BREAKING: PUTIN CALLS OBAMA “MUSLIM TERRORIST” ON LIVE T.V. AND CALLS TRUMP TO ARREST HIM.DO YOU AGREE WITH THIS?
This is the full transcript of Corriere della Sera’s interview with Vladimir Putin
Luciano Fontana: I would like to start with a question concerning Russian-Italian relations. This relationship has always been close and privileged, both in the economic and political spheres. However, it has been somewhat marred by the crisis in Ukraine and the sanctions. Could the recent visit by Italian Prime Minister Matteo Renzi to Russia and your upcoming visit to Milan somehow change this trend, and if so, what is needed for that?
Vladimir Putin: First, I
firmly believe that Russia was not responsible for the deterioration in
relations between our country and the EU states. This was not our
choice; it was dictated to us by our partners. It was not we who
introduced restrictions on trade and economic activities. Rather, we
were the target and we had to respond with retaliatory, protective
measures.
But the relationship between Russia and Italy has, indeed, always
been privileged, both in politics and the economy. For instance, in
recent years, that is, in the last couple of years, trade between our
countries increased eleven fold, from what I believe was $4.2 billion –
we make calculations in US dollars – to over $48 billion, nearly $49
billion.There are 400 Italian companies operating in Russia. We are cooperating actively in the energy sector, in an array of fields. Italy is the third largest consumer of our energy resources. We also have many joint high technology projects: in the space and aircraft industries, and in many other sectors. Russian regions are working very closely with Italy. Last year, almost a million Russian tourists, about 900,000, visited Italy. And while there, they spent over a billion euro.
We have always enjoyed trust-based relations in the political sphere as well. The establishment of the Russia-NATO Council was Italy’s initiative – Silvio Berlusconi was Prime Minister at the time. This advisory working body no doubt became an important factor of security in Europe. In this regard, Italy has always contributed greatly to the development of the dialogue between Russia and Europe, and NATO as a whole. Not to mention our special cultural and humanitarian cooperation.
All this, of course, lays the foundation for a special relationship between our countries. And the incumbent Prime Minister’s visit to Russia sent a very important message showing that Italy is willing to develop these relations. It is only natural that this does not go unnoticed either by the Government of the Russian Federation or by the public.
We are, of course, ready to reciprocate and go further in expanding our cooperation as long as our Italian partners are willing to do the same. I hope that my upcoming visit to Milan will help in this respect.
Luciano Fontana: You have known several chairmen of the Italian Council of Ministers – Romano Prodi, Silvio Berlusconi, Massimo D’Alema, Giuliano Amato, Enrico Letta and now Matteo Renzi. With whom did you find that you understood each other best? And how much, in your opinion, does the existence of a personal relationship – like the one you had with Silvio Berlusconi – contribute to good relations between countries?
Vladimir Putin: No matter what posts we occupy or what our jobs are, we are still human, and personal trust is certainly a very important factor in our work, in building relations on the interstate level. One of the people you have just mentioned once told me, “You must be the only person (meaning I was the only person) – who has a friendly relationship with both Berlusconi and Prodi.” I can tell you that it was not difficult for me, I still don’t find it difficult, and I can tell you why. My Italian partners have always put the interests of Italy, of the Italian people, first and believed that in order to serve the interests of their country, including economic and political interests, they must maintain friendly relations with Russia. We have always understood and felt that.
This has been the key element underlying our good relations. I have always sensed a truly sincere interest in building interstate relations irrespective of the domestic political situation. I would like to say in this regard that the attitude people in Russia have developed towards Italy does not depend on which political party is in power.
Paolo Valentino: Mr President, you are coming to Milan for the celebration of the Russia Day at the Universal Exhibition EXPO 2015. The core theme of this year’s exhibition is “Feeding the Planet, Energy for Life.” What is Russia’s contribution to this cause? What does this effort mean for relations between states?
Vladimir Putin: This is one of the major challenges that humanity is facing today. So I can and must acknowledge that the Italian organisers chose one of the key themes for the exhibition.
The world’s population is growing.
According to experts, it will reach 9 billion people by 2050. But even
today, according to the same sources, to the
UN, 850 million people all over the planet
are under nourished or starving, and 100 million of them are children.
So, there is no doubt that this is one of the key issues of our time.
Many other issues, seemingly unrelated, will depend on how we deal with
it. I am talking about instability among other things, that is political
instability of entire regions, terrorism, and so on. All these problems
are interrelated. The surge of illegal migration that has hit
Italy and Europe today is among these
resulting problems. I would like to repeat that, in my view, the
organisers did the right thing pointing out the need to address this
issue.
As for Russia’s contribution, we channel
over $200 million into this through UN programmes. Many countries around
the world receive necessary support and assistance under these
programmes using Russian resources.
We pay significant attention to the
development of agriculture in our country. Notwithstanding all the
difficulties that the development of Russian economy faces today, our
agricultural sector, the sector of agricultural production, has been
growing steadily – last year the growth was around 3.4 3.5 percent. In
the first quarter of the current year, the growth stayed at the same
level, exceeding 3 percent, at 3.4 percent. Russia is now the third
largest grain exporter in the world. Last year, we had a record harvest
of grain crops, one of the largest in recent years – 105.3 million
tonnes. Finally,
Russia has an enormous potential in this
sphere. I think that we have the largest area of arable land in the
world and the biggest fresh water reserves, since Russia is the biggest
country in the world in terms of territory.
Paolo Valentino: Mr.
President, when we were talking about the shadow cast on our relations,
you said that it was not your choice, and there is an opinion that
Russia feels betrayed, abandoned by Europe, like a lover abandoned by
his mistress. What are the problems in these relations today? Do you
think that Europe has been too dependent on the United States in the
Ukrainian crisis? What do you expect from Europe in relation to the
sanctions? I may have asked too many questions at once.
Vladimir Putin: You have certainly asked a lot of questions, with an Italian flair. (Laughs)
First, about the mistress. In this kind of a
relationship with a woman, that is, if you assume no obligations, you
have no right to claim any obligations from your partner.
We have never viewed Europe as a mistress. I
am quite serious now. We have always proposed a serious relationship.
But now I have the impression that Europe has actually been trying to
establish material based relations with us, and solely for its own gain.
There is the notorious Third Energy Package and the denial of access
for our nuclear energy products to the European market despite all the
existing agreements. There is reluctance to acknowledge the legitimacy
of our actions and reluctance to cooperate with integration associations
in the territory of the former Soviet Union. I am referring to the
Customs Union, which we created and which has now grown into the
Eurasian Economic Union.
Because it is all right when integration
takes place in Europe, but if we do the same in the territory of the
former Soviet Union, they try to explain it by Russia’s desire to
restore an empire. I don’t understand the reasons for such an approach.
You see, all of us, including me, have been
talking for a long time about the need to establish a common economic
space stretching from Lisbon to Vladivostok. In fact, French President
Charles de Gaulle said something similar a lot earlier than me. Today
nobody objects to it, everybody says: yes, we should aspire to this.
But what is happening in practice? For
example, the Baltic States have joined the European Union. Good, no
problem. But today we are being told that these countries, which are
part of the energy system of the former Soviet Union and Russia, they
must join the European Union’s energy system. We ask: Are there any
problems with energy supply or with something else? Why is it necessary?
– No, there are no problems, but we have decided that it will be better
this way.
What does this mean for us in practical
terms? It means that we will be forced to build additional generating
capacities in some western regions in Russia. Since electricity
transmission lines went through the Baltic States to some Russian
regions and vice versa, all of them will now be switched over to Europe,
and we will have to build new transmission lines in our country to
ensure electricity supply. This will cost us about 2 2.5 billion euro.
Now let’s look at the EU-Ukraine
Association Agreement. It does not require that Ukraine becomes part of
the European energy system, but it is considered possible. If this
happens, we will have to spend not 2 2.5 billion but, probably, about 8
10 billion euro for the same purpose. The question is: why is this
necessary if we believe in building a common economic space from Lisbon
to Vladivostok? What is the objective of the European Union’s Eastern
Partnership? Is it to integrate the whole former Soviet Union into a
single space with Europe, I repeat for the third time, from Lisbon to
Vladivostok, or to cut something off and establish a new border between
modern Russia and the western territories including, say, Ukraine and
Moldova?
Let me tell you something else now, and you can decide for yourselves what to publish and what to leave out.
What are the roots of the Ukrainian crisis?
Its cause seems to be completely disproportionate to what has become an
utter tragedy today claiming many lives in southeast Ukraine. What
sparked the crisis? Former President Viktor Yanukovych said that he
needed to think about signing Ukraine’s
Association Agreement with the EU, possibly
make some changes and hold consultations with Russia, its major trade
and economic partner. In this connection or under this pretext riots
broke out in Kiev. They were actively supported both by our European and
American partners. Then a coup d’état followed – a totally
anti-constitutional act. The new authorities announced that they were
going to sign the Association Agreement but would delay its
implementation until January 1, 2016. The question is: what was the coup
d’état for? Why did they need to escalate the situation to a civil war?
The result is exactly the same.
What is more, at the end of 2013 we were
ready to give Ukraine $15 billion as a state loan supported by a further
$5 billion via commercial banks; plus we already gave it $3 billion
during the year and promised to cut gas prices by half if they paid
regularly. We were not at all against Ukraine signing an Association
Agreement with the European Union. But, of course, we wanted to
participate in the final decisions, meaning that Ukraine was then and is
still now, today, a member of the CIS free trade area, and we have
mutual obligations as its members.
No comments:
Post a Comment