Purging Senior Military Officers/NCOs..........Martial Law in the not distant future---Sounds feasible to me
Feasible?
When
I asked my colleague the Army Colonel why he thinks Obama is doing
this, the reply I received from this lifelong soldier and Army leader
shocked me.
Paraphrasing him, this is what he told me in a nutshell.
He
said, most branches of the service routinely engage in war “games” and
come up with strategies and tactics on how to handle every type of
military conflict and scenario that can be imagined . One of the big
new battle scenarios being actively discussed in the military recently
is how to handle civil unrest in the U.S. and fighting in the streets.
What will the Army do if called in to fight armed civilians in the
streets of the United States? How will that urban warfare be
conducted? Will troops be able to fire upon other American citizens
when the troops take an oath to protect American citizens?
He
said many in the military are discussing the very real possibility that
Obama will attempt to stay in office beyond two terms. It is being
speculated that Obama will do this by declaring a state of martial law.
The easiest way to declare martial law is when there is massive civil
unrest and riots throughout the U.S. Thus, it is believed that Obama,
and his regime, will intentionally create a situation of massive civil
unrest. Some believe he has already started to implement that strategy
by forcing Obamacare on everyone (when the populace did not ask for it
and less than 300 people in power voted for it). Perhaps the Obama
Administration is not too concerned over the totally dysfunctional
Obamacare web site and the additional fact that millions will be dropped
from their existing insurance policies which they already had and
liked. The Obama Administration may not care if getting health care
becomes more difficult and more expensive because it is all leading
toward civil unrest. It is believed by some that Obamacare will only
get worse and worse, and then in 2 to 3 years when people have a very
difficult time getting medical treatment for themselves or their loved
ones, people will get enraged.
Moreover,
it is being speculated that around the same time when the frustration
levels over Obamacare are hitting a critical point in 2 to 3 years,
there will be a “glitch” in the welfare payment (or EBT) payment
system. The tens of millions who rely on EBT handouts to sustain
themselves will be cut off. The overwhelming majority of the EBT
recipients are Black. The Obama regime will then blame the “glitch” on
the Republicans, i.e., Republicans froze government spending which
“forced” Obama to suspension of EBT payments. (Obama will intentionally
drive spending up and up uncontrolled knowing full well that one day the
Republicans will be backed into a corner and finally vote for a freeze
in spending.) Obama will create heightened racial tension by telling
everyone that the White Republicans are racially motivated and did this
to hurt the Black community. This manufactured racial tension, combined
with growing tensions over the then-collapsing medical coverage due to
Obamacare, will result in race wars and civil unrest. People will take
to the streets.
By
the way, you should know that my colleague, the Army Colonel who is
telling me all this, is Black. He specifically commented, and outwardly
expressed his embarrassment, about how Blacks have become so dependent
and enslaved by the welfare system and the Democrats that it would be
very easy to create civil unrest and race wars merely by cutting off, or
dramatically hindering, EBT payments for only a month or so. He
believes that most Blacks, who have a misguided sense of entitlement,
will then take to looting stores and rioting.
Once
the race wars, civil unrest, and violence becomes pervasive throughout
the U.S., Obama will declare martial law and take over. Elections can,
and will, be postponed under martial law.
My
colleague noted that this possibility is clearly being analyzed and
discussed inside the military because such a martial law strategy is
nothing new. Tyrannical and dictatorial leaders in the past have done
the martial law strategy many times. He noted that dictators such as
Stalin, Mussolini, and Hitler did basically the identical thing. He
went on to say that one of the most recent examples of this strategy was
when Marcos declared martial law in the Philippines from 1972-1981 due
to civil unrest. The Philippines had democratic elections up until that
time. When martial law was declared, the Philippine constitution was
suspended, its Congress dissolved, all elections were suspended, and
Marcos remained in power for years beyond his elected term. The alleged
“terrorist bombings” that occurred in the Philippines, which lead to
Marcos declaring martial law, have always been questioned and never
proven to be the acts of actual terrorists.
He
concluded by saying that many believe this is the real reason behind
the purgings of military generals. The older members of the military,
and especially its generals and leaders, tend to be more conservative
and they believe in the Constitution—and following the Constitution.
Thus, a tyrant and dictator needs to get rid of these military leaders
before a state of martial law is declared if the rising dictator wants
the military to follow along and do what the dictator says. Due to the
loss of many experienced military leaders the past few years, the
military is now being run and guided more and more by younger,
inexperienced leaders. The type who won’t really know what to do if
martial law was declared. Moreover, he noted that there is a growing
mind set throughout the military now that every soldier needs to keep
quiet and just follow along with what Obama says and wants to do or you
will be fired and your military career ruined. Again, I was told this
is nothing new since removing strong military leaders in advance of
declaring martial law is a historically-proven element of a rising
tyrant and dictator.
No comments:
Post a Comment