The ObamaCare Dozen
The Democrats who voted for the debacle are now scrambling for cover.
Updated Nov. 11, 2013 6:54 p.m. ET
The torrents of Affordable Care Act
monsoon season aren't letting up, so Democrats are scrambling to help
the victims: namely, their own careers. The Senators up for re-election
in competitive states in 2014 are starting to panic, though they still
aren't offering solutions for anything other than their own growing
political jeopardy.
Fifteen Senate
Democrats plus Colorado's
Michael Bennet
who chairs the Senatorial Campaign Committee sat down at the
White House Wednesday, and they want all and sundry to know that they
let President
Obama
have it. Alaska's Mark Begich put out a statement saying he
chewed out the big cheese for "absolutely unacceptable" mismanagement
and "an understandable crisis in confidence." He must have drafted it in
advance.
Oregon's
Jeff Merkley
chimed in to report that even after the two-hour encounter
session that was not on the public schedule, he was still "very
frustrated" and "I remain deeply convinced that this is a 'show-me'
moment." Asked by Politico if Democrats were losing credibility, an
anonymous attendee said, "You got to have it, to lose it."
Mr. Obama held their hands and told them not to worry. But that's also what he,
Bill Clinton
and other horse whisperers said in 2010. The "moderates" who made the
Nancy Pelosi
majority went on to be wiped out in the largest turnover of House seats since 1938.
Mr.
Obama then comforted the party regulars that all would be well once the
exchanges launched. That day arrived, sort of, since the website
doesn't work. He's now urging Democrats to keep calm because the public
will love it once the subsidies start to roll out. Yet insurance is
being cancelled, premiums are surging and patients like
Edie Sundby
can't keep their doctors.
Meanwhile,
the Salesman in Chief has been exposed for his fraudulent promises.
Before October Mr. Obama's rhetoric seemed desperate like Shelly Levene
in "Glengarry Glen Ross," repeating discredited assurances that few
believed. Now it seems somewhat sinister as he tries to falsify his
history of false claims.
All of which has the ObamaCare
Dozen—the Democrats who each cast the decisive 60th vote and are
running for re-election in 2014—fleeing for political cover. We offer a
list of the dozen nearby, and they're right to worry that voters might
punish ObamaCare's implementation as they did its passage. But so far
the 12 are trying to pull off nothing more than confidence tricks.
New
Hampshire's
Jeanne Shaheen
is leading a coalition asking for an unspecified extension of
ObamaCare's March 15 enrollment deadline.
Mr. Begich
(Alaska),
Mark Pryor
(Arkansas) and
Mark Udall
(Colorado) are among those on this bus, though Ms. Shaheen has
special cause for alarm given that New Hampshire's joint state-federal
exchange enlisted only a single insurer, whose narrow network excludes
10 of the state's 26 acute-care hospitals.
But
her idea would merely draw out the technical agony, and the exchange
premiums are based on assumptions of a full year of coverage. Premiums
may not cover claims if people delay or forgo signing up in 2014, and
then rates will spike the next year. All of this would also give the
exchanges a stigma as untrustworthy, more so than even Health and Human
Services incompetence.
The Shaheen plan also won't
un-terminate insurance or help the people who face a gap in coverage
through no fault of their own. Louisiana's
Mary Landrieu
is hoping to cauterize that crisis with a bill that supposedly
allows people to keep their plan if they stay current on premiums. About
80,000 Louisiana policy holders—or half of the individual market—will
be dumped in 2014, according to the state's insurance commissioner.
Here
again, complex insurance contracts take months to plan financially and
negotiate with providers. They could be renewed for maybe a few months
but not forever, which is why the Landrieu bill is simply a new mandate
ordering insurers to continue offering these plans. But the hard
business truth is that these plans are already gone. The only way to
solve the problem is a time machine to go back to 2010 when HHS
published its deliberately restrictive rule on "grandfathering."
The Shaheen and Landrieu proposals are merely ploys for these Democrats to distance themselves from ObamaCare
while still embracing it. But they can't have it both ways. Either they
can vote to take down the whole regulate-subsidize-mandate apparatus
for a year and propose major reforms to prevent a reprise of the last
six weeks. Or else they will be enablers of the current and future
disruptions, cancellations and limited health choices.
No
doubt the ObamaCare Dozen noticed the Virginia Governor's race, which
revealed that even presumably safe Democrats could be vulnerable on
health care if Republicans can field decent candidates. As flawed and
out-fundraised as GOP candidate Ken Cuccinelli was, he closed a huge gap
in the polls by relentlessly belting ObamaCare in the final stretch.
Exit polls report that only 46% of the Virginia public supports ObamaCare, while 53% were opposed, 41% strongly opposed.
Mr. Cuccinelli
pulled 89% of those opposed. In 2014, Mr. Udall, Mr. Merkley and Virginia's
Mark Warner
might not be as fortunate as
Terry McAuliffe.
***
The ObamaCare Dozen
are receiving an overdue education in the damaging consequences of the
bill they supported, all of which were predicted by critics in 2010. Any
one of these Senators could have prevented the current madness by
voting no. And now the President they empowered to govern from the
ideological left has rejected even their de minimis fixes and is
promising to "grind it out" even if the problems get worse. These
Senators deserve to be held accountable at the ballot box.
No comments:
Post a Comment