Sunday, March 17, 2013

difficult to see the logic

difficult to see the logic
 
You know, it is difficult to see the logic of how anyone that is not "with the government and here to help" could think it is a good idea for us to be disarmed, or even accept any partial bans or gun registration.

1) Gun registration is a prelude to confiscation, they have to know who has them before they ban them.

2) Bans of certain type weapons is just the first step and, in most cases, followed by more till they are gone.

3) If the government feels the need to disarm us, then we should be very leery about what that governments intentions are.

4) Criminals are still going to have guns. Felons already possess them illegally, so how is any law going to effect them.

5) Violent crimes, rapes, etc skyrocket after guns are banned.

6) You may get a decrease in murders with guns, but those include suicides (they will find another way) and also death by law enforcement. If the murder rate with guns goes down, others will increase.

7) Lets face it, we have our government breathing down our necks like a psychotic stalker from hell with some deep seated mental issues. The things I hear them say, and the points they make on TV make no sense at all. It is like the twilight zone. Bring up a debate on gun control to Biden or Feinstein and they start acting like that Rosen guy and sputtering about "What they saw" " can't reveal it it was so bad" blah, blah, blah. If they can't validly argue their point, then why are they trying to make it? Wow, I started rambling. Anyway, my point was if we are disarmed, they are jumping into super tyranny mode, quickly.

8) The ugly side of gun bans are that more than a few have led to governmental genocide on it's citizens. How they can do this is beyond me, but they built FEMA camps and armed DHS for a reason, so overlooking it is pure cognitive dissonance.

9) If they do a partial ban or registration, then they still need to do another false flag to get the public on their side for a full ban. Which getting public on their side means they government controlled media acts like it is.

10) I can't think of a single good reason to support bans or registration, and a lot of bad ones. The worst ones are so bad that no one in their right mind should ever consider leaving themselves defenseless.

The people don't even support it, and agree we need guns for protection from tyranny.

The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that 65% of American Adults think the purpose of the Second Amendment is to make sure that people are able to protect themselves from tyranny. Only 17% disagree, while another 18% are not sure.

How in the world can Feinstein get re-elected if the whole voting process is not a sham. Just seeing her is revolting and the lying she does is pathetic to say the least. So, if we have any gun grabbers left on the page, how can someone think of it as a good idea for us to disarm when we have, quite possibly, the most evil government in the history of the world in power?

No comments:

Post a Comment