Floodplain executive order: Latest Obama power grab
Another illegal action unlikely to be challenged in court?
Millions
of Americans living and working in floodplains and other low-lying
areas are at acute risk of being inundated – not by rising water, but by
a tidal wave of federal regulations – courtesy of the Obama
Administration.With public attention riveted on the chaotic developments in the Middle East and the severe cold weather that gripped much of the nation over the winter, the White House on January 30 quietly issued Executive Order (EO) 13690, “Establishing a Federal Flood Risk Management Standard and a Process for Further Soliciting and Considering Stakeholder Input.” https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2015/01/30/executive-order-establishing-flood-risk-management-standard-and-
Violating existing law
The executive order is more than just a mouthful; it is the latest federal intrusion into what have traditionally been predominantly self-governing communities. In defiance of existing law, the EO redefines the term “floodplain” to expand the area of the country to be regulated as such. The Obama EO was issued in directIn a March 30 “Dear Colleague” letter, Rep. John Ratcliffe (R-TX) pointed out that, “To date, there has been no public disclosure on
the
basis of the alternatives included in the EO, how they were developed
and decided upon, or a cost-benefit analysis of them.” Ratcliffe further
noted that the EO calls for the National Water Council “to issue
Guidelines to provide guidance to agencies on [the EO’s]
implementation,” even though the National Water Council hasn’t received a
cent of federal funding since 1982.Federal Flood Risk Management Standard
The centerpiece of the Obama executive order is something called the Federal Flood Risk Management Standard (FFRMS). Under the executive order, the FFRMS applies to new construction and substantial improvements to existing structures in floodplains and other low-lying areas. Speaking for the Administration, the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) has claimed repeatedly that the FFRMS will not affect private development. Nothing could be further from the truth.Indeed, the new federal standard will “in fact substantially limit private development,” says Rep. Ratcliffe. “Because federal agencies must avoid or minimize
While the EO is vague on the details of the FFRMS, it says that incorporating the new standard “will ensure that [federal] agencies expand management from the current base flood level to a higher vertical elevation and corresponding horizontal floodplain to address current and
New regulatory regime
Determining
what constitutes “future flood risk” is closely tied to, in the
President’s words, “a national policy on resilience and risk reduction
consistent with my Climate Action Plan.” In other words, the
administration’s policies to “combat climate change” will serve to
justify the myriad rules, regulations, and standards Washington will
impose on communities throughout the country in the name of protecting
them from flooding. A regulatory regime is being put into place that
will give Washington final say over what can and cannot be built and how
structures – residential and commercial – are to be constructed and
where.In taking its micromanagement of American society down to the level of writing local building codes, the Obama Administration is bypassing both Congress and the federal rulemaking process. The goal is very simple: Make the populace, and the elected officials who supposedly represent them, subservient to Washington.
No comments:
Post a Comment