ICD 9: International Medical Coding and “Legal” Execution Brought Under Obamacare
A faithful reader sent me
a code and asked me to investigate how it ties into the larger scale of things.
The specific code sent to me will make any American’s hair stand up on the back
of their neck. The code is ICD 9 E 978. After reading this code I decided that
it was my duty to investigate further and get to the bottom of why we have a
medical code in the United States for “Legal Execution.” Below are my results.
ICD 9
E 978 “Legal Execution
All executions performed at the behest of the judiciary or ruling authority [whether permanent or temporary] as:
All executions performed at the behest of the judiciary or ruling authority [whether permanent or temporary] as:
·
asphyxiation by gas
·
beheading, decapitation (by
guillotine)
·
capital punishment
·
electrocution
·
hanging
·
poisoning
·
shooting
·
other specified means
·
INJURY UNDETERMINED WHETHER
ACCIDENTALLY OR PURPOSELY
·
INFLICTED
According
to reports, more than 68,105 new medical codes are being added due to the
Obamacare monstrosity. Doctors all across the nation have been complaining due
to the overwhelming burden it places upon them. Just the time consumption
alone, making sure these codes are accurate, will inevitably take time away
from the doctor/patient relationship creating a barrier of paperwork while
destroying the personal experience with your doctor. While these doctors are
correct to state it will be even more of a burden, they are not correct to
state this has come out of Obamacare itself. Let me explain.
These codes were not
created by Obamacare, however Obamacare is trying to implement every American
citizen under international codes to link us to the “international” system.
These codes were actually created by the WHO (World Health Organization) . The
WHO is a specialized agency of the United Nations.
First, it is important to
know what the meanings of the codes are to grasp a better understanding of the
importance and depth of this “internal takeover” that has been going on for
many years right under our noses. The first ICD (International
Classification of Diseases) was created in 1893.
- WHO took control of clinical modifications in 1948.
- 1955 the WHO modified the ICD to track mortality rates.
- 1977 the 9th revision was published aka “ICD 9 Medical Codes” that are being used today within our medical system.
- 1988 Congress passed “Medicare Catastrophic Coverage Act” requiring the use of ICD 9 codes on all claims.
- 1996 Mandated codes to be of highest possible specificity.
As
of October 1, 2014 the ICD 9 coding will no longer be used. ICD 10 “mandated”
medical coding will add 68,105 codes. The ICD-10-PCS (Procedure Code System)
has an additional 86,000 codes totaling approximately 155,000 new medical codes
for medical professionals. I can see why this would be overwhelming, and I am
sure this will be a burden on doctors. One does have to wonder why doctors have
not spoken out against this international coding system in the first place.
This “international” United Nations based code is used to track people in all
countries that have signed on with the WHO plan. Their “coding” and “data”
collections have been implemented all around the globe with a few exceptions.
So why are American doctors being required to use international medical coding?
Why haven’t doctors pointed out these are international codes? Why did congress
sell out the American people in 1988 by passing the “Medicare Catastrophic
Coverage Act” going along with and forcing “Sovereign United States Citizens”
under “International rules, regulations, and coding”?
According to Wikipedia
The World Health Organization (WHO) is a specialized agency
of the United Nations (UN) that is concerned with international public health.
It was established on 7 April 1948, with its headquarters in Geneva,
Switzerland. WHO is a member of the United
Nations Development Group. Its predecessor, the Health
Organization, was an agency of the League of Nations.
The use of the word “world”, rather than “international”,
emphasized the truly global nature of what the organization was seeking to
achieve. The constitution of the World Health Organization had been signed by
all 61 countries of the United Nations by 22 July 1946. It thus became the
first specialized agency of the United Nations to which every member
subscribed. Its constitution formally came into force on the first World Health
Day on 7 April 1948, when it was ratified by the 26th member state. The first
meeting of the World Health Assembly finished on 24 July 1948, having secured a
budget of US$5 million (then GBP£1,250,000) for the 1949 year.
Andrija Stampar was the Assembly’s first president, and G.
Brock Chisholm was appointed Director-General of WHO, having served as
Executive Secretary during the planning stages. Its first priorities were to
control the spread of malaria, tuberculosis and sexually transmitted
infections, and to improve maternal and child health, nutrition and
environmental hygiene. Its first legislative act was concerning the compilation
of accurate statistics on the spread and morbidity of disease. The logo of the
World Health Organization features the Rod of Aesculapius as a symbol for
healing.
The WHO and the World Bank constitute the core team
responsible for administering the International Health Partnership (IHP+). The
IHP+ is a group of partner governments, development agencies, civil society and
others committed to improving the health of citizens in developing countries.
Partners work together to put international principles for aid effectiveness
and development cooperation into practice in the health sector.
In addition, the WHO has also promoted road safety. Each
year, the organization marks World Health Day focusing on a specific health
promotion topic, timed to match the anniversary of WHO’s founding. Recent
themes have been drug resistance (2011) and aging (2012). As part of the United
Nations, the World Health Organization supports work towards the Millennium
Development Goals. Of the eight Millennium Development Goals, three –
reducing child mortality by two-thirds, to reduce maternal deaths by
three-quarters, and to halt and begin to reduce the spread of HIV/AIDS – relate
directly to WHO’s scope; the other five inter-relate and have an impact on
world health.
The organization develops and promotes the use of evidence-based
tools, norms and standards to support member states to inform health policy
options. It oversees the implementation of the International Health
Regulations, and publishes a series of medical classifications; of these, three
are overreaching “reference classifications”: the International Statistical
Classification of Diseases (ICD), the International Classification of
Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) and the International Classification
of Health Interventions (ICHI). Other international policy frameworks produced
by WHO include the International Code of Marketing of Breast-milk Substitutes
(adopted in 1981), Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (adopted in 2003)
and the Global Code of Practice on the International Recruitment of Health
Personnel (adopted in 2010).
The WHO regularly publishes a World Health Report, its
leading publication, including an expert assessment of a specific global health
topic. Other publications of WHO include the Bulletin of the World Health
Organization, the Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal (overseen by EMRO), the
Human Resources for Health (published in collaboration with BioMed Central),
and the Pan American Journal of Public Health (overseen by PAHO/AMRO).
As of 2013, the WHO has 194 member states: all Member
States of the United Nations except Liechtenstein, as well as the Cook Islands
and Niue. (A state becomes a full member of WHO by ratifying the treaty known
as the Constitution of the World Health Organization.)
As of 2013, it also had two associate members, Puerto Rico
and Tokelau. Several other entities have been granted observer status.
Palestine is an observer as a “national liberation movement” recognized by the
League of Arab States under United Nations Resolution 3118. The Holy See also attends
as an observer, as does the Order of Malta. In 2010, Taiwan was invited under
the name of “Chinese Taipei”.
WHO Member States appoint delegations to the World Health
Assembly, WHO’s supreme decision-making body. All UN Member States are eligible
for WHO membership, and, according to the WHO web site, “other countries may be
admitted as members when their application has been approved by a simple
majority vote of the World Health Assembly”. In addition, the UN observer
organizations International Committee of the Red Cross and International
Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies have entered into “official
relations” with WHO and are invited as observers. In the World Health Assembly
they are seated along the Financing and partnerships.
The WHO is financed by contributions from member states and
outside donors. As of 2012, the largest annual assessed contributions from
member states came from the United States ($110 million), Japan ($58 million),
Germany ($37 million), United Kingdom ($31 million) and France ($31 million).
The combined 2012–2013 budget has proposed a total expenditure of $3,959
million, of which $944 million (24%) will come from assessed contributions.
This represented a significant fall in outlay compared to the previous 2009–2010
budget, adjusting to take account of previous under spends. Assessed
contributions were kept the same. Voluntary contributions will account for
$3,015 million (76%), of which $800 million is regarded as highly or moderately
flexible funding, with the remainder tied to particular programs or objectives.
In
recent years, the WHO’s work has involved increasing collaboration with
external bodies. As of 2002, a total of 473 NGOs had some form of partnership
with WHO. There were 189 partnerships with international non-governmental
organization (NGO) in formal “official relations” – the rest being considered
informal in character. Partners include the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
and the Rockefeller Foundation.
As you can see the WHO
supports UN Agenda 21 through the “Millennium Development Goals” “Sustainable
Development” agendas. President Obama, as senator, had a hand in attempting to
increase U.S. political attention towards Millennium Development Goals,
including The Borgen Project which worked with Senator Obama on “The Global Poverty Act”;
a bill requiring the White House to develop a strategy for achieving the goals.
The bill did not pass.
Even more disturbing, is
finding out American citizens have been subject to the ICP Medial code for many
years. Thus, giving the United Nations our private information through
“coding.” This is not only is an invasion of our privacy, but has been done in
silence without our knowledge.
The Department
of Homeland Security of Wisconsin “List of underlying causes of injury
death Framework of E-code groupings (ICD-9) 1989 – 1998″ conveniently leaves
out the definition of code ICD 9 E 978, but does reference it at the bottom of
the list as: “1. Includes legal intervention (E970-E978) and operations
of war
(E990-E999).”
This certainly makes me
wonder why DHS would omit (“hide”) the code from the chart? Most people won’t
dig to find out what the “medical code” means unless they have a specific
reason to do so. One thing is for sure, whether omitted by DHS or someone else,
there is a good reason this code was left out of their document. They
definitely didn’t want most people to see what it means. DHS knows this code
would create a stir with the American people if they found out there was a code
for “Legal Execution,” especially with a guillotine and beheading.
ICD9Data.com
also gives a list for “legal intervention.” Center for Disease Control
“International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10)”
To read more about the
“global” coding ICD 9 and 10 see below:
2013 ARHPC_ICD 9 CM
2013 ARHPC_ICD 9 CM
The questions that need
to be asked and answered are:
1. Why has the United States been subjected to “International
Medical Coding” without our knowledge?
2. Why are we allowing “coding” that goes against our
principles and constitution?
3. Why do we have a code for “Legal Execution” which is
illegal in America? With the exception of those given the death penalty after
trial by jury.
4. When did the Department of Homeland Security find out about
this coding? Why haven’t they addressed this (since they are supposed to
protect the people)?
5. Why is DHS sending any kind of “Medical Coding” to the
states?
6. Why haven’t the doctors spoken out to make Americans and
Medicare recipients aware that their information has been given to an
“International body”?
7. Why haven’t they made people aware that the WHO is a
specialized agency of the United Nations and directly linked to the “League of
Nations under the guise of collecting data?
8. Why would we allow forced medical coding through
congressional bills to come from an organization that supports UN Agenda 21,
Millennium Development Goals, and supports the eradication of “sprawl” (which
is average people like you and I)?
9. Is law enforcement aware of this specific code? If so why
haven’t they brought this to the attention of the American people?
I, of course, do not know
the answers to these questions, but I am deeply disturbed that we, the American
People, have been kept in the dark on such an important issue. I was never
asked permission for an international organization being able to access any of
my information through “coding.” I’ll bet you were not asked either. It is bad
enough the out of control IRS will have complete access to our health
information. Now, to make matters even worse, we find out the WHO will have
access to every American citizens health information through “medical coding,”
via Obamacare. When will enough be enough? When will the United States wake up
and refuse to continue funding the United Nations and any organization that is
affiliated with it?
One thing is for sure.
This coding is directly related and tied to creating their “International One
World Government.” While the WHO pretends to be for helping people, they create
codes for “Legal Execution” by beheading. The more you research, the more you
realize that the WHO isn’t all roses and sunshine. There is a much darker
agenda at play. There is a direct connection between the “elitist” global banks
and the WHO. The deeper you research, the more disturbing it gets. While
American citizens have trusted our government to spend our money wisely, they
have paid the WHO approximately $110 million dollars this year alone. Our
government is inching us closer and closer to being controlled by a “One World
Government” system and forcing us to pay for it. The repeal of Obamacare is
important to our nation for many reasons, but pulling out of the United Nations
and completely defunding them is imperative to our survival as a sovereign
country and a free people.
Contact your
representatives and demand that we defund and pull out of the United Nations
now. Let them know about the “International Coding” system that is in place. I
am sure many are not aware of this as they normally don’t even read the bills
before they pass them ref: Obamacare aka ACA. If they won’t read their own
bills why would we expect them to understand or know that the new medical
coding is an expansion of a International Medical Code designed to track the
world? This must be stopped. I am not and never have been a “global citizen”! I
am an AMERICAN citizen! I am Red, White, and Blue through and through, and will
continue to fight for our country, exposing corruption and spreading truth as
long as I live.
No comments:
Post a Comment