Because man-made climate change is at the center of liberals’ and environmentalists’ entire political ideology, it’s essential that the idea be considered fact.
Even if it’s not.
SO when numbers come in from weather stations around the country that either disprove the entire notion of “global warming” or “climate change,” something needs to be done.
So what’s done? They change the numbers. Easy-peasy. Researcher John Goetz analyzes the difference between the “raw” measurements recorded by weather stations and the “official” ones that end up in the record books. And he noticed something interesting. They change:
Goetz finds that approximately 92% (or even more, depending on how you calculate it) of US surface temperature data consists of estimated or altered values. Very little raw data finds its way into the warmists’ climate models–which, of course, is the way they want it. Second, the adjustments that are made to the U.S. data consistently skew the numbers as we have described many times before–they try to make the present look warmer, compared with the past.
Why would they do this? There’s a lot of money in climate change and if these alarmists can’t prove the planet’s warming up and it’s OUR fault, the money dries up. Here’s what the average temperature at various weather stations in the United States looks like for the last ten years. See any warming? No? Shhh…
No comments:
Post a Comment