Sunday, March 19, 2017

Five Ninth Circuit Judges Issue Rare Dissent Rebuking The Panel In Immigration Ruling | JONATHAN TURLEY

Five Ninth Circuit Judges Issue Rare Dissent Rebuking The Panel In Immigration Ruling 

Five Ninth Circuit Judges Issue Rare Dissent Rebuking The Panel In Immigration Ruling


The judges said that the panel simply “brushed aside” the clearly controlling case law of Kleindienst v. Mandel, 408 U.S. 753 (1972). Indeed, the panel noted that the panel missed entirely the rulings in Kerry v. Din, 135 S. Ct. 2128 (2015) and Fiallo v. Bell, 430 U.S. 787 (1977).  In a statement that is particularly probative of the Hawaii ruling, the Supreme Court in Mandel recognized that first amendment rights were implicated by the executive action but found that “when the executive has exercised its authority to exclude aliens on the basis of a facially legitimate and bona fide reason, the courts will neither look behind the exercise of that discretion, nor test it by balancing its justification against the First Amendment 11 interests of those who seek personal communication with the applicant.”
Here is the opinion: 17-35105 en banc

No comments:

Post a Comment