Friday, December 4, 2015

Mass Shooting Tracker

Mass Shooting Tracker


2013 Raw Data 2014 Raw Data 2015 Raw Data
Excel spreadsheet Excel spreadsheet Excel spreadsheet
CSV format CSV format CSV format

The yearly lists can be found on individual pages

2013 Mass Shooting List, 2014 Mass Shooting List. There is also the ongoing 2015 Mass Shooting List

Want to stay current on updates?

Follow our Facebook page, at https://facebook.com/shootingtracker/ or our official Twitter at http://twitter.com/mass_shootings

Media Users

A good citation example is provided by our use on Hardball w/ Chris Matthews
Our license is a simple Creative Commons Attribution license. If you cite to us, all we ask is that you source us with a link for your viewers/readers to http://www.shootingtracker.com In addition, we would appreciate notice through an email to media@shootingtracker.com.

About this Project

Welcome to the mass shooting tracker, as featured by CNN, MSNBC, The Washington Post, The Economist and more.
The most obscene incidents of gun violence usually do not make the mainstream news at all. Why? Because their definition is incorrect. The mainstream news meaning of "Mass Shooting" should more accurately be described as "Mass Murder".
The old FBI definition of Mass Murder (not even the most recent one) is four or more people murdered in one event. It is only logical that a Mass Shooting is four or more people shot in one event.
Here at the Mass Shooting Tracker, we count the number of people shot rather than the number people killed because, "shooting" means "people shot".
For instance, in 2012 Travis Steed and others shot 18 people total. Miraculously, he only killed one. Under the incorrect definition of mass shooting, that event would not be considered a mass shooting! Arguing that 18 people shot during one event is not a mass shooting is absurd.
The only requirement is that four or more people are shot in a spree or setting, likely without a cooling off period. This may include the gunman himself (because they often suicide by cop or use a gun to kill themselves to escape punishment), or police shootings of civilians around the gunman. The reasoning behind the latter being that if the shooter is arrested, he will often be charged with injuring people the police actually shot, as that is a foreseeable result of a shooting spree.
Besides the plain-reading value of tracking mass shootings this way, another benefit is that it removes medical care (which affects the outcome) from the action (shooting a bunch of people). The gun lobby benefits from our ability to save those who would otherwise die, even though those gun shot victims are still just as shot and will never be the same. The NRA evades the gigantic costs of gun injuries to society and shifts the burden to taxpayers who often pay the costs for the medical care of the wounded.
Maintaining a list like this also punches a hole in the NRA argument that if mass shootings are televised, more mass shootings will occur via copycats. In fact, many of these shootings do not receive more than a day's worth of local coverage. Yet mass shootings continue to occur anyway. We actually think mass shootings should receive more publicity, not less.
We refuse to ignore the victims of gun violence who survive mass shooting sprees, and we believe the media does a disservice to mass shooting victims by virtually ignoring them unless large numbers are killed.

Imagine this scenario:
[4 people are shot by a lone gunman who then kills himself. The victims are all alive at the moment.]
A reporter goes up to a victim who has been shot and asks "What's happened here?" The victim replies "There has been a mass shooting, that gun owner just shot four of us." The reporter replies "Sorry, that wasn't a mass shooting."
"But we still got shot. I'm bleeding from a bullet wound."
"But you didn't die. Even if you did die, the others might live. The media really hasn't properly labeled and tracked mass shootings, are we supposed to start with yours?"
"That would be nice. Where did you get your definition?"
"From a guy on the internet who read the definition of mass murder from a 2005 report on the FBI website."
"Oh. Well did you read it too?"
"No."
"Well I did. Here is how they define mass *murder*, and *not* mass shootings, these are direct quotes:

Old Definition:

  • "Generally, mass murder was described as a number of murders (four or more) occurring during the same incident, with no distinctive time period between the murders."

New Generally Accepted Definition:

  • "The general definition of spree murder is two or more murders committed by an offender or offenders, without a cooling-off period."
http://www.fbi.gov/stats-services/publications/serial-murder/serial-murder-1#two
Let's summarize and keep it simple by giving an accurate and precise definition of a mass shooting:
A mass shooting is when four or more people are shot in an event, or related series of events, likely without a cooling off period.
And guess what? Now we are giving you the tools to track it. So please report mass shootings accurately.

No comments:

Post a Comment