Congressman Explains Why He Bailed On SOTU Address
January 29, 2014 by B. Christopher Agee Leave
a Comment
For millions of patriots,
Barack Obama’s State of the Union address Tuesday night was yet another
frustrating reminder that he views Congress as an obstacle to be avoided in his
pursuit of a leftist utopia. He repeatedly expressed his desire to act
unilaterally in imposing his will on the American people – even as he directly
addressed the legislators he promised to bypass in the process.
“I could not bear to
watch as he continued to cross the clearly-defined boundaries of the
Constitutional separation of powers,” he explained, adding he was “deeply
disappointed in the tone and content” of the speech.
Stockman, a proven
conservative with strong Tea Party support, did not mince words when he accused
Obama of “abusing his Constitutional powers,” breaking his presidential oath,
and “enacting his own brand of law through executive decree.”
The congressman’s remarks
reflected those of many of his colleagues – not to mention millions of
Americans outraged over Obama’s continual power grab.
Idaho Republican Rep.
Raul Labrador, for example, issued a statement blasting the speech for its
“hostility toward our foundational principles, condescension toward a co-equal
branch of government, and a general aversion to common sense and
bipartisanship.”
“This is a wholesale
violation of his oath of office and a disqualifying offense,” he added,
suggesting the speech should have included Obama’s admission that “his policies
have failed.”
Stockman, who is hoping
to oust Republican Sen. John Cornyn in the upcoming election, is often
outspoken in his criticism of Obama and leftism in general. Sometimes, as
evidenced by his early departure from Tuesday’s speech, actions truly do speak
louder than words.
Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/congressman-explains-bailed-sotu-address/#FxzpGBapkjJ66oCx.99
Congressman Explains Why He Bailed On SOTU Address
January 29, 2014 by Leave a Comment
For millions of patriots, Barack Obama’s State of the Union address
Tuesday night was yet another frustrating reminder that he views
Congress as an obstacle to be avoided in his pursuit of a leftist
utopia. He repeatedly expressed his desire to act unilaterally in
imposing his will on the American people – even as he directly addressed
the legislators he promised to bypass in the process.
One of those lawmakers, Texas Republican Rep. Steve Stockman, apparently had enough of his imperial rhetoric and actually excused himself before the speech was complete.
“I could not bear to watch as he continued to cross the clearly-defined boundaries of the Constitutional separation of powers,” he explained, adding he was “deeply disappointed in the tone and content” of the speech.
Stockman, a proven conservative with strong Tea Party support, did not mince words when he accused Obama of “abusing his Constitutional powers,” breaking his presidential oath, and “enacting his own brand of law through executive decree.”
The congressman’s remarks reflected those of many of his colleagues – not to mention millions of Americans outraged over Obama’s continual power grab.
Idaho Republican Rep. Raul Labrador, for example, issued a statement blasting the speech for its “hostility toward our foundational principles, condescension toward a co-equal branch of government, and a general aversion to common sense and bipartisanship.”
By walking out on the annual event, however, Stockman was able to
bring attention to the tyrannical policies Obama endorsed in the
address. He then capitalized on that publicity by lambasting both the
speech and its orator.
“This is a wholesale violation of his oath of office and a disqualifying offense,” he added, suggesting the speech should have included Obama’s admission that “his policies have failed.”
Stockman, who is hoping to oust Republican Sen. John Cornyn in the upcoming election, is often outspoken in his criticism of Obama and leftism in general. Sometimes, as evidenced by his early departure from Tuesday’s speech, actions truly do speak louder than words.
“I could not bear to watch as he continued to cross the clearly-defined boundaries of the Constitutional separation of powers,” he explained, adding he was “deeply disappointed in the tone and content” of the speech.
Stockman, a proven conservative with strong Tea Party support, did not mince words when he accused Obama of “abusing his Constitutional powers,” breaking his presidential oath, and “enacting his own brand of law through executive decree.”
The congressman’s remarks reflected those of many of his colleagues – not to mention millions of Americans outraged over Obama’s continual power grab.
Idaho Republican Rep. Raul Labrador, for example, issued a statement blasting the speech for its “hostility toward our foundational principles, condescension toward a co-equal branch of government, and a general aversion to common sense and bipartisanship.”
“This is a wholesale violation of his oath of office and a disqualifying offense,” he added, suggesting the speech should have included Obama’s admission that “his policies have failed.”
Stockman, who is hoping to oust Republican Sen. John Cornyn in the upcoming election, is often outspoken in his criticism of Obama and leftism in general. Sometimes, as evidenced by his early departure from Tuesday’s speech, actions truly do speak louder than words.
Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/congressman-explains-bailed-sotu-address/#FxzpGBapkjJ66oCx.99
No comments:
Post a Comment