Obama Not A Citizen Thanks To His Own Mother
Attorney Orly Taitz vowed to shove everything she had concerning Barack Obama’s evidentiary problem at last week’s eligibility challenge in front of Indiana’s election board. Taitz, whose airline ticket to the hearing was purchased by a concerned citizen, presentedevidence of a “stolen social security number and a forgery instead of a birth certificate!”
She told WND reporter Bob Unruh that Indiana just removed their Secretary of State Charlie White for his discrepancies with voter registration irregularities over “minor” problems. Taitz said our sitting president’s eligibility problems are major in comparison.
But new questions about the status of BHO’s teen age mother Stanley Ann Dunham are surfacing as analysis at another web site is revealing a Congressional rule change for people born between December 23, 1952 and November 13, 1986 puts in serious doubt Stanley Ann Dunham’s ability to confer citizenship status on her son.
Since Barack Hussein Obama, Jr. was born in 1961, this newly discovered law involves Dunham’s age because she was only 18 at time of delivery! The law says:
”When one parent was a U.S. citizen and the other a foreign national, the U.S. citizen parent must have resided in the U.S. for a total of 10 years prior to birth of the child with FIVE of the years after the age of 14.” Stanley Ann Dunham did not meet requisite status according to blog discovery. One commenter said, “She was not old enough to register Obama’s birth in Hawaii or anywhere else in the U.S. as a Natural Born Citizen as she did not meet the residency requirements! Backing this statement up, another commenter reiterates:” The law specifically outlines the requirements for a CITIZEN mother to confer citizenship to her baby. Ann Dunham was NOT old enough-case closed!”
Judge Malihi in his pg. 6 footnote went back 20 years to cite Jill Pryor’s statement to the Yale Law Journal in which she said: “Despite its apparent simplicity, the Natural Born Citizen clause of the Constitution has never been completely understood.” Pryor goes on to begin her next sentence with the nonsensical anonymous pronoun IT: “It is well settled that Native Born citizens, those born in the U.S., qualify as natural born.”
Huh? Who is “It” Judge?
The WND analysis found the state Supreme Court of North Dakota over seventy years ago threw out of office a governor because his “lack of residential qualifications is a legal disability!” You can view the C-Span video of U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas telling Puerto Rican Representative Jose Serrno: “We’re evading that one!” when his questioner asked about the NBC clause. So a new angle enters the Obama NBC protest. While state and federal officialdom keeps ignoring American citizens, Attorney Orly Taitz, who was born in the USSR and who fears her beloved naturalized country is heading toward the fate of Germany, is keeping the controversy up on court dockets. If she and her other appeals colleagues get rebuffed on the birth father’s NBC issue, maybe they can start in on a new round of hearings using the birth mother’s status. They just won’t have President Obama’s own words telling them his father was NOT a U.S. citizen!
Alert: Sheriff Joe Arpaio is releasing the results of his investigation into Barack Obama’s Eligibility. Go to this link to see the video.
Re: "”When one parent was a U.S. citizen and the other a foreign national, the U.S. citizen parent must have resided in the U.S. for a total of 10 years prior to birth of the child with FIVE of..."
ReplyDeleteThat law applies ONLY to births outside of the USA. When a child is born in the USA, the mother can be any age, and the father can be any age, and both of them can be any age because it is the place of birth that makes you (1) a citizen, and (2) a Natural Born Citizen.
Obama was born in Hawaii has has been proven overwhelmingly. There are his short form and long form birth certificates, the facts on which were confirmed repeatedly by THREE Republican officials and several Democrat officials in Hawaii. And there are the birth notices in the papers in Hawaii, and there even is a witness who wrote home about the birth (to her father, named Stanley) about the unusual event of a child being born to a woman named Stanley that day).
“Under the longstanding English common-law principle of jus soli, persons born within the territory of the sovereign (other than children of enemy aliens or foreign diplomats) are citizens from birth. Thus, those persons born within the United States are "natural born citizens" and eligible to be President...."---- Edwin Meese, et al, THE HERITAGE GUIDE TO THE CONSTITUTION (2005) [Edwin Meese was Ronald Reagan’s attorney general, and the Heritage Foundation is a well-known Conservative organization.]
“What is a natural born citizen? Clearly, someone born within the United States or one of its territories is a natural born citizen.” (Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on OCTOBER 5, 2004)--Senator Orrin G. Hatch (R-UT).
AnonymousMarch 5, 2012 at 9:12 AM - I don't know if this will post and/or if you will read - - The rules changed again for people born between December 23, 1952, and November 13, 1986. When one parent was a U.S. citizen and the other a foreign national, the U.S. citizen parent must have resided in the U.S. for a total of 10 years prior to the birth of the child, with five of the years after the age of 14. Children born out of wedlock to a U.S. citizen mother were U.S. citizens if the mother was a resident in the U.S. for a period of one year prior to the birth of the child. Children born out of wedlock to a U.S. citizen father acquired U.S. citizenship only if legitimated before turning 21.
Deletehttp://www.ranchodlaw.com/other-visas/citizenship-and-residency/
SO - one would need to look at both scenarios - IMO there still hasn't been proof that Stanley Ann and "Obama Sr" were married - therefore - due to the 'out-of-wedlock' rule - Obama would have been eligible - -
Re: "U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas telling Puerto Rican Representative Jose Serrno: “We’re evading that one!” when his questioner asked about the NBC clause..."
ReplyDeleteSerrno was asking whether a person born in Puerto Rico was a Natural Born Citizen. That is a more complicated issue than birth in a US state, which Hawaii is. Puerto Rico is a territory, and it is also an "unincorporated territory"--which makes it different.
But there is no question that everyone born in a US state (and for that matter in the District of Columbia, as Gore was) is a Natural Born US Citizen. And Obama was born in Hawaii, as has been proven overwhelmingly.