Play Video1:46
Why the world still uses coal
Coal
is one of the world’s largest sources of greenhouse gas emissions and a
major climate change contributor. So why are we still using it? For the
same reasons we always have: it’s cheap, plentiful, easy to transport
and easy to get. (Jorge Ribas and Julio Negron/The Washington Post)
“You
get more relaxed. You don’t want to push down too hard because that
will really drain your battery,” said Paul van den Hurk, an
electric-vehicle consultant who drives a Nissan Leaf, an electric car
with a range of about 85 miles. “You can listen to the music on your
stereo because you don’t hear the roar of your engine.”
In many
ways, the Netherlands could be an ideal home for electric cars: The
country is densely populated and smaller than West Virginia. The best
vehicles can now cross the nation on a single charge.
Tesla, the California-based manufacturer
of high-end electric cars, has made the Netherlands its European
beachhead, opening a new factory in the central city of Tilburg in
September, where vehicles are assembled for the company’s growing
European market.
For now, the plant is putting out 90 vehicles a
day, whose prices can run well over $100,000, but it could triple that
production rate. In a high-profile endorsement, 200 of the taxis that
serve Amsterdam’s airport are now Teslas, and the city wants to convert
its entire taxi fleet to electric within the next decade.
But for
all the efforts both locally and nationally, the Netherlands will blow
past its 2020 emissions targets, the result of the new coal-fired power
plants and delays in expanding wind power. Two of the new coal-fired
plants are in Rotterdam’s port, where their tall smokestacks belch
exhaust across the city.
“People
say we are Joe Windmill, but we missed the boat in developing wind
energy,” said Jacques de Jong, a former Dutch energy regulator who is
now a senior fellow at the Hague-based Clingendael International Energy
Program. Dutch authorities are scrambling to catch up, but they face
stiff resistance from local residents who dismiss the windmills as
unsightly.
Rotterdam’s grid operator says that it faces a
challenge with the increase in electric cars, even as it encourages
their use. Household electricity demand will rise as the vehicles
spread. The amount of electricity the vehicles will need will increase
by 50 percent by 2023, according to government projections, although it
is still just a fraction of the overall consumption of the country.
Electricity
generated from renewable sources is increasing in the Netherlands, but
with overall demand for electricity rising, the percentage of
coal-generated electricity is staying stubbornly high. Coal provided
29 percent of the country’s electricity last year, and it spiked even
higher this year. Dutch government forecasts expect coal to provide
about the same amount of electricity in 2030 as it did in 2014.
Amid
a surge in U.S. coal exports, the dirtiest fuel is so cheap that it is
upending European attempts to switch to cleaner sources of electricity.
“There
was a discussion going on to shut down the coal generators, and that’s
over. The coal price is too low,” said Marko Kruithof, the manager of
sustainability and innovation at Stedin, the grid operator for Rotterdam
and much of the region surrounding it.
In Rotterdam, Stedin has
helped build thousands of charging points for electric cars. A charge-up
for a Tesla costs about $20, and that gives it a 250-mile range. It’s
much cheaper than driving a gasoline-powered car.
Proponents
believe electric cars are on the verge of a breakthrough that would
significantly reduce their cost while extending their range. Chevrolet,
Nissan and other manufacturers say they will soon roll out cars that
could travel up to 200 miles on a single charge, the distance that many
analysts believe is necessary to broaden their appeal beyond a niche
market. Tesla, whose cars already exceed that range, plans in 2017 to
start producing a model aimed at the mass market that would cost
$35,000.
Benefits vary widely Advocates
think that because the vehicles store energy in their batteries, they
could one day play a useful role in smoothing out the surges in the grid
caused by the increased use of wind and solar energy, which provide
electricity only when the sun shines or the wind blows. But those clean-electricity sources will need to grow simultaneously for the climate impact to be positive.
“In
electric vehicles, you cannot decouple the car from the electricity
generation,” said Paul Nieuwenhuis, co-director of the Electric Vehicle
Center of Excellence at Cardiff University. “If we don’t manage the
demand, we would need to build more power stations to deal with it.”
In
the United States, where a natural gas boom has helped push down
emissions from the power sector, the potential climate benefits of
electric cars vary widely depending on the cleanliness of the
electricity mix.
In coal-fired Colorado, a gasoline car with fuel
economy better than 34 miles per gallon will be better for emissions
than the average electric car, according to
calculations from the Union of Concerned Scientists.
In hydropowered Upstate New York, in contrast, the same gas car would
need to achieve 112 miles per gallon. In the Washington region, the
figure stands between 60 and 63 miles per gallon.
On average in
the United States, at least in major markets, electric cars would offer
an improvement on carbon emissions, said Nic Lutsey, program director at
the International Council on Clean Transportation. “It seems that on
the whole, the carbon footprint will only get better,” he said, because
efforts to reduce greenhouse-gas production in electric power plants are
moving forward more rapidly than electric-car production.
But
environmentalists look at other regions with mixed feelings. The biggest
market in the world is China. Sales of electric cars nearly tripled
there between January and August compared with a year earlier, according
to the China Association of Automobile Manufacturers.
Chinese
leaders have embraced electric cars as a way of cleaning up cities that
have some of the worst air quality in the world. But the Chinese
electricity market is heavily dependent on coal; the pollution is simply
being taken from the centers of cities and moved to their outskirts.
Amid
the mixed picture for electric cars, some environmentalists say that
money spent on them might be better directed elsewhere.
“The
economics do not make sense to push more electric vehicles onto the
market” to improve the climate, said John DeCicco, a professor at the
University of Michigan Energy Institute. He said that attention might be
better focused on making conventional combustion engines more
efficient.
No comments:
Post a Comment