Blake: ‘Bustang’ grazes on FASTER fees
By Peter Blake
Collapsing bridges! Giant tire-flattening, axle-busting potholes! Aren’t they the problems that the FASTER bill of 2009 was designed to solve?
They were, at least according to news coverage at the time. But the
Colorado Department of Transportation has found another way — legal but
wasteful — to spend some of the money.
Senate Bill 9-108
jacked up the “fees” (i.e. taxes not submitted to the public for
approval) on vehicle registration an average of $41 per year, increased
penalties for late registration payments and raised the state “fee” on
car rentals, among other things, in order to keep the transportation
infrastructure up to snuff. It was supposed to raise more than $200
million a year.
CDOT, nee the state highway department, historically has been
responsible for construction and maintenance of the infrastructure that
everyone else used to get around the state. But another 2009 bill authorized the creation of a transit and rail division within CDOT.
That bill said nothing about funding it. But buried deep in the 84
pages of dense boilerplate in the FASTER bill was a brief paragraph
authorizing “the investment of highway-derived user fee revenues for
multi-modal transportation projects.” A later amendment said such
projects should “promote mobility, reductions in emissions of greenhouse
gases, and energy efficiency.”
That apparently is politically correct, tarted-up newspeak for a
state-owned bus line. With that language, CDOT crossed the bright divide
between maintaining the infrastructure for the citizenry and using it
for its own purposes.
Both 2009 bills were pushed through by the Democratic majority over almost unanimous Republican opposition.
CDOT apparently is itching to become a statewide Regional Transportation District. That’s called mission creep.
The new program, given the snappy western name of “Bustang,” is
scheduled to start this spring with 13 new black and purple buses
costing $7.3 million, or $561,000 apiece. They have 50 seats and feature
restrooms, bike racks, free WiFi, power outlets and USB ports.
CDOT will not be operating the buses with its own employees. It has
hired Horizons Coach Lines, which will get about $2 million to $3
million a year to operate the buses. Cost-plus — the new risk-free
American capitalism.
CDOT describes Bustang as “Colorado‘s first-ever, state-owned and
operated bus system connecting major populations.” Since the state is
sponsoring the program, it is expected, perhaps obligated, to lose
money.
The routes, to run mainly during peak commuting times, connect Fort
Collins, Colorado Springs, Glenwood Springs and Vail with the
redeveloped Union Station complex in Denver.
Bustang will operate one round trip on weekdays along Interstate 70
between Glenwood Springs and Denver Union Station. There will be six
round-trips a day along I-25, between Colorado Springs and Union
Station, and five a day to and from Fort Collins. Buses will stop at
park-and-ride locations on the routes.
The fare will be $10 from Fort Collins, one way; $12 from Colorado
Springs; $28 from Glenwood Springs, and $17 from Vail. Discounts are
available for the handicapped, seniors over 65 and those who buy
multi-trip packages.
“I was kind of shocked they were doing that,” said Corey Watson, a
former cab driver who now runs Front Range Shuttle. He recalled that
there recently was another bus operation connecting Colorado Springs and
Denver. It was subsidized not by the state but by the city of Colorado
Springs, which somehow enjoys the reputation of being pro-free
enterprise even though it has a municipally owned utility and subsidizes
bus operations.
Front Range Express, or FREX, ran from 2004 to 2012, when new Springs
Mayor Steve Bach pulled the plug because it was losing so much money.
Some of its buses had to be sold at a large loss in 2010 to keep it
going the last two years.
It’s an odd time to start a state-subsidized transportation project.
It’s not as though there aren’t already bus or van lines serving those
communities. Greyhound is long past its prime but is still around.
Watson’s Front Range Shuttle runs vans between Colorado Springs and
Denver International Airport. SuperShuttle runs vans from Fort Collins
to DIA. Colorado Mountain Express, with 250 vehicles, offers service
between DIA and major ski areas like Aspen, Vail, Keystone and Copper
Mountain.
If there was a demand, and if there was a legal opportunity, these
companies or others could and would serve, at no cost to the taxpayers,
the routes that Bustang will be subsidized to handle.
It’s worth noting that local transportation is alleged to be swimming
in “too much” competition, with the taxi companies complaining about the
onslaught of Uber and Lyft. They are “transportation network companies”
that connect riders with limousines or private vehicles through
smartphone apps.
Intercity transport could be just as competitive if it were allowed to
be. There would be no need for the state itself to insert itself into
the business.
John Dawsey of Colorado Mountain Express said he isn’t too worried
about Bustang yet, since it is running only one round trip a day up his
way, at least at the start. Be also made this interesting point: Most
shuttles that run to Denver from out of town go to the airport because
that puts them under federal regulation. They are considered an
extension of flights from out of state and thus part of interstate
commerce.
The feds don’t regulate entry into the field. But if shuttles go to
Union Station they would fall under the PUC because they would be
intrastate. It’s much thornier getting PUC authorization.
Laws or rules should be liberalized to make sure private shuttle
services can serve places in Denver other than DIA without needing a PUC
say-so.
Meanwhile, the Bustang project is evidence that governments can’t help
raiding gas taxes and other automobile-based revenues for purposes not
related to highway maintenance. It happens in Washington too, with
Congress raiding federal gasoline tax revenues for mass transit and
other pet projects.
No comments:
Post a Comment