Wednesday, September 28, 2016

OFFICIAL PROPOSALS OF THE SIMULATED CONVENTION OF STATES

Final_Convention_Report_with_Votes

 OFFICIAL PROPOSALS OF THE SIMULATED CONVENTION OF STATES
 
Adopted September 23, 2016 in Williamsburg, VA
Statement of Convention
:
“The Convention respectfully submits these proposals to the American people with the
conviction that they are a sound
beginning to a critically
-
needed national discussion about
restoring the balance of power between the federal government and the states. Further, it is the
conviction of this body that the states must deliberate and adopt appropriate proposals for a
balanc
ed budget amendment and an amendment to provide the states a means to serve as a check
on judicial overreach by the federal judiciary of the United States.”
[Amendment proposals are listed in the order in which they were adopted]
Fiscal Restraints Proposal 1:
SECTION 1. The public debt shall not be increased except upon a rec
orded vote of two
-
thirds of
each house of Congress, and only for a period not to exceed one year.
SECTION 2. No state or any subdivision thereof shall be compelled or coerced by Congress or
the President to appropriate money.
SECTION 3. The provisions of t
he first section of this amendment shall take effect 3 years after
ratification.
Vote:
45 Support
Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado,
Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas,
Kentucky, Louisiana, Ma
ine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota,
Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey,
New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Oklahoma,
Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennesse
e, Texas,
Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, Wyoming
3 Opposed
Connecticut, Ohio, Oregon
2 Absent/
Abstain
West Virginia, Wisconsin
2
Federal Legislative & Executive Jurisdiction Proposal 1:
SECTION 1. The power of Congress to regulate commerce among the several states shall be
limited to the regulation of the sale, shipment, transportation, or other movement of goods,
articles or persons. Congress may not regulate activity solely because it a
ffects commerce among
the several states.
SECTION 2. The power of Congress to make all laws that are necessary and proper to regulate
commerce among the several states, or with foreign nations, shall not be construed to include the
power to regulate or p
rohibit any activity that is confined within a single state regardless of its
effects outside the state, whether it employs instrumentalities therefrom, or whether its regulation
or prohibition is part of a comprehensive regulatory scheme; but Congress sha
ll have power to
define and provide for punishment of offenses constituting acts of war or violent insurrection
against the United States.
SECTION 3. The Legislatures of the States shall have standing to file any claim alleging
violation of this article.
Nothing in this article shall be construed to limit standing that may
otherwise exist for a person.
SECTION 4. This article shall become effective five years from the date of its ratification.
Vote:
44 Support
Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Californi
a, Connecticut,
Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas,
Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri,
Nebraska, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, North Carolina, North
Dakota, Ohio, Oklaho
ma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina,
South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Washington, West Virginia,
Wisconsin
6 Opposed
Louisiana, Mississippi, Montana, New York, Virginia, Wyoming
0 Absent/
Abstain
None
Federal Term Limits & J
udicial Jurisdiction Proposal 1:
No person shall be elected to more than six full terms in the House of Representatives. No person
shall be elected to more than two full terms in the Senate. These limits shall include the time
served prior to
the enactment of this Article.
Vote:
35 Support
Arkansas, Colorado, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois,
Indiana, Kansas, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi,
Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New
York,
North Carolina, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South
Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Wisconsin,
Wyoming
12 Opposed
Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, California, Connecticut, Kentucky,
Maine, Maryland,
New Hampshire, Ohio, Washington, West Virginia
3
3 Absent/
Abstain
Hawaii, Iowa, Oregon
Federal Legislative & Executive Jurisdiction Proposal 2:
SECTION 1. The Legislatures of the States shall have authority to abrogate any provision of
federal law issued
by the Congress, President, or Administrative Agencies of the United States,
whether in the form of a statute, decree, order, regulation, rule, opinion, decision, or other form.
SECTION 2. Such abrogation shall be effective when the Legislatures of three
-
f
ifths of the
States approve a resolution declaring the same provision or provisions of federal law to be
abrogated. This abrogation authority may also be applied to provisions of federal law existing at
the time this amendment is ratified.
SECTION 3. No go
vernment entity or official may take any action to enforce a provision of
federal law after it is abrogated according to this Amendment. Any action to enforce a provision
of abrogated federal law may be enjoined by a federal or state court of general juris
diction in the
state where the enforcement action occurs, and costs and attorney fees of such injunction shall be
awarded against the entity or official attempting to enforce the abrogated provision.
SECTION 4. No provision of federal law abrogated pursuan
t to this amendment may be
reenacted or reissued for six years from the date of the abrogation.
Vote:
43 Support
Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Florida, Hawaii,
Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts,
M
ichigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire,
New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Oklahoma,
Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee,
Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virgini
a, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin,
Wyoming
5 Opposed
Connecticut, Delaware, Georgia, Iowa, Montana
2 Absent/Abstain
Louisiana, Ohio
Fiscal Restraints Proposal 2:
SECTION 1. Congress shall not impose taxes or other exactions upon incomes, gifts, or es
tates.
SECTION 2. Congress shall not impose or increase any tax, duty, impost or excise without the
approval of three
-
fifths of the House of Representatives and three
-
fifths of the Senate, and shall
separately present such to the President.
SECTION 3. Thi
s Article shall be effective five years from the date of its ratification, at which
time the Sixteenth Article of amendment is repealed.
Vote:
33 Support
Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado,
Connecticut, Delaware, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa
, Kansas, Kentucky, Maryland,
Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota,
Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada,
4
New Hampshire, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, South
Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Vermont, Virginia, West Virginia, Wisconsin
14 Op
posed
Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Maine,
New Jersey, Ohio, Oklahoma,
Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Tennessee, Utah, Washington, Wyoming
3 Absent/Abstain
Hawaii, Louisiana, Mississippi
Federal Legislative & Executive Jurisdiction Proposal 3:
Whenever one quarter of the members of the United States House of Representatives or the
United States Senate transmits to the President their written declaration of opposition to any
proposed or existing federal administrative regulation, in whole or in p
art, it shall require a
majority vote of the House of Representatives and Senate to adopt or affirm that regulation.
Upon the transmittal of opposition, if Congress shall fail to vote within 180 days, such regulation
shall be vacated. No proposed regulatio
n challenged under the terms of this Article shall go into
effect without the approval of Congress. Congressional approval or rejection of a rule or
regulation is not subject to Presidential veto under Article 1, Sect
ion 7 of the U.S. Constitution.
Vote:
42 Support
Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado,
Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky,
Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska,
Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jerse
y, New Mexico, North Carolina, North
Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South Dakota,
Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia,
Wisconsin, Wyoming
5 Opposed
Connecticut, Illinois, Maine, Montana, New York
3 Ab
sent/Abstain
Louisiana, Oregon, Rhode Island

No comments:

Post a Comment