Exposing America's Ballot Trafficking Cartel - Part I
True the Vote uncovered an organized criminal ballot trafficking ring that took advantage of Zuckerberg's drop boxes and Democrats flooding 37 million extra mail-in ballots into the 2020 election.
 |
All of my articles on True the Vote, 2000 Mules, and 2020 election fraud — Part I, Part II, Part III, Part IV, Part V, and Part VI.
“Votes cast by mail are less likely to be counted, more likely to be compromised and more likely to be contested than those cast in a voting booth, statistics show… Voting by mail is now common enough and problematic enough that election experts say there have been multiple elections in which no one can say with confidence which candidate was the deserved winner… Absentee ballots also make it much easier to buy and sell votes… all the evidence of stolen elections involves absentee ballots and the like.”
The above quote was compiled from a 2012 New York Times article entitled, “Error and Fraud at Issue as Absentee Voting Rises”. Before the 2020 election, there was a bipartisan consensus that voting by mail was more easily abused than in-person voting.
In a 2005 report signed by President Jimmy Carter and James A. Baker III, who served as secretary of state under the first President George Bush, the Commission on Federal Election Reform report stated, “Absentee ballots remain the largest source of potential voter fraud.”
Specifically, the report called on states to prohibit third parties or political operatives from collecting ballots—a practice commonly known as “ballot harvesting.”
“State and local jurisdictions should prohibit a person from handling absentee ballots other than the voter, an acknowledged family member, the U.S. Postal Service, or other legitimate shipper, or election officials,” the 2005 commission report said. “The practice in some states of allowing candidates or party workers to pick up and deliver absentee ballots should be eliminated.”
A Slate article stated in 2016, "the only voting fraud schemes with the potential to actually swing elections involved mail-in ballots… This makes sense: It’s much easier to forge a signature, impersonate a voter, or buy a vote in the privacy of one’s home than it is in a voting booth at the polls…If Republicans were truly serious about eradicating voter fraud, they would severely restrict absentee voting, permitting it only when voters have a good excuse, like illness."
In March 2020, as coronavirus lockdowns rolled out around the country, prominent Democrats such as Joe Biden, Hillary Clinton, Nancy Pelosi, and Barack Obama publicly called for a “vote-by-mail” election and “no-excuse absentee voting”.
On March 15, 2020, Joe Biden tweeted, “If you're exhibiting symptoms of COVID-19 — or might be at risk — absentee or vote by mail options are the best way to make your voice heard, while protecting your neighbors.”
On March 17, 2020, the Washington Post and the New York Times’ cited Democratic National Committee’s chairman, Tom Perez, in two articles that urged states to “adopt vote-by-mail” and “no-excuse absentee voting” due to the coronavirus outbreak.
On March 19, 2020, Hillary Clinton tweeted, “Every voter must have the opportunity to vote by mail this year.” That same day California became the first state to lockdown due to the coronavirus followed by New York a day later.
On March 21, 2020, Adam Schiff tweeted, “All states should allow no-excuse vote by mail. Starting right now.” By March 25, 2020, Illinois, Connecticut, Wisconsin, Michigan, New Mexico, Oregon, Washington, Vermont, Hawaii, and Massachusetts had all locked down as Democrats continued the push for a vote-by-mail election.
On April 3, 2020, Nancy Pelosi tweeted, “Vote-by-mail is essential to protecting the future of our democracy as we confront this public health crisis. There is no legitimate argument against enacting it."
By April 9, 2020, as Ilhan Omar tweeted, “We need vote by mail nationwide,” every state except Arkansas, Iowa, Nebraska, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, and Wyoming had already entered lockdowns.
A day later, Barack Obama tweeted, “Let’s not use the tragedy of a pandemic to compromise our democracy. Check the facts of vote by mail.” Obama’s tweet linked to an article by the New York Times entitled, “Does Vote-by-Mail Favor Democrats? No. It’s a False Argument by Trump.”
Although bipartisan consensus previously agreed that vote-by-mail leads to fraudulent elections, Democrats were able to increase the overall total of ballots cast by mail from 28.8 million in 2016 to 66.4 million in 2020, a whopping 131 percent increase.
Democrats simultaneously used the covid-19 crisis to push for nationwide mail-in voting, while altering election laws in 37 states to drop to mail-in ballot rejection rate by as much as 90% in key swing states.
Contrary to the New York Times article shared by former President Obama, Democrats did significantly benefit from the increase in vote-by-mail. The percentage of Democrats voting by mail rose from 26 percent in 2016 to 60 percent in 2020.
On the other hand, Republican voters only saw a rise from 21 percent to 32 percent. In other words, the extra 37.6 million ballots cast by mail during the 2020 election swung the election for Democrats.
But the question that remains is, how many of those mail-in ballots were illegal? A recent Rasmussen poll revealed that 59% of the country and 41% of Democrats believe that cheating was likely in the 2020 election.
This week surveillance footage emerged of an illegal ballot harvesting operation that took place during the 2020 election. True The Vote has spent the last year collecting more than 27 terabytes of geospatial and temporal data—a total of 10 trillion cell phone pings—between Oct. 1 and Nov. 6 in targeted areas in Georgia, Arizona, Michigan, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, and Texas.
The data includes geofenced points of interest like ballot drop box locations, as well as UPS stores and select government, commercial, and non-governmental organization (NGO) facilities.
The vote monitoring organization based out of Houston, Texas, was able to take cell phone ping data and piece together that over 2,000 people—suspected ballot harvesters—were making multiple trips to multiple drop boxes. From there, True The Vote gathered 24 terabytes of surveillance video on ballot drop boxes to match the cell phone data.
Conservative podcaster, Dinesh D'Souza, released a trailer on Saturday for a film entitled “2,000 Mules” in which True The Vote’s 27 terabytes of geospatial data and 24 terabytes of ballot drop box surveillance videos will be turned into a highly-produced documentary by the experienced filmmaker. The trailer shows video surveillance of suspected ballot harvesters wearing gloves and disguises dropping off stacks of ballots in drop boxes.
This comes days after VoterGA’s David Cross released a video of Gwinnett County drop box surveillance footage. In the video, you can clearly see a man snapping a photo of his hand filled with fanned-out ballots before placing all of the ballots in a drop box. Georgia law strictly prohibits third-party activists from picking up and delivering ballots on behalf of voters, a tactic called "ballot harvesting".
John Solomon of Just The News reported that illegal ballot harvesters were paid $10 per ballot after he interviewed a Georgia man who admitted he was paid thousands of dollars to harvest ballots in the Atlanta area. This ballot trafficker was just one of 242 alleged ballot traffickers who made a total of 5,662 trips to ballot boxes in Georgia according to the investigation by True the Vote.
The 2020 election was unlike previous elections with tech-billionaire Mark Zuckerberg effectively buying the election to create a two-tiered election system that disproportionately benefited Democrats. There has also never been an example of a coordinated illegal vote harvesting ring crossing over multiple states until the 2020 election.
The Center for Technology and Civic Life (CTCL) and The Center for Election Innovation and Research (CEIR) passed a staggering $419 million of Zuckerberg’s money into local government elections offices, and it came with strings attached.
In Michigan, $5,939,235 was awarded to jurisdictions where Clinton won and $402,878 where Trump won. In Pennsylvania, $13,063,828 where Clinton won and $692,742 where Trump won. In Georgia, CTCL’s grants benefited 9 of the 10 counties with the greatest vote shifts for Democrats.
In the Democrat leaning Philadelphia suburb of Delaware County, Zuckerberg’s funding helped provide 1 ballot drop box for every 4,000 voters, but in Pennsylvania’s known Republican counties, it was only 1 drop box for every 72,000 voters.
CTCL demanded the promotion of universal mail-in voting, extended deadlines that favored mail-in over in-person voting, staffed get-out-the-vote efforts, paid election officials, and ordered the consolidation of counting operations.
CTCL also drove the proliferation of ballot drop boxes which created the opportunity for this network of “2000 Mules” to illegally ballot harvest in the swing states that ultimately decided the outcome of the election.
Biden won 25 of the 26 cities and counties that received at least $1 million in Zuckerberg’s CTCL grants. These dollars didn’t flow indiscriminately to needy areas of the country but largely to government election offices in the biggest cities of swing states, where the majority of Democrat voters are concentrated.
At the very same time Zuckerberg worked to radically transform the 2020 election, he emailed Dr. Anthony Fauci on March 15, 2020, and said, “I also wanted to share a few ideas of ways we could help you get your message out".
That message was deleting anti-lockdown protest pages, blocking scientists and doctors from discussions of early treatment protocols, closing down schools, promoting mask mandates, and pushing for the nationwide lockdowns that would allow Zuckerberg’s CTCL to implement universal mail-in voting and ballot drop boxes.
While Zuckerberg and Democrats pushed for universal mail-in voting in 2020, most developed countries ban mail-in ballots unless the citizen is living abroad or require Photo-IDs to obtain those ballots. In Europe, 74 percent of nations ban mail-in ballots for citizens living inside their country and an additional 21 percent require photo voter IDs.
In Europe, there are only two countries that do not restrict mail-in ballots: Germany and Hungary, though unlike the United States people must prove their citizenship to register to vote. Brazil, Russia, Israel, Mexico and a host of additional developed nations have also banned mail-in voting completely.
There are still many unanswered questions about the True The Vote investigation. Like who paid the ballot harvesters and how far those payments can be followed up the chain? Will a corrupt and compromised FBI and DOJ even pursue the perpetrators? Will state legislatures take action against mail-in ballot fraud and ballot drop boxes? How many illegal ballots were harvested by these “2,000 Mules”?
The 2005 bipartisan report by the Commission on Federal Election Reform wrote, “Absentee ballots remain the largest source of potential voter fraud.” The New York Times wrote, "all the evidence of stolen elections involves absentee ballots". Slate wrote, "the only voting fraud schemes with the potential to actually swing elections involved mail-in ballots."
Will Dinesh D’Souza and True The Vote’s exposure of these “2,000 Mules” reveal a mail-in ballot voting fraud scheme that swung the 2020 election?
THE DOWNLOAD:
IRS Issued Subpoena To JPMorgan For Biden Family’s China Connections: A criminal IRS investigation into Hunter Biden — President Biden’s son — appears to have convened a grand jury as far back as May 2019, a confidential subpoena served to JPMorgan Chase bank reveals. This wide-ranging grand jury subpoena suggests that Joe’s son and brother received transfers from an account with the Bank of China. The document was obtained by Marco Polo a nonprofit research group “exposing corruption and blackmail,” and has been conducting a forensic review combined with an extra independent investigation into Hunter Biden’s laptop. Read more.
Sen. Ron Johnson And World-Renowned Doctors Lead Panel Discussion: “COVID-19: A Second Opinion.” A group of world-renowned doctors and medical experts provide a different perspective on the global pandemic response, the current state of knowledge of early and hospital treatment, vaccine efficacy and safety, what went right, what went wrong, what should be done now, and what needs to be addressed long term. Watch here.
Whistleblowers Share DOD Medical Data That Blows Vaccine Safety Narrative: Military medical whistleblowers have come forward with what they claim is perhaps the most accurate and revealing data set on vaccine safety one could possibly find. During Senator Ron Johnson’s hearing on a “COVID-19: Second Opinion,” attorney Thomas Renz presented DOD medical billing data from the Defense Medical Epidemiology Database (DMED) that paints a shockingly disturbing picture of the health of our service members in 2021. Read more.
No comments:
Post a Comment