Profiling - A Darwinian Necessity
No,
not all snakes are poisonous. But if you see a snake move in the grass
you better presume it might be poisonous and back off.
Now
maybe it was just a King snake. But unless you know for sure you
better presume it might be poisonous. Of course the inference that this
snake is poisonous because some snakes are poisonous is fallacious. But
is that what is going on profiling? The inference is that it might be.
And it is the 'might' that is the weasel factor. The degree of
probability is all important as is the degree of danger. The profiling
that is involved here is a kind of generalization: objects with
characteristics XYX are presumed, to a certain degree of probability, to
also have characteristics UVW. The presumption is based on what we know
or think we know about the probability relationship.
Walter Williams, the noted economist and political analyst, characterizes
profiling as follows, "We can think of profiling as a method to
economize on information costs by using easily observed physical
characteristics as a proxy or a guess for some other characteristic more
difficult or costlier to observe."
Of
course we can be done in by our profile invocations. After all, if you
were standing next to Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, while watching the Boston Marathon, you would probably profile him as not being dangerous since he seems well mannered and to fit in with the rest of the crowd.
In
order to get things done in a reasonably timely manner we need to make
snap decisions based on invoking what we consider to be the appropriate
profile of the situation. If I am walking
into Kroger out of the parking lot and a car slows down for me [XYZ], I
invoke the profile of a considerate driver [UVW] who will let me pass.
If I am turning left onto a highway and see a car coming from the left
with it's right blinker on and seemingly slowing down, I start
to pull out onto the highway if all else is clear. I have invoked the
profile of competent driver who is giving me indication of his future
actions.
We make thousands of such decisions every day. We don't have time to check
out our presumptions. From a survival point of view it is better to err
on the side of caution but even then, given time concerns, we
continually take our chances. We have to profile. There is no need to
council us to live dangerously, we have no alternative.
With
the car example, as indicated, I have, in effect, invoked the profile
of a competent driver who is aware that his right blinker is on,
presumed that the driver is not deliberately out to deceive me, that his
car is functioning properly, that my car won't stall ... .
Holding
on to one's profile of what to expect in an assessment of a given
situation, which involves a host of presumptions about associated
characteristics, in the face of increasing evidence that such
associations are relatively mistaken, is irrational and possibly fatal.
But making the initial decision in time critical situations is a
Darwinian necessity.
If
one is constantly being judged as probably having characteristics UVW
because of having characteristics XYZ when in fact one does not, then
one has a right to be irritated. But such is life. Dumb blonds? "Creepy
assed crackers"? Not only may one be the exception to the general rule,
the general rule invoked may be cockeyed. Certainly racial or ethnic
profiling may be statistically wrong, as can any other profiling. But we
all make snap decisions on the basis of what we know or think we know
about associated characteristics, however unfair that may be in any
individual case. Till we have perfect knowledge that means that Obama's black-man-in-the-elevator is going to hear the snap [sic] of your purse.
As Walter Williams concludes his article
on the practical necessity of profiling, "God, unlike us mortals,
wouldn't have to do any kind of profiling, because he knows everything.
We mortals, with our imperfections, must find substitutes for his
omniscience."
Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2013/07/profiling_-_a_darwinian_necessity.html#ixzz2aAQzlR4J
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook
No comments:
Post a Comment