Charitable Gifts From Wealthy Koch Brothers Often Prompt Partisan Reactions
Industrialists Are Among Nation's Most Visible Supporters of Conservative Political Causes
Aug. 3, 2014 9:50 p.m. ET
Rarely has so much well-intentioned money spurred so much controversy.
One
$100 million gift, targeted to help build a new hospital facility, was
later the focus of street protests. A $25 million donation funding
scholarships for minority students prompted one Ivy League professor to
urge the rejection of the "tainted" gift. And a $1 million grant to fund
a business-school study provoked 50 prominent Catholic educators to
decry the "stark contrast" between the giver's ideology and the church's
traditional teachings.
In each case, the philanthropist behind the controversy was a brother named Koch.
Wealthy
industrialists
Charles Koch,
78 years old, and his brother, 74-year-old David, are among the
nation's most visible supporters of conservative political causes—a fact
that, in many cases, has made their nonpolitical giving a lightning rod
for partisan reaction.
Critics say their extensive donations
to higher education and health care, among other causes, are tainted by
tea party-friendly politics, and rife with hidden strings and agendas.
Conservatives call such reactions nonsensical, a product of knee-jerk
liberal intolerance.
All of which raises
the question: Should nonprofit groups—especially those in a largely
liberal city like New York—be concerned with a donor's political
leanings?
Melissa Cohlmia,
a spokeswoman for the Koch companies, doesn't think so, saying
"it is unfortunate that some people and organizations put their
political agendas ahead of helping people, especially those that are
sick and disadvantaged."
The question is
typically a matter for a receiving institution's board of directors to
decide, said
Naomi Levine,
a veteran fundraiser and executive director of New York
University's George H. Heyman, Jr. Center for Philanthropy and
Fundraising.
"When there's an ethical issue, you have to have a process in place," she said.
Ms.
Levine said some schools and charities, but not many, have rules for
accepting gifts. These policies—often interpreted by the board's
executive committee—usually focus on the legality of how a donor's money
is earned and whether the giver has publicly made racist or
anti-Semitic remarks.
Political leanings, on the other hand, usually don't raise a red flag, she said.
"I don't know the politics of many of
our donors," said Ms. Levine, who raised funds for New York University.
"I suspect many of them have politics that I would be unhappy with. But
that's irrelevant. If the money comes to us made legally and allows us
to do with it what the university needs, we will accept it."
Despite
vocal opposition to Koch donations by outside observers and occasional
stakeholders, institutions continue to accept the brothers' money.
Of
recently disputed gifts, both the $1 million donation made last year to
the Catholic University of America and the $25 million grant made in
June to the United Negro College Fund were accepted—which leaders of
each institution publicly defended.
Michael Lomax,
president and chief executive of the United Negro College Fund,
said through his spokesman that criticism for accepting the Koch gift
was a small price to pay to help children realize their dreams of a
college education.
Dr. Lomax and his
spokesman declined to comment on any gift-acceptance policy at the UNCF,
saying only that they have never used a political or ideological lens
to determine who can or can't give support.
In
their respective hometowns—Charles lives in Wichita, Kan., and David is
a longtime New Yorker—the brothers are known for their largess. The
Koch name dots many cultural and civic institutions in Wichita, home of
Koch Industries Inc., a privately held global conglomerate with
businesses ranging from fuels and fertilizer to cattle and electronics
parts. The Charles Koch Foundation, based in Wichita, gives widely to
U.S. colleges.
And while the brothers
are often lumped together in the public consciousness, their
philanthropy is substantially different. For his part, David is known
for multimillion-dollar gifts to his alma mater, the Massachusetts
Institute of Technology, and to many of New York's biggest cultural gems
and medical institutions, including the Metropolitan Museum of Art,
American Ballet Theatre and Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center.
Many organizations that have received such hefty donations from
David Koch
declined to respond to The Wall Street Journal about whether
their governing boards have gift-acceptance policies. A spokeswoman for
the American Museum of Natural History said the organization had no such
policy.
Mr. Koch serves on most of the
boards of nonprofits he donates to. As with any volunteer governing
body, members are generally expected to give an annual gift.
Still,
David Koch's $100 million gift last year to NewYork-Presbyterian
Hospital to help build an outpatient center was a featured grievance in
at least two subsequent union protests. Signs and banners at a March
rally read, "Quality Care, Not Koch Care."
Mr. Koch serves on the hospital's executive, real-estate and major-facilities committees.
While
leaders from the health-care workers' union 1199 SEIU and the New York
State Nurses Association said the rallies' main goal was to call
attention to working conditions at the hospital and its increasing
culture of corporatization, they said the events also were a chance to
voice disapproval of Mr. Koch. His funding of groups opposed to the
Affordable Care Act and Medicaid expansion, they said, runs counter to
the hospital's mission of making health care accessible for all.
Through
a spokeswoman, David Koch said, "The new ambulatory care center will
treat people from all walks of life and will result in hiring more
nurses too."
A hospital spokeswoman
declined to comment on the protests or on whether it had a
gift-acceptance policy, but expressed gratitude for Mr. Koch's donation
and longtime board contributions.
Steven J. Corwin,
the hospital's chief executive, said Mr. Koch's service on the
executive committee is "helping us to become one of the top hospitals in
the country."
Sometimes just the prospect of a Koch gift can spark controversy.
In
June,
Mitchell Langbert,
an associate professor of business at Brooklyn College, went
public with grievances he had with school administrators, who he said
squandered a chance to obtain millions of dollars from the Charles Koch
Foundation.
Mr. Langbert said he has a
contact at the foundation and had received signals of its openness to
receiving his proposal for a new center at the business school, which he
believed would expand and upgrade the department's faculty. He
previously had been awarded $5,000 from the foundation, he said, "to
write a report."
The college
acknowledged Mr. Langbert's previous grant from the Charles Koch
Foundation but said it had neither "received an offer from, nor
submitted a proposal to" the foundation for a multi-million-dollar
grant.
The foundation doesn't comment on its gifts, a spokeswoman said.
Mr.
Langbert said that, in his opinion, the school ultimately withheld its
institutional blessing because administrators were "afraid of a little
conflict" that pursuing or receiving such Koch-labeled money might
engender.
No comments:
Post a Comment