of either rock (by erosion) or ice (by melting), combined with increased mass in ocean basins (Watts, 2001). This has been used to explain why in many cases sea level is documented as having risen in response to cooling and fallen in response to warming (Lisitzin, 1974).
For example, sea levels actually fell during the steady rise in temperature prior to the temperature maximum at the end of the middle Ordovician. This dwarfed the minor rise and fall of sea level during the late Ordovician glaciation. For the larger part, sea levels were very low during the Carboniferous-Permian Glaciation, but the fluctuations of the period saw minor rises in sea level in response to minor cooling and minor falls in sea level in response to minor warming. Of greater significance is the minor response in sea level at the same time as the major temperature peak in the Triassic that is followed by a large scale rise in sea level as temperatures fall drastically into the Jurassic period. This inverse correlation stops at the break-up of Gondwana, and sea levels have appeared to follow temperature more accurately since the beginning of the Cretaceous about 140 million years ago. These anomalies in the relationship between sea level and global mean temperature are confirmed by independent studies utilising different methods (Hallam et al., 1989). As it turns out, anomalous response of sea level to temperature continues until Gondwana moves away from the South Pole and begins to break up.
Modern studies of sea level including both those using sparsely distributed tide gauges and those using satellite altimeter logs have shown the global mean sea level is also influenced by the seasons (Chen et al., 1998), el Nino (Chambers et al., 2001), and volcanic eruptions (Church et al., 2005). Modern satellite measurements of sea level confirm this complexity of sea level response, showing for example a 30mm per annum rise in the eastern Indian and western Pacific oceans against a simultaneous 10mm per annum fall in the western Indian Ocean with a global average sea level rise of 4mm per year over the years 1993-2001 (Church et al., 2006).
The geological evidence shows that mean sea level is more likely to rise in response to global warming if there is sufficient continental dissemination away from the poles and that the tendency for isostatic sea level reaction (inverse correlation with temperature) is heightened by increased rifting, which generalisation corresponds to modern observations of minor global sea level fluctuations (eg. Church et al., 2006; Douglas, 1997). Although Cainozoic sea level and temperature responses do correlate, this correlation is tenuous at best in view of geological history, and an understanding the other mechanisms that cause mean sea level variations would lend itself to more reliable statements about the impact of global warming on mean sea level. The impact of such mechanisms as el Nino and decadal mechanisms such as volcanism raise questions about studies of limited duration, such as the 1993-2001 satellite record used by Church et al. (2006), and suggest that global sea level trends can only be determined from data sets spanning at least a century. Tide gauge data has supported the suggestion that global mean sea level has risen 200mm over the last century along a non-geometric trend (Douglas, 1997). However geologically stable the setting of a tide gauge, no ocean is independent of isostatic response and therefore global mean sea level can only be be determined reliably from truly global data such as satellite altimeter logs, taken over at least a century of measurement. While we are beginning to understand the numerous mechanisms that effect sea level, we have insufficient empirical evidence to draw any conclusion about the current global mean sea level trends independent of decadal, annual, and monthly processes.
Nevertheless, in the event sea levels do rise in response to a relative increase in mean global temperature, it is well worth asking whether the land area made available by retreating ice will exceed the land area flooded by rising sea levels.

"Global Warming Will Cause Widespread Desertification"
Is This Really True?

In the geological record, we see associated with cooling, aridity indicators such as thinner, finer fluvial and lacustrine sediments (Reading, 1996); & increased sedimentary evapourites, evapourite casts, and evapourite moulds (Boucot et al., 2004). Evidently, as the earth cools the growth of ice caps removes water from the atmosphere leaving less water for precipitation. In fact, the association of desertification with the Permian Ice Age is so well accepted that it is even reported by the Penguin Encyclopaedia as the only other key feature of the Permian apart from glaciation. The Willandra Lakes in New South Wales actually dried up as deserts in Australia expanded during the last ice age (Bowler, 1971; Bowler 1975; Wasson & Bowler, 1984). White (1994) connects the post-settlement aridification of Australia with deforestation rather than climate change.
In more recent history, the 1973 drought that advanced the Sahara in Sahel (Press & Seiver, 1982) occurred just after the lowest point in the 1945-1975 temperature slump depicted by the IPCC's instrumental temperature record. According to the IPCC's instrumental temperature record, the period 1913-1945 was 0.2ºC cooler than the period 1945-1974. According to the research of Pittock (1975), southeastern Australia enjoyed an increase in rainfall of between 10-20% during the warmer 1945-1974 period. The most recent drought in Australia began during a mild temperature minimum in 2003 that was compounded by a much more severe temperature minimum in late 2004 based on satellite measurements of Tropospheric mean temperature.
Throughout history, we may postulate that warm ages allowed sufficient agriculture to support large armies capable of defending the extensive borders of enormous empires including the Greeks, the Romans, and the Moors. Cooling coincided with the erosion and collapse of large empires. Presumably because agriculture under such conditions could no longer support the standing armies necessary to extensive border defence.
The thickening and coarsening fluviatile deposits of the Kevington Creek Beds in Victoria (Marsden, 1988) correspond to a Devonian temperature maximum around 400 million years ago before thinning upwards with cooling, into the Early Carboniferous fluviatile deposits of the Mansfield Group on it's basal pebbly sandstone. Although a transition from meandering river and flood plain deposits to sediments successively more typical of braided river and outwash systems confirms the tectonic uplift (Tabberabberan Orogeny) of Webby (1972), the thickness trends of the beds is most certainly indicative of varying flow rates that are ultimately dependent on the amount of precipitation in the region. A similar situation is documented in the Lake Frome Group (Wopfner, 1969; Gravestock & Cowley, 1995) of the Northern Flinders Ranges in South Australia. Here, very fine Cambrian fluviatile sediments from the Balcoracana Formation thicken into the fine fluviatile sediments of the Pantapinna Sandstone and thence into the much thicker braided river sediments of the Grindstone Range Formation. Once again, tectonic uplift of the source is indicated, but for sediment loads to increase, there must also be a corresponding increase in river flow and scale and the Grindstone Range Sandstone is on such a large scale that in addition to relatively large trough structures, it also exhibits asymmetric bifurcating ripples (eg. the photograph on this site's home page (http://www.geologist-1011.com), that are typical of shorelines attached to large bodies of water. In this case, the transition from very thin redbeds frequently punctuated by surfaces with mud (desiccation) cracks and evapourite moulds to large scale braided river systems on outwash plains coincide with a Cambrian global warming event. The Permian to Triassic in the Cooper Basin (South Australia & Queensland) displays a transition from terrestrial and subaqueous glaciogenic sediments through fluviodeltaic and lacustrine sedimentation in the Gidgealpa Group to the fluviolacustrine sediments of the Arrabury Formation with mudstones and carbonaceous mudstones of the Callamurra Member passing up into the sandstones of the Paning Member (Hill & Gravestock, 1995). This transition occurs with a steady increase in the proportion of fluviatile sedimentation with time indicating a steady increase in available precipitation during a period that coincides with the build-up to the Triassic temperature maximum.
While there are exceptions to the generalisation supported by these examples because there are nearly always arid regions somewhere on planet earth, it has been found in a number of extensive palaeogeographic studies (eg. Boucot et al., 2004; Scotese, 2001) that deserts advance in response to cooling and retreat in response to warming. On a smaller scale, the desert wet season is always in the high summer at the hottest time of the year, and the increased road maintenance expenses associated with the use of waterlogged roads is why some petroleum companies minimise their operations over high Summer. In my experience as a  petroleum geologist, the driest time of the desert year is mid-Winter. This is explained by the same research that recently proved the "Iris Effect" (Spencer et al., 2007) by showing that as temperatures rise, water vapour accumulates in the atmosphere until it is precipitated coincident with the cooling part of the cycle. If however, this vapour laden air finds it's way over a desert, rain will fall with temperatures and the Sun. Ultimately, it is only the warmest part of the year that evaporates enough water to bring the desert rains.
Wendtz et al. (2007) found that satellite measurements confirmed an increase of 7% in atmospheric water vapour per degree Celcius increase in global mean temperature that translates to 1-3% corresponding increase in global precipitation. Increased precipitation as a consequence of global warming is a verifiable empirical scientific fact that refutes any conjecture that desertification can be linked with global warming. If anything, this finding proves that desertification may be a product of global cooling but cannot be caused by global warming.
The facts suggest that much more abundant precipitation as indicated by larger more powerful rivers is characteristic of global warming. If anything, global warming is good news for farmers who depend for their livelihood on rainfall. The geological evidence shows that desertification cannot be produced by global warming.

"Global Warming Will Lead to a Mass Extinction"
Will it Really?

Within the fossil record, conspicuous and permanent disappearance of large numbers of fossil types indicating a sudden drop in biodiversity are observed at several points. These are called mass extinctions, and are well documented (eg. Futuyma, 1998) in spite of the increasing preservation of fossils (Rhode & Muller, 2005). In the Phanerozoic, we observe three major mass extinctions all marking the beginning of the deepest glaciations, whereas biological radiation coincides with the warmer periods (Berner, 1990; Scotese, 2001; also Futuyma, 1998 compared with Royer et al., 2004) when there is a sudden explosion of biological diversity to fill niches not available during colder periods. All but one Phanerozoic mass extinction event exceeding nine families extinct per million years occurs just as mean global temperature falls below 19 degrees Celcius. At the end of the Permian around 250 million years ago, oxygen began to fall as temperatures rose. Large insects and other organisms dependent on atmospheric oxygen levels above 30% began to die out in large numbers. Although carbon dioxide levels rose, this was only by 0.15% compared with an oxygen decrease one hundred times larger, falling 15%. I wonder where all that oxygen went? The previous occurrence of  mass extinction caused by variation to atmospheric composition was 2500 million years ago when shortly after the available iron buffer was oxidised, rising oxygen levels from photosynthesising bacteria wiped out nearly all of the anoxic bacteria on planet Earth, in what Plimer (2001) calls a greater holocaust than anything perpetrated by humans.
While atmospheric composition can prove critical to existing life forms, global mean temperature falling through 19 degrees Celcius is by far the most consistent parameter correlated with mass extinction. When major volcanic eruptions and major impacts are said to cause a mass extinction, the common mechanism thought to kill off life is the process by which dust that gets thrown up into the atmosphere filters the sun's radiation and triggers an ice age that removes ecological niches that many species are dependent on. It is global cooling that brings about mass extinction and not global warming. In fact there are no examples of an extinction event during a warm period that are not explained by other more critical mechanisms.
The most recent mass extinction occurred during the last ice age, and the role of desertification in the extinction of the Australian mega fauna is spectacularly apparent in the vicinity of the Willandra Lakes. Here, the last fresh water of the region drew long term occupation by Indigenous Australian people, who survived the drought conditions living off the shellfish, and the animals that came to drink at the lakes (Bowler, 1971; Hope, 1978).
Speculation that global warming may kill off the Polar bear is flawed because the Polar bear has survived several previous warm ages, some dwarfing the present warm age in both heat and suddenness. If anything, the modern extinction of species has a much more direct link to Homo Sapiens than global warming. Modern causes of extinction of species are much more along the lines of excessive hunting and fishing, raising aqueous particulates to excessive levels in rivers and wetlands, biological contamination and the release of vermin, improperly processed chemical waste, littering, water table poisoning, poaching and other extreme sports (particularly those that destroy habitat such as digging mud holes with 4x4s), aquifer contamination, jettisoning ballast in seas outside the abyssal plains zones, deforestation, overuse of fertiliser and pesticides, and inappropriate agriculture (eg. cotton growing on a desert island like Australia and farming without cultivating associated productive symbiotic woodlands). Such things as these are actual human activities and while the human being can be linked with the extinction of many species, global warming is linked with the evolution of new species to fill the new niches made available by warmer climates that are ultimately more amenable to life.
The evidence clearly shows that global warming brings about the opposite of mass extinction. We are currently near the bottom extreme of global mean temperatures on Earth, and global warming can only bring us closer to what are more normal temperatures for planet earth. The evidence shows that global warming is good for the environment because by opening up new viable ecological niches to life, global warming increases biodiversity.

"Global Warming is Caused by Carbon Dioxide from Fossil Fuel Combustion "
Oh, Really?

The Largest Human Contribution to Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide.

Carbon dioxide is produced by many natural sources including volcanoes, animals, and plants when aspiring at night. Carbon dioxide has been as high as 7000ppm and back in the Devonian, corals evolved when carbon dioxide levels were more than seven times the present concentration. Forests first appeared in force during the Carboniferous when carbon dioxide levels were at least 1000ppm. The horticultural benefits of high carbon dioxide levels are well known (Sylvan, 1992). In fact, it has been widely and repeatedly found both through historical (IE tree ring studies of year to year growth) and experimental studies of plant growth with reference to annual atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations, that higher carbon dioxide levels lead to much greater plant growth (eg. Kimball, 1983; Cure & Acock, 1986; Mortensen, 1987, Lawler & Mitchell, 1991; Drake & Leadley, 1991; Gifford, 1992; Poorter, 1993, Kimball et al., 2007). In fact, both terrestrial (McNaughton, 1989) and aquatic (Cyr & Face, 1993) animal life have prospered due to increased plant growth resulting from rising carbon dioxide levels, proving that of all industrial emissions, carbon dioxide is not a pollutant but is in fact a natural aerial fertiliser. The fact that carbon pooling as a result of plant growth, accelerates in response to rising carbon dioxide levels strongly suggests that currently increasing carbon dioxide levels have more to do with loss of photosynthesising carbon sinks than existing sources of atmospheric carbon such as fossil fuel combustion.
Soils annually contribute between 76.5 & 80.4 gigatons of carbon to the atmosphere (Raich & Potter, 1995; Raich et al., 2002), dwarfing the 7.823 gigatons of carbon emission attributed to the combustion of fossil fuels (IPCC, 2007). The IPCC's figure of 2.38 gigatons of annual carbon emission to the atmosphere from deforestation roughly corresponds to results from the studies of Melillo et al. (1996) and Haughton & Hackler (2002). As we shall see, it is the balance of much larger sources and sinks of carbon dioxide that will play the greatest role in determining atmospheric carbon dioxide levels.
While the origin of much of the modern atmospheric carbon dioxide is speculated to be industrial, carbon dioxide levels vary substantially on a seasonal basis and correlate inversely with smaller seasonal variations in atmospheric oxygen concentrations (Keeling et al., 1996). However, the relationship between atmospheric carbon dioxide and oxygen concentration curves reflects decreasing photosynthesis, which Lyons (2007) documents as the almost exclusive producer of oxygen. While we are busily distracted with the assumption that fossil fuel combustion is the main cause of the rise observed in atmospheric carbon dioxide, we forget to consider the role of decreasing photosynthesis consequent to deforestation.
According to Schlesinger (1991), the carbon reservoir represented by photosynthesising biota is around 560 gigatons. Deforestation to the tune of 156 gigatons since 1850 (Haughton & Hackler, 2002) represents a total deforestation of 22%. Although current photosynthesising biota account for 120 gigatons of atmospheric carbon sequestration (Bowes, 1991), this figure would be closer to 154 gigatons of carbon sequestration back in 1850 given the impact of deforestation on photosynthesizing biota. The total accumulated loss of atmospheric carbon sequestration since 1850 is currently more than 38 gigatons (Casey, 2008); greater than four times the amount of carbon released by fossil fuel combustion to the atmosphere. The dominant human activity contributing to the rise of atmospheric carbon dioxide is not fossil fuel combustion but the deficit in photosynthesis accumulated over more than 150 years of deforestation.

The Relationship of Carbon Dioxide and Mean Global Temperature

Although Berner (1990) maintains that the carbon dioxide record supports carbon dioxide greenhouse mechanism as a major control on climate, Berner and others (eg. Royer et al., 2004) fail to establish causality in their argument (Shaviv & Veizer, 2004). The data of Berner (1990) and (Royer et al., 2004) does indicate a very minor correlation between carbon dioxide levels and temperature that is even coarser when compared to the carbon dioxide curve of Berner (2001). However, contrary to the conclusion of Royer et al. (2004), Shaviv & Veizer (2004) accurately point out that this correlation (if any) is dwarfed by the imperfect correlation of cosmic radiation levels with global temperature - as you can see in the comparative graph of Phanerozoic climate variables I've depicted at the beginning of this chapter. The fall of carbon dioxide across the Phanerozoic is not followed by a corresponding fall in temperature. If anything, the much higher frequency of temperature variation is only matched by minor spikes along the carbon dioxide decay that vary in timing with the occurrence of corresponding temperature spikes. If we ignore the apparent timing problems in the frequency correlation, the deviation of amplitude correlation between carbon dioxide and temperature is still much higher than that for cosmic radiation and temperature. This evidence suggests that cosmic radiation, if anything plays a more dominant role than carbon dioxide in climate change. What is notable in the data graphed by Royer et al. (2004) is that temperature response to variations in cosmic radiation becomes less exaggerated but less delayed as variations in cosmic radiation increase.
The secondary correlation of carbon dioxide with temperature is further qualified by two more factors. Firstly, the magnitude of carbon dioxide's greenhouse effect becomes geometrically smaller as carbon dioxide concentration increases. For example, the gross effect of carbon dioxide increases on global mean temperature since 1900 is less than 0.2 degrees Celsius (Archibald, 2007). Secondly, closer inspection of the data collected from the Vostok ice cores shows that variations in carbon dioxide levels lag behind variations in temperature (Caillon et al., 2003). If carbon dioxide did indeed control global mean temperature, then it would be global mean temperature response that lags carbon dioxide and not vice versa. It would seem likely therefore, that global warming accelerates processes that contribute to the accumulation of atmospheric carbon dioxide. One such process could be the greater proliferation of respiring fauna relative to photosynthesising flora as warming intensifies.

The Evidence...

The evidence demonstrates that the most significant anthropological contribution to atmospheric carbon dioxide is not the combustion of fossil fuels, it is deforestation (80%). The evidence also demonstrates that carbon dioxide is not a cause of global warming, even if it has a minor feedback effect.

Economics & Politics

Oil Crisis & Carbon Storage Opportunity...

Liquid carbon dioxide has been observed flowing from hydrothermal vents at NW Eifuku; about 1600m below sea level (Lupton et al., 2006). Fluids of high carbon dioxide concentration have been observed venting before (Sakai, 1990) and carbon dioxide is known to form submarine lakes in very deep water being much denser than seawater at 3000-3800 metres below sea level reaching a maximum density at 3500m (Nealson, 2006). However, carbon dioxide lakes can form and remain stable in as little as 1400m of sea water in spite of being less dense than sea water and this is due to a cap or "pavement" of carbon dioxide hydrate (Inagaki et al., 2006).
As many low permeability petroleum reservoirs are at depths well below 3000m, there is now an opportunity to exploit low permeability reserves. Drilling development wells down dip from the suspended production well would allow carbon dioxide to be injected into the formation down dip. Under pressure from both the weighted mud column and the pumps, carbon dioxide could enter the reservoir as a dense fluid to raise the formation pressure and ultimately the pressure differential at the production well sufficiently to force petroleum fluids to flow into the production well.
If the technological development for penetration of aquifers with liquid carbon dioxide is funded by the tax payer, and if the taxpayer might be generous enough to fund some of the logistics of collecting and transporting sufficient amounts of carbon dioxide to well sites, an alternative source of petroleum large enough to end the current oil crisis will become available. However, I have to wonder how the tax payer who typically thinks that fuel costs too much, would want to donate hard earned taxes to indirectly subsidise the petroleum industry?
As it happens, the global warming scare has convinced tax payers to tolerate politicians injecting huge amounts of taxation revenue into research centred on carbon storage in suitable reservoirs. Such reservoirs will of course, only provide reliable storage if they have a good structure and seal. Otherwise, the carbon dioxide will find its way to the surface without the help of tectonic activity. Such structures are best known in the petroleum industry, so it makes sense that regardless of the lack of admission that carbon dioxide is intended to be stored in petroleum reservoirs (and perhaps helping to displace oil and gas that would not otherwise flow), this is ultimately where carbon dioxide will be stored if the carbon storage scheme goes ahead.

Incriminating Behaviour

The one thing the Flat Earth theorists, Creationists, and religious fundamentalists including Church of God, Assemblies of God, the Holy Inquisition, and Al Qaeda have in common is that they all try to discredit the idea by attacking the person, instead of attacking the data to discredit the idea. To further their own agenda, such cults deploy various fallacies because in place of truthful arguments about verifiable facts; polemics, fallacies, and outright fraud sound convincing (Archer, 1988a, 1988b, 1988c, 1988d; Brown, 1988; Falconer, 1988; Ritchie, 1988; Strahan, 1988; Price, 1990; Plimer, 1994). I have observed the same pattern of behaviour amongst the global warming catastrophist camp (Royer et al., 2004; Oreskes, 2004; Armitage, 2005; Jones et al., 1990; Wang et al., 1990) with fallacies & abuses exposed by (Shaviv & Veizer, 2004; by McIntyre & McKitrick, 2003, 2005; Wegman et al., 2006; Carter, 2007; Keenan, 2007; Harper, 2007). Windshuttle & Elliot (1999) discuss the difference between a false argument or fallacy and a correct argument.
The attribution of a rise in mean temperature trends coincident with industrialisation to carbon emissions produced by industrialisation is clearly demonstrated by Archibald (2007) to be based on a false cause. Slurs such as the increasingly common application of the label, "Flat-Earther" to anyone who attempts to discuss the implications of global warming from an evidence based perspective are ad homenim (Carter, 2007). Ad homenim attacks are becoming increasingly frequent and beginning to find their way into peer reviewed literature (Eg. Armitage, 2005).
Claims of scientific consensus behind the idea that global warming is a cause for alarm combine appeal to popularity with appeal to authority (Oreskes, 2004). In an interesting twist, more than 19000 U.S. scientists have signed the petition against measures to be implemented for the reduction of anthropogenic contributions to greenhouse gases (http://www.oism.org/pproject). This raises questions about fraud when considered alongside scientific consensus claims.
While the "hockey stick" of Mann et al. (1998, 1999) is soundly discredited (by McIntyre & McKitrick, 2003, 2005; Wegman et al., 2006), its proponents claimed that this discrediting of the hockey stick did not matter. As it turns out, surface based thermometer readings produce a "hockey stick" of their own. The hockey stick path of these measurements has been explained by the heat island effect inherent in temperature readings taken mostly from towns and cities where human activity raises mean daily temperatures substantially as the towns and cities grow. While the vast majority of the temperature recorders are situated in towns and cities - some within effective distance of exhaust vents, heated buildings and bitumen car parks, Wang et al. (1990) & Jones et al. (1990) claimed to have verified the exclusion of heat island effected instrumentation from the current instrumental hockey-stick. Keenan (2007) completely discredits this claim and alleges in a peer-reviewed journal article, that it was made fraudulently.
As with religious extremists, the behaviour of global warming catastrophists becomes increasingly serious. Harper (2007) reports that proponents of the global warming panic have used death threats in an attempt to silence those who seek to publicly discuss the evidence. Although not the objective of this article, I intend to dedicate a separate page on this site to both global warming and Creationist howlers for the purpose of demonstrating both the similarities of Creationist tactics with global warming catastrophist tactics and the various kinds of fallacy used to deceive or otherwise coerce the public into adopting an idea that is not supported by evidence.
Intellectual extortion is a tactic universally employed by political and religious zealots of every stripe. A focus on the unacceptable consequences however speculative, of making the wrong choice about global warming demonstrates a tactic common to religious fundamentalists. Of particular note are the Creationists who threaten those who disagree with them with the rather speculative prospect of eternal damnation in Hell. It appears that the global warming catastrophists are likewise trying to short-circuit rationality with the threat of eternal damnation in Hell on Earth if we don't collectively accept their dogma. Whether we fret about the, "The Day After Tomorrow", or simply ponder, "An Inconvenient Truth", we are all being threatened by these people, whether with purely speculative environmental consequences or direct threat's to our own persons implicit in the libel and death threats deployed against the critics of alarmism. This pattern of behaviour proves independently of the scientific evidence that alarmism over global warming lacks merit and is likely to form part of an elaborate economic swindle. One of the popular pieces of research used to bludgeon reason from the public is the work of Nisbet (1990) on the discovery of methane trapped in ice and permafrost around the world. On this planet, methane is a limited resource and the climate has been much warmer in the past without the so called, "runaway methane global warming". Certainly, if any events of Planet Earth's past were indeed "runaway" events, the conditions would remain permanently and immutable to human intervention. If anything, the nearest to thing to runaway events this planet has ever experienced was the loss of methane to anoxic bacteria (Plimer, 2001), the oxygenation of the atmosphere by photosynthesising bacteria 2500 million years ago (Plimer 2001), and most recently the loss of much of the planet's carbon dioxide over the last billion years to photosynthesis.

Conclusion

The scientific evidence does not support alarm over global warming. Global warming is not unprecedented, neither in rate nor in magnitude. While global warming may lead to sea level rises, melting continental ice will avail arable farmland; an increasingly diminishing commodity that is of greater benefit to humanity than some over-priced waterfront real-estate. Global warming will result in the retreat of deserts further extending arable farmland. Global warming will also result in biological radiation making it easier for us to conserve the biodiversity many of us are so fond of. Increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide is not a cause of global warming and is either an indirect product of warming or a product of deforestation.
Investigation of the evidence exposes a number of tactical omissions, errors, and perhaps a hoax or two on the part of the catastrophists. Tactics employed by those pushing a catastrophist agenda are consistent with those used by other branches of pseudoscience such as Creationism. The lack of support for alarm over global warming by scientific evidence is certainly sufficient reason for some to evade discussion of the evidence by focussing on attacking those who do wish to address the evidence. There are strong economic and political arguments in favour of ignoring the evidence and using alarm over global warming as propaganda to sell the government funding of research and initiatives that will benefit select commercial sectors to the exclusion of the tax payer.
The observed expansion of deserts during the current mildly "warm" period is unprecedented in geological history. Deforestation is the only cause of desertification aside from global cooling and represents the principle human contribution to atmospheric carbon dioxide. Yet, the emphasis of public attention on exaggerated greenhouse effects only serves to divert public scrutiny from vastly more practical and important issues such as moderating land clearance, not to mention the desperate need for communities to decentralise sufficiently to bring most services within walking distance of most residences (thereby reducing reliance on motorised transport) before the impact of peak oil. It would appear that the catastrophist movement is more concerned with curbing development in underdeveloped countries than with vital environmental issues like the expansion of deserts as a consequence of excessive and unnecessary deforestation. Tragically, although desertification as a direct result of excessive land clearance is a far greater threat to the ability of our environment to support current human populations, this very real and well documented threat is neglected in favour of what amounts to little more than sensationalised science fiction.

Bibliography

Alley, R. B., & deMenocal, P. B., 1998, "Abrupt Climate Changes Revisited: How Serious and How Likely?", USGCRP Seminar, 23 February - See: (http://www.usgcrp.gov/usgcrp/seminars/980217DD.html)
Archer, M., 1988a, "Evolution as a Science: One aspect of a very large universe", in D. R. Selkirk & F. J. Burrows (Eds.), Confronting Creationism: Defending Darwin, New South Wales University Press, pp. 14-26, ISBN: 0-86840-178-1
Archer, M., 1988b, "The Reality of Organic Evolution: Evidence from the living", in D. R. Selkirk & F. J. Burrows (Eds.), Confronting Creationism: Defending Darwin, New South Wales University Press, pp. 27-40, ISBN: 0-86840-178-1
Archer, M., 1988c, "Evidence for Evolution from the Fossil Record", in D. R. Selkirk & F. J. Burrows (Eds.), Confronting Creationism: Defending Darwin, New South Wales University Press, pp. 72-102, ISBN: 0-86840-178-1
Archer, M., 1988d, "Squaring off Against Evolution: The Creationist challenge", in D. R. Selkirk & F. J. Burrows (Eds.), Confronting Creationism: Defending Darwin, New South Wales University Press, pp. 103-143, ISBN: 0-86840-178-1
Archibald, D., 2007, "Climate Outlook to 2030", Energy and Environment, in press.
Armitage, K. C., 2005, "State of Denial: The United States and the politics of global warming", Globalisations, V. 2, pp. 417-427
Barron, L. M., Lishmund, S. R., Oakes, G. M., Barron, B. J., & Sutherland, F. L., 1994, "A new model for the origin of some diamonds", Abstacts Geological Society of Australia.
Batterham, R., 2000, "The Chance to Change: final report by the Chief Scientist", ISBN: 0-642-72204-8
Beerling, D. J., & Royer, D. L., 2002, "Fossil Plants as Indicators of the Phanerozoic Global Carbon Cycle", Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, v. 30, pp. 527-556.
Berner, R.A., 1990, "Atmospheric carbon dioxide levels over Phanerozoic time", Science, v. 249, pp. 1382-1386.
Berner, R.A., 2001, "Modeling Atmospheric Oxygen Over Phanerozoic Time", Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, v. 65, pp. 685-694.
Berner, R. A., Beerling, D. J., Dudley, R., Robinson, J. M., & Wildman Jr., R. A., 2003, "Phanerozoic Atmospheric Oxygen", Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, v. 31, pp. 105-134.
Boucot, A. J., Xu, C., and Scotese, C. R., 2004, "Phanerozoic climate zones and paleogeography with consideration of atmospheric CO2 levels", Paleontologicheskiy Zhurnal, v. 2, pp. 3-11
Bowes, G., 1991, "Growth at Elevated CO2: Photosynthetic Responses Mediated through Rubisco", Plant Cell & Environment, v. 14. pp. 795-806
Bowler, J. M., 1971, "Pleistocene Salinities and Climatic Change: Evidence from Lakes and Lunettes in Southeastern Australia.", Aboriginal Man and Environment in Australia, Australian National University Press, Canberra, ISBN: 0-7081-0452-5, pp. 47-65.
Bowler, J. M., 1975, "Deglacial Events in Southern Australia: Their Age, Nature, and Palaeoclimactic Significance.", Bulletin 13, The Royal Society of New Zealand, Wellington, pp. 75-82.
Broen, R., 1988, "This Universe Unfolds", in D. R. Selkirk & F. J. Burrows (Eds.), Confronting Creationism: Defending Darwin, New South Wales University Press, pp. 41-48, ISBN: 0-86840-178-1
Caillon, N., Severinghaus, J. P., Jouzel, J., Barnola, J-M, Kang, J,. Lipenkov, V. Y., 2003, "Timing of Atmospheric CO2 and Antarctic Temperature Changes Across Termination III", Science, v. 299, pp. 1728-1731
Carter, R M, 2007. "The Myth of Dangerous Human-Caused Climate Change", Proceedings The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (AusIMM) 2007 New Leaders’ Conference, Melbourne, pp. 61-74
Casey, T., 2008, "Deforestation and Carbon Emission", http://deforestation.geologist-1011.net
Chambers, D. P., Urban, T. J., Fujii, D., & Nerem, R. S., 2001, "Variations in Global Mean Sea Level from a Combination of Tide Gauges and Altimetry", Eos Trans. AGU, 82(47),
Fall Meet. Suppl., Abstract G31D-02
Chen, J. L., Wilson, C. R., Chambers, D. P., Nerem, R. S., & Tapely, B. D., 1998, "Seasonal Global Water Mass Budget and Mean Sea Level Variations", Geophysical Research Letters, v. 25. pp. 3555-3558
Christensen, C. M., 2000, "The Innovator's Dilemma", ISBN0-06-662069-4
Church, J. A., White, N. J., & Arblaster, J. M., 2005, "Significant decadal-scale impact of volcanic eruptions on sea level and ocean heat content", Nature, v. 438 pp. 74-77
Church, J. A., White, N. J., & Hunter, J. R., 2006, "Sea-level rise at tropical Pacific and Indian Ocean islands", Global & Planetary Change, v. 53, pp. 155-168
Cure, J. D., & Acock, B., 1986, "Crop responses to carbon dioxide doubling: a literature survey" Agricultural &. Forest Meteorology, v. 8, pp. 127-145
Cyr, H. and Face, M. L., 1993, "Magnitude and patterns of herbivory in aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems", Nature, v. 361, pp. 148-150
Dansgaard, W., Johnsen, S.J., Moller, J., 1969, "One thousand centuries of climatic record from Camp Century on the Greenland Ice Sheet.", Science v. 166(3903), pp.377-381.
Douglas, B. C., 1997, "Global Sea Rise: A Redetermination", Surveys in Geophysics v. 18, pp. 279-292
Drake, B. G. & Leadley, P. W., 1991, "Canopy photosynthesis of crops and native plant communities exposed to long-term elevated CO2", Plant Cell and Environment, v. 14, pp. 853-860
Falconer, I., 1988, "Evolution and Christian Belief", in D. R. Selkirk & F. J. Burrows (Eds.), Confronting Creationism: Defending Darwin, New South Wales University Press, pp. 144-152, ISBN: 0-86840-178-1
Futuyma, D. J., 1998, Evolutionary Biology, Sinauer Ass.
Gifford, R. M., 1992, "Interaction of carbon dioxide with growth-limiting environmental factors: implications for the global carbon cycle", Advances in Bioclimatology, v. 1, pp. 24-58
Gravestock, D. I., & Cowley, W. M., 1995, "Arrowie Basin", in J. F. Drexel & W. V. Priess (Eds.), The Geology of South Australia: The Phanerozoic, Bulletin 54, Geological Survey, ISBN: 0-7308-0621-9, v. 2, p. 30
Hallam, A., 1989, "The Case for Sea-Level Change as a Dominant Causal Factor in Mass Extinction of Marine Invertebrates", Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B {Biological Sciences}, v. 325, pp. 437-455
Harper, T., 2007, "Scientists Threatened for 'Climate Denial'", The Sunday Telegraph, ISO:2007-Mar-11, UK.
Houghton, R. A., & Hackler, J. L., 2002, "Carbon Flux to the Atmosphere from Land-Use Changes. In Trends: A Compendium of Data on Global Change", Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy, Oak Ridge, Tenn., U.S.A.
Hill, A. J., & Gravestock, D. I., 1995, "Cooper Basin", in J. F. Drexel & W. V. Priess (Eds.), The Geology of South Australia: The Phanerozoic, Bulletin 54, Geological Survey, ISBN: 0-7308-0621-9, v. 2, pp. 78-87
Hope, J. H., 1978, "Pleistocene mammal Extinctions: The problem of Mungo and Menindee, New South Wales", Alcheringa, ISSN: 0311-5518, v. 2, pp. 65-82
Huang, S., Pollack, H. N., & Shen, P. Y., 1997, “Late Quaternary Temperature Changes Seen in Worldwide Continental Heat Flow Measurements.” Geophysical Research Letters v. 24, pp. 1947-1950.
Inagaki, F., Kuypers, M. M. M., Tsunogai, U., Ishibashi, J. i., Nakamura, K. i., Treude, T., Ohkubo, S., Nakaseama, M., Gena, K., Chiba, H., Hirayama, H., Nunoura, T., Takai, K., Jørgensen, B. B., Horikoshi, K., & Boetius, A., 2006, "Microbial community in a sediment-hosted CO2 lake of the southern Okinawa Trough hydrothermal system", Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, v. 103, pp. 14164-14169
IPCC, 2007, "Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report - Summary for Policymakers", Fourth Assessment Report
Jones P.D., Groisman P.Y., Coughlan M., Plummer N., Wang W.-C., Karl T.R., 1990, “Assessment of urbanization effects in time series of surface air temperature over land”, Nature, v. 347, pp. 169–172
Keeling, R. F., Piper, S. C., & Heinmann, M., 1996, "Global and Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide Sinks Deduced From Changes in Atmospheric Oxygen Concentrations", Nature, v. 381, pp. 218-221
Keenan, D. J., 2007, "The Fraud Allegation Against some Climatic Research OF Wei-Chyung Wang", Energy & Environment, v.18, pp. 985-995
Keigwin L.D., 1996, "The Little Ice Age and Medieval Warm Period in the Sargasso Sea", Science, v.274 pp.1504-1508
Kimball, B. A., 1983, "Carbon dioxide and agricultural yield: an assemblage and analysis of 430 prior observations", Agronomy Journal, v. 75, pp. 779-788
Kimball, B. A., Idso, S. B., Johnson, S., Rillig, M. C., 2007, "Seventeen years of carbon dioxide enrichment of sour orange trees: final results", Global Change Biology, v. 13, pp. 2171–2183
Kump, L. R., 2008, "The Rise of Atmospheric Oxygen", Nature, v. 451, pp. 277-278
Lawlor, D. W. and Mitchell, R. A. C., 1991, "The effects of increasing CO2 on crop photosynthesis and productivity : a review of field studies", Plant Cell and Environment, v. 14, pp. 807-818
Lisitzin, E., 1974, "Sea level changes", Elsevier Oceanography Series, 8.
Lupton, J., Butterfield, D., Lilley, M., Evans, L., Nakamura, K., Chadwick Jr., W., Resing, J., Embley, R., Olson, E., Proskurowski, G., Baker, E., de Ronde, C., Roe, K., Greene, R., Lebon, G., & Young, C., 2006, "Submarine venting of liquid carbon dioxide on a Mariana Arc volcano", Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst, 7, Q08007, doi:10.1029/2005GC001152
Lyons, T., 2007, "Palaeoclimate: Oxygen's Rise Reduced", Nature, v. 448, pp. 1005-1006
McIntyre, S., & McKitrick, R., 2003, "Corrections to the Mann et al. (1998) proxy database and northern hemispheric average temperature series", Energy and Environment, v. 14: 751-771.
McIntyre, S., & McKitrick, R., 2005, "Hockey sticks, principal components, and spurious significance", Geophysical Research Letters v. 32: doi 10.1029/2004GL021750
McNaughton, S. J., Oesterhold, M., Frank. D. A., and Williams, K. J., 1989, "Ecosystem-level patterns of primary productivity and herbivory in terrestrial habitats", Nature v. 341, pp. 142-144
Mann, M. E., Bradley, R. S., & Hughes, M. K., 1998, "Global-scale temperature patterns and climate forcing over the past six centuries", Nature, v. 392, pp. 779-787
Mann, M. E., Bradley, R. S., & Hughes, M. K., 1999, "Northern Hemisphere temperatures during the past millennium: Inferences, uncertainties, and limitations", Geophysical Research Letters, v. 26, pp. 759-762
Marsden, M. A. H., 1988, "Upper Devonian-Carboniferous", in J. G. Douglas & J. A. Ferguson (Eds.), Geology of Victoria, pp. 147-194. ISBN: 0-909869-67-7
Melillo, J. M., Houghton, R. A., Kicklighter, D. W., & McGuire, A. D., 1996, "Tropical Deforestation and the Global Carbon Budget", Annual Review of Energy and the Environment, v. 21, pp 293-310
Miall, A. D., 1996, "The Geology of Fluvial Deposits: sedimentary facies, basin analysis, and petroleum geology", ISBN: 3-540-59186-9
Miall, A. D., 1997, "The Geology of Stratigraphic Sequences", ISBN:0-387-59348-9
Mortensen, L. M., 1987, "CO2 enrichment in greenhouses. Crop responses (review)", Scientia horticulturae, v. 33, pp. 1-25
Nealson, K., 2006, "Lakes of liquid CO2 in the deep sea", Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, v. 103, n. 38, pp. 13903-13904
Nisbet, E., 1990, "Climate change and methane," Nature, v. 347, p. 23
Oreskes, N., 2004, "BEYOND THE IVORY TOWER: The Scientific Consensus on Climate Change", Science, v. 306, p. 1686
Pittock, A. B., 1975, "Climatic Change and the Patterns of Variation in Australian Rainfall.", Search, Vol. 6, pp. 498-503.
Plimer, I. R., 1994, "Telling Lies for God: reason vs creationism", Random House, ISBN: 0-09-182852-X
Plimer, I. R., 2001, "a short history of planet earth", ABC Books, ISBN: 0-7333-1004-4
Poorter, H., 1993, "Effect of elevated atmospheric CO2 on growth, photosynthesis and respiration", Vegetatio v. 104/105, pp. 77-97
Press, F., & Seiver, R., 1982, "Earth", ISBN: 0-7167-1362-4
Price, B., 1990, "The Creation Science Controversy", Morehouse, ISBN: 0855748893
Raich, J. W., & C. S., Potter. 1995, "Global Patterns of Carbon Dioxide Emissions from Soils", Global Biogeochemical Cycles v. 9(1), pp. 23-36
Raich, J. W., Potter, C. S., & Bhagawati, D., 2002, "Interannual variability in global soil respiration, 1980-94", Global Change Biology, v. 8, pp. 800-812
Raup, D., & Sepkoski, J., 1982, "Mass extinctions in the marine fossil record", Science, v. 215 pp.1501-1503
Reading, H. G., 1996, "Sedimentary Environments: processes, facies, and stratigraphy", Blackwell Science P/L, ISBN: 0-632-03627-3.
Ritchie, A., 1988, "Testimony of the Rocks or Geology Versus the Flood", in D. R. Selkirk & F. J. Burrows (Eds.), Confronting Creationism: Defending Darwin, New South Wales University Press, pp. 49-71, ISBN: 0-86840-178-1
Rohde, R.A, & Muller, R.A, 2005, "Cycles in fossil diversity", Nature v. 434, pp. 209-210
Royer, D. L., Berner, R. A., Montañez, I. P., Tabor, N. J., Beerling, D. J., 2004, "CO2 as a primary driver of Phanerozoic climate", GSA Today, v. 14, pp.4-10, ISSN: 1052-5173
Ruddiman, W. F., 2001, "Earth's Climate, Past and Future", Freeman & Co., New York, ISBN: 0716737418.
Sakai, H., Gamo, T., Kim, E. S., Tsutsumi, M., Tanaka, T., Ishibashi, J., Wakita, H., Yamano, M., & Oomori, T., 1990, "Venting of Carbon Dioxide-Rich Fluid and Hydrate Formation in Mid-Okinawa Trough Backarc Basin", Science, v. 248, pp. 1093-1096
Schlesinger, W. H., 1991, "Climate, Environment, and Ecology", NASA no. 19990036602. Climate Change: Science, Impacts and Policy; UNITED STATES.
Schönwiese, C., 1995, "Klimaänderungen: Daten, Analysen, Prognosen", Springer, Heidelberg
Scotese, C. R., 2001, "Paleomap Project", http://www.scotese.com/climate.htm
Selkirk, D. R., & Burrows, F. J., 1988, "Confronting Creationism: Defending Darwin", ISBN: 0-86840-178-1.
Sepkoski, J., 2002, "A Compendium of Fossil Marine Animal Genera" (eds. Jablonski, D. & Foote, M.), Bulletin of American Paleontology. no. 363 (Paleontological Research Institution, Ithaca, NY)
Shaviv, N., Veizer, J., 2004, "CO2 as a primary driver of Phanerozoic climate: COMMENT", GSA Today, Published online: June 2004, http://www.gsajournals.org/perlserv/?request=get-static&name=i1052-5173-14-3-e4
Singer, F. S., & Avery, T. A., 2006, "Unstoppable Global Warming: Every 1,500 Years", ISBN: 0742551245.
Spencer, R. W., Braswell, W. D., Christy, J. R., & Hnilo, J., 2007, "Cloud and radiation budget changes associated with tropical intraseasonal oscillations", Geophysical Research Letters, v. 34, pp. 1-5
Strahan, R., 1988, "The Creationist Crusade", in D. R. Selkirk & F. J. Burrows (Eds.), Confronting Creationism: Defending Darwin, New South Wales University Press, pp. 1-13, ISBN: 0-86840-178-1
Sylvan, H. W., 1992, "Carbon Dioxide is Good for Plants", Policy Review (Michigan State University), Fall Issue
Tuchman, B. W., 1987, "A Distant Mirror: The Calamitous 14th Century", ISBN: 0345349571
Veizer, J., Godderis, Y., & François, L. M., 2000, "Evidence for decoupling of atmospheric CO2 and global climate during the Phanerozoic eon", Nature, v. 408, pp. 698-701
Wang W. C., Zeng Z., Karl T.R., 1990, “Urban heat islands in China”, Geophysical Research Letters, v. 17, pp. 2377-2380
Watts, A.B., 2001, "Isostasy and Flexure of the Lithosphere", Cambridge University Press
Wasson, R. J., & Bowler, J. M., 1984, "Glacial Age Environments of Inland Australia.", Late Cainozoic Palaeoclimates of the Southern Hemisphere.", A. A. Balkema, Rotterdam, ISBN:90-6191-554-6, pp. 183-208
Webby, B. D., 1972, "Devonian Geological History of the Lachlan Geosyncline", Journal of the Geological Society of Australia, V. 19, pp. 99-123.
Wegman, E. J., Scott, D. W., and Said, Y. H., 2006. Ad hoc committee report on the ‘Hockey Stick’ global climate reconstruction, http://republicans.energycommerce.house.gov/108/home/07142006_Wegman_Report.pdf
Wentz, F., J., Ricciardulli, L., Hilburn, K., & Mears, C., 2007, "How Much More Rain Will Global Warming Bring?", Science, v. 317, pp. 233-235
White, M. E., 1994, "After the Greening: The Browning of Australia", ISBN: 086417585X
Windshuttle, K., & Elliot, E., 1999, "Writing, Researching, Communicating: communication skills for the modern age", ISBN: 0-074-70703-5, pp. 340-352.
Wopfner, H., 1969, "Palaeozoic Era", in L. W. Parkin (ed.), Handbook of South Australian Geology, Geological Survey of South Australia, pp. 84-132