If The Obamacare Mandate Is A Penalty, Then Where Is Our Due Process?
Jul 11, 2012
12:26pm
12:26pm
But if the mandate is a penalty punishing us by depriving us of some property (money) because we do not have health insurance, then aren’t we to be afforded due process in the courts? That’s a question California Rep. Tom McClintock is asking:
“If the government fines you $250 for running a red light, or it taxes you $250 for running a red light, the effect is the same. What’s the difference? There are two critical differences.”Maybe it’s time for Democrats to admit that Obamacare represents a tax on people without health insurance.
“First, as a fine – as a penalty – the burden of proof is on the government to prove that you ran that red light. As a tax, the burden of proof is on you to prove that you did not run it. Anyone who has ever undergone an IRS audit knows exactly what I mean. This decision fundamentally alters the most cherished principle of our justice system: the presumption of innocence.”
“There is a second, even more chilling difference between a penalty and a tax. Under our Constitution, no penalty can be assessed without due process – you cannot be punished until you have had your day in court. But to challenge a tax, you must pay first pay that tax before you can seek redress through the court. You are punished first, and then tried. “
“This is the madness of Lewis Carroll’s Red Queen brought to life: “Sentence first – verdict afterwards.”
No comments:
Post a Comment